by IslandCrow » Mon 05 Jun 2006, 05:09:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('advancedatheist', 'T')his seems to falsify the idea that "economic incentives" make people change their behavior, not to mention make them try to anticipate and plan for the future.
Maybe we have not got a good hold on just what "economic incentives" are needed. Too often we think in linear realationships, say oil goes up $x a barrel so consumption goes down y million barrels, where there is a simple relationship between x and y. However, there is something that economists call "elasticity of demand", whereby people value the goods so much that price changes do not effect demand too much. It seems that the run up in oil prices so far have not produced much demand destruction. The big question is when will the elastic stretch to its maximum, and then we will see demand reducing with rising prices. One of my fears is that the price of oil will have to rise so high to make an 'economic incentive' that when the change comes there will be a huge crash.
For me, I try to calcualate my energy costs going forward a number of years - and even a small yearly rise gives me enough incentive to try and reduce demand. At least this gives me some time to make changes. I think most people look just at today's costs and so when the time comes to make lifestyle changes they will not have the time or money to do so (eg. the long communte means either selling out and moving nearer work, or loosing the job, but would one be able to afford a house nearer work?)
I know this is a side track from the 1 -2 % decline in air travel - but I believe that it would be much faster than that. People would forgo that to keep their cars going. So more tele-commuting, and more local holidays (not flying off to the sun)
We should teach our children the 4-Rs: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle and Rejoice.