Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Discussions related to the physiological and psychological effects of peak oil on our members and future generations.

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby katkinkate » Sat 06 May 2006, 05:28:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('musselj', 'a')s far as water is concerned
A. boil it!
B. well water!

C. distill it.
D. harvest rain water
Kind regards, Katkinkate

"The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops,
but the cultivation and perfection of human beings."
Masanobu Fukuoka
User avatar
katkinkate
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1276
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sat 06 May 2006, 07:17:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('arocoun', 'T')hose who favor a hard crash seem to believe that eventually, all of humanity will hold hands and create an eco-friendly, harmonious anarchy. And, they seem to grossly underestimate the grand change a hard crash would bring to their lives.


Don't know if that's just a general vibe you're getting or what, but it isn't my opinion.

One of the main reasons I want anarchy and a hard crash is due to the fun and unpredictableness of it. Just because it benefits the globe and the remaining humans even more is simply a side dish benefit to me. ;)

BTW to the cornucopians like Matty (who must have written LATOC whilst on personality changing drugs) can you stop trying to say things like :-

- "Pfft, you only want anarchy/hard crash/peak oil because you don't know what it really means" (like you do.. because that's why you want nothing to change)
- "You'll die if a spider/snake/dog/cat/human bites you" (this keeps you up at night doesn't it? how about if a hard crash doesn't happen a plane might fall out of the sky and land on you)
- "You're an idiot if you want less quality of life" (to some, like me, my QOL will dramatically increase, I was born for it)

You try and tell others how much worse they will be in a hard crash, when you don't know much about anything. To whoever survives the hard crash they will be in a world which is only too willing to give them more than they get now (except for the 1% richies amongst us here). So go back to your holiday home, shift a few more commodities, make yourselves a few more bucks WHILST YOU CAN.

WHAT HAPPEN?
SOMEBODY SET US UP THE BOMB
YOU ARE ON YOUR WAY TO DESTRUCTION
ALL YOUR HARD CRASH AM BELONG TO US

People like me who are not only hoping for a hard crash but helping to make sure it happens will be the ones knocking on your metal reinforced door saying "HERE'S JOHNNY".
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby arocoun » Sat 06 May 2006, 10:07:33

PolestaR: It was a general vibe I got from everyone except you. You are the unmentioned anomaly. :)
The Origin of Patriotic Philosophy
--We are Greek.
--The barbarians are not Greek.
--Therefore, we must conquer, exploit, and kill the barbarians.
User avatar
arocoun
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Micki » Sat 06 May 2006, 11:15:43

PornstaR or what ever your name was. You prove again that the doom wishers are an ego tripped bunch who failed in this society and now hope for another chance. And your moral standards when it comes to wasting lives and stealing are no higher than the lowest ones I've ever heard of.
As much as I am against a hard crash, I would have no hesitation (neither do I think anyone in this forum does) in taking you down if you as much as whispered a threat. Let's see how much you enjoy it then.
Micki
 

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby SoothSayer » Sat 06 May 2006, 11:28:45

I too get hacked off on occasion with PolestaR ... but if you review his past posts they are generally perfectly OK.

However he does have his moments :)
User avatar
SoothSayer
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Location: England

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sat 06 May 2006, 11:57:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'P')ornstaR or what ever your name was. You prove again that the doom wishers are an ego tripped bunch who failed in this society and now hope for another chance.


True to an extent I guess Micki. Though by some western standards what I have, and what I have done might not be considered failure. But to each his own. Others I know (who share my views) sure have failed at this "life" as we call it now, but it sounds like you think that people shouldn't learn from that and want change if possible. The problem with your line of thinking is at some point you think everyone is equal and has the same opportunities, when it isn't the case.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'A')nd your moral standards when it comes to wasting lives and stealing are no higher than the lowest ones I've ever heard of.


Comparing myself to the average person (like yourself) I would say what you call morals are near non existant on me.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'A')s much as I am against a hard crash, I would have no hesitation (neither do I think anyone in this forum does) in taking you down if you as much as whispered a threat. Let's see how much you enjoy it then.


That's alright, just go and justify death in your opinions (or one from the common pool) so that you can sleep at night. Like killing someone who is trying to steal from you, that's ok, but killing someone who has food and won't give it to you, that's bad. Gee, I'm lucky I'm not religious or I might go and agree with you there bob. As long as you have neighbour Jeff saying what you did was OK, then it is OK, right?

If I ever was a threat to someone like yourself Micki I find it kind of interesting that you imply that I wouldn't be prepared for most outcomes. The whole idea of being a threat to people in the future that I deem unworthy.. well... let's just say that's what gets me out of bed each morning. I am actually looking forward to the day I die, so maybe you can be the one I see on that day. Keep training and make your time.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Micki » Sat 06 May 2006, 21:22:03

Naeh your way off again.
I will do what is necessary to survive and to protect my family. The hard landing scenario is however not a preferred outcome to me.
You however have expressed that you prefer the worst case scenario and not only look forward to global misery but actively work for it to happen. That puts you in the anitchrist camp.
Micki
 

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sat 06 May 2006, 21:42:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'N')aeh your way off again.
I will do what is necessary to survive and to protect my family. The hard landing scenario is however not a preferred outcome to me.


You somehow think this is OK merely because you perceive it to be?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'Y')ou however have expressed that you prefer the worst case scenario and not only look forward to global misery but actively work for it to happen. That puts you in the anitchrist camp.


Totally agree about the antichrist part. Of course since you must have some christian beliefs I'm sure you know in the bible it says "don't judge people". I don't want to school you in a religion which isn't mine, but try reading the book you live your life by sometimes. To me, you are an antichrist.

Maybe we should do a vote here, whoever wants the soft landing, are you also religious? A christian maybe? Do you already have everything you need in life to survive fine?

It is simply a case of those WHO HAVE , don't want it taken away in a hard crash. Very simple.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Lighthouse » Sun 07 May 2006, 02:39:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '.')..Others I know (who share my views) sure have failed at this "life" as we call it now...


Hm, interesting. You say you have failed at "This Life". What makes you think to survive a hard crash or any crash scenario?

Do you really think people all of a sudden change to the better because of horrible circumstances which are ultimately coming with a crash?
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Lighthouse » Sun 07 May 2006, 02:52:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '.')..

Maybe we should do a vote here, whoever wants the soft landing, are you also religious? A christian maybe? Do you already have everything you need in life to survive fine?



Geez, what a waste of time. Fact is the crash is coming. When? I hope not soon — Hard or soft landing, we are fucked. Even the softest landing will change everything we take now for granted. BTW, I don't wish for any kind of crash. Unfortunately it's not what I want or hope that counts. :x

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '
')
It is simply a case of those WHO HAVE , don't want it taken away in a hard crash. Very simple.


You are so right! Unfortunately! If you don't have anything now, you will have less than that in a post PO world.
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Micki » Sun 07 May 2006, 03:13:23

PolestaR don't try to twist this into a religious or philisophical discussion. I personally believe the Bible is full of contradicitons and, particularly the old testament, full of anti-christian teachings.
This is not to say that I don't consider myself some kind of Christian. Just that you can't put me in any of the normal slots.

Actually i think there are a lot of christians out there who prefer a hard landing as they would see that as prophecies in the book of revelation coming true.

Similarly one would think that atheists would value earthly life as they do not believe in the spirit moving on.

Anyway, that is not what we want to discuss.


(Unless you think for instance random school shooting actually are fun) I just would like you to think a little about your statements.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Totally agree about the antichrist part.

A hard crash is where every man goes insane and starts killing people whilst they scrounge for their survival. Anything less than this is soft.

One of the main reasons I want anarchy and a hard crash is due to the fun and unpredictableness of it.


To summarise; you think mass killings and a world in chaos is fun.


I agree with Matt, you simply have no idea what you are talking about. Not that I speak of real experience, but I do have relatives who lived through war and I have listened to what they have told me and I don't wish anyone to experience that.
Micki
 
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby willjones4 » Sun 07 May 2006, 03:46:42

Im sure there are lots of people out there who think like Polestar-they will be an element to be dealt with in the event of a hard crash. I do, however, think they will be outnumbered by families/clans/groups all too ready to defend themselves. They will be like the hyenas on the savannah-more losses than wins but they still survive...
User avatar
willjones4
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue 16 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 07 May 2006, 07:47:19

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('willjones4', 'I')m sure there are lots of people out there who think like Polestar-they will be an element to be dealt with in the event of a hard crash. I do, however, think they will be outnumbered by families/clans/groups all too ready to defend themselves. They will be like the hyenas on the savannah-more losses than wins but they still survive...


I agree with your comments, but not about myself. I don't know what sort of force I will be, and it doesn't really bother me. I could die the first day and you know what, I would die happy. I don't think I am rambo, and I am not a gun toting lunatic. I just look toward the hard crash future as one which is unpredictable and one which should be fun for someone like myself.

As to how long I will survive or what will exactly happen, who knows. It's not like I think I am John Conner, though there are people that I have met and who are probably on this board, who think they are something along those lines.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 07 May 2006, 08:13:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'P')olestaR don't try to twist this into a religious or philisophical discussion. I personally believe the Bible is full of contradicitons and, particularly the old testament, full of anti-christian teachings.
This is not to say that I don't consider myself some kind of Christian. Just that you can't put me in any of the normal slots.


