Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Lokutus » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 22:14:54

Okay, I have this anglophile friend who claims that Great Britain is actually pulling the strings which control US foreign policy and always has been. For example, he claims that the Brits are the ones who wanted to regain control of Iraq again, so they had the US act as if it was taking the lead role in the invasion. This way the puppet US would be the lightening rod for global protests and denunciations and not the Brits.

[Ok, I am posting this out of boredom. However stay with me.]

Whenever I hear this, I tell my fiend that Britain is now the USA's "little buddy" [like the Skipper and Gilligan]. Then he gets all upset and starts telling me about how the Illuminati and Bilderbergers control everything from Britain. He also likes to remind me that most US presidents can trace their lineage back to British Royalty. In fact, according to him, no one can get elected president unless they are of this royal lineage.

At this point my eyes glaze over with boredom.

So, any comments or opinions on which of the two great English speaking powers is in the driver's seat?
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Loki » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 23:08:37

He wishes. Britain is a tired old toothless has-been that's too cowardly to kick out the jihadist clerics from their own country. If anybody is pulling the neocons' strings it's Israel. They've done a magnificent job of infiltrating our government. What's good for Israel is good for America.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Lokutus » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 23:36:25

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'H')e wishes. Britain is a tired old toothless has-been that's too cowardly to kick out the jihadist clerics from their own country. If anybody is pulling the neocons' strings it's Israel. They've done a magnificent job of infiltrating our government. What's good for Israel is good for America.


Yeah, I agree.With all of the above.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby emailking » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 23:58:15

Is it true though that all Presidents have a link to British royalty? Surely, this must be known if true, but I have never heard it before.
User avatar
emailking
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Lokutus » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 00:05:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emailking', 'I')s it true though that all Presidents have a link to British royalty? Surely, this must be known if true, but I have never heard it before.


I really doubt it.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby venky » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 00:13:49

Well, it does seem that George Bush (and John Kerry too) is Queen Elizabeth II, something like 16th cousin a few times removed. A common ancestor in the 16th century. :-D
I play the cards I'm dealt, though I sometimes bluff.

Only Man is vile.
venky
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 819
Joined: Sun 13 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Micki » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 01:24:56

Well the Brittish royal lineage is a FRAUD.
Edward the 4th was a bastard son and unrightful heir of the throne.
The true King of Brittain lives in Australia and there is pretty good evidence of that.
The Age Article - King of the Britts
Throw out the con artists! Long live King Mike!
Micki
 

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Loki » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 01:51:10

I thought Paul Hogan was the heir to the British throne? Maybe I'm confusing him with Mel Gibson. All you Aussies look alike to me. :-D
Last edited by Loki on Tue 06 Jun 2006, 01:57:07, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby mrniceguy » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 01:56:35

Not the first time I've heard this,
http://cyclone696.blogspot.com/2006_02_ ... chive.html Look at the entry on Wednesday Feb 8th. I always read cyclones work and respect hs opinions, however I think he is off the mark on this one.
User avatar
mrniceguy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue 23 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Nottingham UK

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby RG73 » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 02:12:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'H')e wishes. Britain is a tired old toothless has-been that's too cowardly to kick out the jihadist clerics from their own country. If anybody is pulling the neocons' strings it's Israel. They've done a magnificent job of infiltrating our government. What's good for Israel is good for America.


Thanks Hitler. Yes, the Jews are controlling the world.

Meanwhile, in the real world, Israel is America's bitch. I'm not exactly sure how they can run the U.S. but are not powerful enough to not give up half their country to terrorists.

Not a single thing Bush has done since taking office has been good for Israel. Hmmm, increased terrorism there. Check. Made them give up territory? Check. Put their economy is the gutter. Check.

Seriously, lay down the Jewish conspiracy pipe. Olmert won't so much as piss without clearing it with Washington first. Just because some of Bush's nutter advisors are "Jewish" (I'm guessing none of them even attend synagouge on a regular basis) doesn't mean they control the world. Some of his nutter advisors are "Christian" too (like, oh, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Condi, etc.). But there isn't a Christian conspiracy. There is a conspiracy of psychopaths, unrelated to any ethnic or religious group.
User avatar
RG73
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 196
Joined: Fri 20 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Austin, Tx

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Loki » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 03:45:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RG73', '
')
Thanks Hitler. Yes, the Jews are controlling the world.



Whatever moron. Why don't you take your head out of your ass for 30 seconds and take a look around. If you don't think the Israeli lobby exercises an undue influence on American foreign policy, you're a truly brainless fuck. And let me guess, you think anybody who dares question Israel is an anti-Semite?
User avatar
Loki
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3509
Joined: Sat 08 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Oregon

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby thor » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 04:15:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Loki', 'I')f you don't think the Israeli lobby exercises an undue influence on American foreign policy, you're a truly brainless fuck.


There is no Zionist conspiracy and there never will be. The Jews do not control the world, never did, and never will. There is no such thing as an Israeli lobby playing us like a trumpet. Nope, Israel is a tiny democratic country that simply wants to survive the ongoing Islamist hatred.

Take a deep breath, you need to tone down the Ahmedinedjad-ism my friend.
User avatar
thor
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 482
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Doly » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 04:26:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thor', '
')There is no Zionist conspiracy and there never will be. The Jews do not control the world, never did, and never will. There is no such thing as an Israeli lobby playing us like a trumpet. Nope, Israel is a tiny democratic country that simply wants to survive the ongoing Islamist hatred.


They don't control the world, but it is true that they have a disproportionate amount of power for such a small country.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby turp182 » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 06:32:31

Regarding our ties to Israel.

I just go by the published battle plans.

If anyone touches Israel then the United States will attack.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/ ... index.html

From the article: "I told the prime minister what I've stated publicly before: Israel is a close friend and ally of the United States. And in the event of any attack on Israel, the United States will come to Israel's aid," Bush said.

Could Israel instigate such a thing?

Who's in control, at least when it comes to a conflict with Israel?

Why would we stake our military future in this manner, tied to the fate of one other nation?

Of course we ignore the Palestinian conflict, which is a war (it's not terrorism, it's just a war, it's been fought over the past few decades).

Regarding conspiracy theory, I don't concern myself with them, there's enough published "out in the open" things to worry about. Seriously, tie Bill Clinton to British Rolyalty, I dare you.
User avatar
turp182
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby julianj » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 08:00:22

Just to limp back on topic.

No, I don't believe that Britain is manipulating America. In fact I don't know why we're their bitch at all.

In some gangster films the ruthless New Boss keeps the neutered Old Boss around as a symbol of both his mercy and his power, that's currently the relationship between the previously Glorious-sun-never-sinks Britain, and the newly glorious We-make-our-own-Reality US Empire, IMO.

Cheers, or should I say ruff-ruff!

Posting from deep inside Poodleville,

Julian
The other place that believes completely in the right to keep and bear arms, particularly to use against foreign invaders and tyrants is: Afghanistan.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Dreamtwister » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 12:13:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emailking', 'I')s it true though that all Presidents have a link to British royalty? Surely, this must be known if true, but I have never heard it before.


It's true. Vritually every President can trace their lineage to the royal family.

But then again, if you are really concerned with heredity, you need to be aware that everyone who fought against the British during the war of independance and all of their decendants for ever are branded as traitors to the crown. They can never hold title, have no right to bear arms (as in coat of arms, not firearms), and can never return to the commonwealth on penalty of death.
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby julianj » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 12:46:29

I've never heard this before either. I think somebody should post a genealogical chart. Then I'll believe it. Until then it stays in the "abiotic oil" area of my (semi) consciousness
The other place that believes completely in the right to keep and bear arms, particularly to use against foreign invaders and tyrants is: Afghanistan.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Dreamtwister » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 14:11:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('julianj', 'I')'ve never heard this before either. I think somebody should post a genealogical chart. Then I'll believe it. Until then it stays in the "abiotic oil" area of my (semi) consciousness


Naturally, posting the full family trees of all 42 Presidents would be...unwieldy at best. But here are a few references to get you started:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4286105/

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')oth the president and the Massachusetts senator can claim ties to figures ranging from Charlemagne to Walt Disney to Marilyn Monroe, Harrison said.


