Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I saw a F-22 the other day..

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: I saw a F-22 the other day..

Unread postby J-Rod » Sat 06 May 2006, 10:59:07

Okay, I don't get the inference either. What is the correlation of insurance cancellations and a F-22? I was under the tin foil impression that cancellations would be either related to potential hurricanes this year expected in that area, or suspicion of another type pf attack on the area.
Reality is agreed perception. Unfortunately there is also a reality imposed by nature.
http://thisis.peakdoom.com - For all your doom needs!
User avatar
J-Rod
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Northeast Ohio

Re: I saw a F-22 the other day..

Unread postby peakaboo » Sun 07 May 2006, 08:38:39

Your sighting might have something to do with this article...see 3rd to last paragraph:


04-05-2006 - Marietta, Ga. -- The "forward boom frames" in the 62-foot-long fighter are constructed of titanium, a lightweight but extremely strong metal, and are used to anchor the aircraft's wings to its fuselage, said Air Force spokesman Doug Karas. During routine testing in December, Karas said, officials discovered that the titanium components may have been "improperly" treated, creating the possibility that the metal would not last as long as it is supposed to.

The flawed components, Karas said, "do not affect safety of flight and, consequently, no restrictions have been put on F-22 flight operations."

The problem affects Raptors No. 4017 through 4107, including most of the 66 Raptors that already have been delivered to the Air Force and several dozen more still being manufactured, Karas said. There are 23 Raptors assigned to Tyndall Air Force Base for F-22 pilot training with another six scheduled to arrive in the next year.

"This is not a result of improper design, but an issue with one supplier's manufacturing process," Karas said in a statement to The News Herald.

A spokesman with the Lockheed Martin Corp., prime contractor for the F-22, said Monday the company is working closely with Air Force experts to determine the extent of the problem. Structural tests including "fatigue" tests of the fuselage booms are continuing, said company spokesman Joe Quimby.

Under a "heat treat" process, the titanium boom frames are raised to a high temperature in order to "achieve the desired grain structure" in the metal, Karas said. "A section of the forward boom frames under investigation may not have been held at this temperature long enough" to reach the targeted strength, he said.

The trade publication Defense News reported Monday that it will cost about $1 billion to fix the flawed boom frames, but both Karas and Quimby flatly denied that allegation.

Raptor program officials also have identified the need to reinforce the aft boom in 41 of 73 Raptors to strengthen the juncture where the tail is attached to the fuselage, according to Air Force officials quoted by Defense News. (Of those 73 aircraft, 66 also are affected by the forward boom heat-treatment flaws, officials said.)

An Air Force spokesman told Defense News that the discovery occurred as part of the normal testing process for each new aircraft design.

"As the aircraft come down the production line, they continue to test the fleet," said Maj. Keith Scheirmann, chief of Raptor heavy maintenance and modifications at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. "Sometimes, we find areas where we want to go back and enhance the capability or upgrade the aircraft," he told the publication.

Still, fixing the problem in each airplane could require removing the wings to inspect the boom area, a time-intensive and expensive process, officials said.

The Air Force and Lockheed Martin are conducting further tests at a company facility to determine the severity of the problems and hope to have answers by the end of May.

The Defense Department and Congress have agreed to cap the F-22 program at 183 aircraft. Lockheed Martin has contracts to build another 107 of the advanced fighters, Quimby said.

Source: military.com
Photo: USAF
User avatar
peakaboo
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 21
Joined: Sun 05 Mar 2006, 04:00:00

Re: I saw a F-22 the other day..

Unread postby TWilliam » Sun 07 May 2006, 20:40:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Dreamtwister', 'I') think the real question is "Why are they moving state-of-the-art fighter craft BY TRUCK east toward the I-95?"

What threat to the eastern seaboard do they percieve that would necessitate moving aircraft by truck?


Perhaps it's simply less expensive than flying it across the country... :wink:

(EDIT: Or as peakaboo notes, maybe it was one of the broken ones... lol)
"It means buckle your seatbelt, Dorothy, because Kansas? Is goin' bye-bye... "
User avatar
TWilliam
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2591
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Re: I saw a F-22 the other day..

Unread postby rushdy » Mon 08 May 2006, 17:44:55

Can this one withstand being shot at by AK-47 wielding, tea towel wearing Arabs? :twisted:
User avatar
rushdy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon 21 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: I saw a F-22 the other day..

Unread postby 12amps » Sun 14 May 2006, 18:58:36

So how many people have downloaded and played this awesome game?

F-22 TAW Total Air War F22 ADF by DiD FULL DOWNLOAD! FREE!


Click here to download F-22 Total Air War (TAW) FULL version by DiD for FREE!

http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW ... s.exe.html

Enjoy!

If you have any questions or comments or the link does not work please contact bo.chen@sbcglobal.net OR f22taw@gmail.com and I will help you set the game up and
get flying in no time!

http://f22taw.googlepages.com/home
User avatar
12amps
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed 19 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Arlington TX

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron