by FoxV » Wed 31 May 2006, 10:47:37
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Licho', 'T')his type of engine has very high efficiency, up to 80% energy contained in hydrocarbon or hydrogen fuel is transformed into electricity. This should lead to cars that 4x outperform current cars in terms of hydrocarbon energy -> work efficiency.
I'm vary skeptical about this claim.
Although it does look like a very efficient design. It still looks like it goes through a normal heat engine cycle, so can only have a maximum heat to mechanical energy conversion of 40%.
Even if it does not follow a normal heat engine:
The exhaust gasses have heat and chemical energy so there's losses there (cogen heat would help reduce this loss)
Mechanical to electric energy will have losses (typically 5 - 10%) for generating electricity
Then electrical must go back to mechanical (again 5 - 10% loss) for running the electric motors.
If this goes into battery storage, then there's losses for battery charging (5- 10 %) and discharging (another 5 - 10%)
My suspicion is that they mean this system is 85% efficient of the Carnot cycle for an over all efficiency of 35% which is a bit better than a well tuned standard ICE (30%?)