Here, the common ancestor is a man named Edmund Reade. His wife and 2 daughters Elizabeth and Margaret came to the new world in the 1630's and married into the Winthrop and Lake families.

Other Presidents who can claim royal lineage, mostly taken from Burke's Presidential Families of the USA:

James Garfield - Charlemagne
Calvin Coolidge - Charlemagne via Louis IV
Rutherford B. Hayes - Charlemagne via Hugh Capet, King of France
James Buchanan - Charlemagne via William the Conqueror
Franklin Pierce - Charlemagne via William the Conqueror
William Howard Taft - Charlemagne via William the Conqueror
Bill Clinton - Henry II via John Lackland
James Madison - Henry II via Edward I
William Henry Harrison - Henry II via Edward I
Benjamin Harrison - Henry II via Edward I
Grover Cleveland - Henry II via Edward I
Gerald Ford - Henry II via Edward I
George H.W. Bush - Henry II via Edward I
George W. Bush - Henry II via Edward I
George Washington - Edward I via Edward III
Thomas Jefferson - Edward I via Edward III
John Quincy Adams - Edward I via Edward III
Zachary Taylor - Edward I via Edward III
Theodore Roosevelt - Edward I via Edward III
Franklin D. Roosevelt - Edward I via Edward III
James Monroe - Edward III via King James IV of Scotland

Granted, that's not all 42, but it's all I could come up with on short notice.

And some non-Presidential names that are nonetheless significant:

Nancy Reagan - Charlemagne via William the Conqueror
Bob Dole - Henry II via John Lackland and Henry III
John Kerry - Henry II via John Lackland and Henry III
General Colin Powell - Henry II via Edward I (I'm serious!)
General Robert E. Lee - Edward I via Edward III
Eleanor Roosevelt - Edward I via Edward III
Nelson Aldrich Rockefeller - Edward I via Edward III

And just for fun:

http://genealogyblog.com/election-2004/new-book-bushkerry-and-their-other-cousins-2714

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')ake current events, for example, such as the recent conflict in the city of Najaf in Iraq, where the Islamic fundamentalist cleric Al-Sadar had taken over the Iman Ali mosque‚??Ali being the founder of the Sh‚??ite branch of Islam. Ali married Mohammed‚??s (or Muhammad‚??s) daughter Fatima, but he was also the son of Mohammed‚??s uncle, Abu Tabid. Which makes him the 1st cousin 40 times removed of both George Bush and John Kerry, not to mention being their great-uncle by marriage as well (38th of Bush, 37th of Kerry).


But you see, geneology alone isn't very significant. For example, it's estimated that as many as 25% of the people in Great Britian can trace their ancestry to William the Conquerer (Myself included). And through William, they can further trace their lineage to Charlemagne, and the Merovingians kings before him.

And since claims of royalty stem from "divine right", tracing your own lineage to royalty and demonstrating it through heraldry is extremely important to establishing your own "divine right".
The whole of human history is a refutation by experiment of the concept of "moral world order". - Friedrich Nietzsche
User avatar
Dreamtwister
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2529
Joined: Mon 06 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby Lokutus » Tue 06 Jun 2006, 18:11:45

I trace my lineage all the way back to Adam & Eve.

Jesus, what a load of absolute horseshit this is.
What will arrive first? Peak Oil or the Second Coming? My money is now on the latter.
User avatar
Lokutus
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 886
Joined: Mon 19 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: OR, USA

Re: USA vs Great Britain: The Real Power?

Postby julianj » Wed 07 Jun 2006, 08:57:18

I agree with Lokutus. So what? Although I note that none of these people are connected to the current royal family the Windsors, previously Saxe-Coburg-Gotha.
The other place that believes completely in the right to keep and bear arms, particularly to use against foreign invaders and tyrants is: Afghanistan.
julianj
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 913
Joined: Thu 30 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: On one of the blades of the fan

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron