by garyp » Tue 20 Jun 2006, 03:55:22
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Novus', 'I')t is kind of hard to proove a negative. Maybe you can keep 6.5 billion people alive without industrial technology but I just don't see it. What are you going to do with the raw sewage alone without power? If billions of people have to die to have a power down what makes you so special that you going to be survivor? I am not so arrogant as to think if 5 billion have to die I will be numbered among the survivors.
Powerdown equals mass death
Mass death equals my own death
Powerdown eqauls my own death
Embracing powerdown equals embracing my own death
Embracing my own death eqauls suicide
Therefore; Powerdown equals suicide
Thank you.
It was getting a little weird in here. Good to see that at least one other realises some practical realities.
To the rest of you. Please take a trip to the nearest mall. Sit there drinking a coffee and watch the passers by. Put yourself in their shoes, one at a time. Think what their life is like, what's important to them, what they know.
Now imagine telling them they have to grow, and really cook, their own food. Imagine telling them their power supply probably wouldn't be reliable. Their clothes would have to last and they can forget fashion. Tell them they won't be able to afford to travel far, that their life would be limited to the immediate area.
Imagine how they would react. Run their reaction forward a day or two.
My guess is you will find that you will find yourself imagining at least 80% of them saying no, and if you push it a good 50% getting violent. Particularly when you say you're prepared, you have supplies and you're happy with it - that it's a good thing.
There has been a lot of wilfull confusion around here. The question has never been if 'powerdown' isn't a possible reaction to limited oil supplies. Its a question of if enough people would ever take it up voluntarily for it to make a difference. Without that it ISN'T a solution.
I suggest they won't.
We REALLY need solutions that can make a difference, that people can buy into. As Novus points out, these are more likely to be of the shape of massive investment in alternative energies, coupled with acceptable energy efficiency approaches, and some regressive policies towards the third world.
I doubt most here will want to hear this. Emotional investment is in a viewpoint which suggests a green, ecological, vegan future. That most will choose death and destruction over this will be a shock to some.
However when you really think about it, its a brighter and better alternative to what will happen otherwise.