by Jack » Fri 16 Jun 2006, 22:13:39
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', '
')Especially since so few are interested in the possible solutions that even those who are aware of the issues don't bother to learn about the solutions or promote them.
Ludi, let's be honest here - your solutions - as I understand them - are viable in theory, but they ignore human nature.
My understanding of your position is that people living high energy lifestyles should power down, thus making more resources available for others. Since the total footprint is simply the sum of all footprints, reducing one category substantially should do the trick - unless and until population increases beyond some point.
The problem is, no one (with certain exceptions, duly noted) wants to power down. I'm not about to give up my air conditioning. I like all the various elements of my high energy lifestyle, just like everyone else. And even if that implies the death of billions, we're not going to give up our comforts and pleasures.
I'm sorry, Ludi - if people were kinder, more generous, and all the other things people aren't - your solutions might work. But one must deal with the population one has.