by nth » Tue 20 Jun 2006, 15:15:08
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pstarr', 'I')n rare cases (perhaps programming) work is measured mathematically and rewarded appropriately. In most cases 'work' is judged politically and personality. Offices are notorious popularity contests. If you are not in the office making face, and back-slapping your superiors, then you are out of the loop.
You are applying stereotypes and generalizing a lot here. I hope you do know that office work actually have physical results like reports and the like that can be used to be judged. Of course, that does not rule out promotions for people who do inferior work, but nevertheless, it points out that there are material things to be judged.
People just don't go to the office and sit around pushing buttons and get paid. They actually write reports or calculate or verify numbers, etc....
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o you really think that there will be office-buildings full of people yapping on the phone and pushing computer buttons when the economy slows. Fuel goes to important things not heating pointless office parks.
That is exactly my point. Even with 70% of the population in hunger, we will see the wealthy/ruling class hiring people to sit in offices and continue to do these jobs.
It happened in the Great Depression to give an example. Wall Street and bankers did not lay everyone off. Accountants and lawyers are still counting money and filing lawsuits. Analysts were still writing reports. There are a lot fewer of them, but nevertheless, companies continue to function to cater to the wealthy/rulers.
Maybe Communists maybe right and people rise up and rebel against this. But, I have a hard time seeing that happen.