by oilfreeandhappy » Tue 23 May 2006, 01:56:04
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'Y')ou're suggesting an investment in highly-efficient buses will improve Greyhound's image, and the image of bus transit in general. I'd say it's not the buses, per se, that are the "image" problem, but rather who is forced to ride them, those devoid of any other options. And why is this, you might ask? Well, bus travel is amongst the most ephemeral forms of transit, and Greyhound is no exception. The bus station in my hometown has been in no less than 5 locations in the last 10 years. How can one plan for the future around that? "No thanks, I'll just drive..." PO might change this attitude towards transit, but I don't think buying new buses will make the bitter pill go down any better.
I agree it will take more than modern buses. Much more. Massive AD campaigns would be required to change the image. And your point is well taken about the location of Greyhound stations. In many cities they are in seedy areas. I certainly don't have all the answers. Being an Engineer, this is not my field of expertise. It just seems strange to me that Mexico can have this High Class bus system, and the US cannot.