If you are even one part out of a million CHRISTIAN then you have some very simple ideas regarding good and evil. So for what I am talking about you are going to be pigeon-holed whether you like it or not. Of course you can renounce the base of your faith and tell me your thoughts on good and evil which don't relate to the bible if you want. I'm not the one thinking I will go to hell because of it. ;)[/quote]

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'A')ctually i think there are a lot of christians out there who prefer a hard landing as they would see that as prophecies in the book of revelation coming true.
Similarly one would think that atheists would value earthly life as they do not believe in the spirit moving on.

Anyway, that is not what we want to discuss.


Yes, though it is sort of hard to know whether these people are really christian or not. Looking for "CERTAIN" highly visible signs that are planned out in Revelations could indicate a lack of faith. There is no difference being an athiest and a christian if once you see the signs in revelation you can change your ways..


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', '(')Unless you think for instance random school shooting actually are fun) I just would like you to think a little about your statements.


Your use of some socially popular "unjustified crime" as an example to test the boundaries of my ideas is not new. I commonly use paedophilia or child molesting as one of my boundary pushers when talking to people like yourself. In this particular instance I don't necessarily find random school shootings "fun", though they are interesting. A hard crash has my participation whereas something someone else does to someone else rarely keeps me entertained for long.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'T')o summarise; you think mass killings and a world in chaos is fun.


Well sort of, when I am a participant in the world, yes. Surely is more fun than sitting in a cubicle/office/house for 8 hours a day "working". For me anyhow. Don't just concentrate on "sins" which you find really bad, move to the other fun stuff too.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Micki', 'I') agree with Matt, you simply have no idea what you are talking about. Not that I speak of real experience, but I do have relatives who lived through war and I have listened to what they have told me and I don't wish anyone to experience that.

Since I haven't had direct experience with a hard crash scenario there is always the chance that "once faced with the realities" that my opinions will change. I find this unlikely but it *is* a possibility.

Don't let that get you (Matt , and all your other softies) off the hook however and just place it in the "he's ignorant, he'll definitely change" demographic. I think the same way about the hard crash as christians do about their heaven afterlife.

An example which might illustrate this point. It's like me saying to you that when satan tests you about your christian beliefs that you will fold and renounce your faith. Now you know that there might be a possibility however slight, that satan might be able to do things to you to make you renounce your faith. You certainly hope with every ounce of your strength though that you will not give in to it. This battle emulates the same battle I have with when facing the reality of the hard crash that I won't feel positive towards it like I do now. The same way you feel the spirit and know jesus is a part of your life, is the same way I know I was born for an anarchist life. Test my faith and it will test yours.

The problem with my beliefs and ideas is they aren't founded on anything which can't be proven in this world. I don't have to rely on "well god says so" or "because it just IS" as you eventually have to when defending your core religious beliefs. This is why most people have difficulty in believing something so honest and feel the need to argue with me even though they have nothing valid to say except "society says that is like wrong". I don't expect people who are well programmed like you, Matt, Lighthouse and a bunch of others on this forum to ever understand. For one you most likely lack the higher reasoning to do this if you haven't thus far.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 07 May 2006, 08:21:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lighthouse', 'Y')ou are so right! Unfortunately! If you don't have anything now, you will have less than that in a post PO world.


How is this possible unless you are very rich now? Post shit hitting the fan you will have the possiblity to claim land and live on it without having to worry about working for 30 years to do it. Of course land ownership won't be something which will be well respected and so there are security concerns regarding it. It all leads to a world which would be very unpredictable and keep you on your toes.

In my opinion one of the biggest items which adds to "quality of life" is some place to call a home. Whether that home is roaming your country or settling down somewhere. Unfortunately most people in this world have no place to call home, post SHTF it will be something in abundance again.

A hard crash is simply going to redistribute the wealth much better than anyone seems to anticipate. Of course all the rich people here don't want their wealth redistributed, they worked "hard" for it.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby SeasonOfPain » Sun 07 May 2006, 10:18:07

PolestaR, your argument is very logical, based upon your stated premise (which is a good thing). I think the problem here is that many are trying to get a handle on what the premise is that you're arguing for, i.e. what your core philosophy is.

You've defined your goals as "having more fun", and have loosely described this as something better than sitting in an office for eight hours a day. Can you elaborate on this? What kind of life would bring you happiness, and how do you see yourself in relationship to the larger population in such a life?

As for me, I personally think that while either type of crash will have the same net effect of reduced population, a soft crash will involve more net suffering, as it will be spread out over a longer period of time. I tend to think of it in terms of dying from a gunshot wound vs dying from terminal cancer (without the aid of painkillers).

A soft crash will also likely involve a greater depopulation of other species, as the survivors attempt to use up the last resources. Inhospitable climate change may or may not be inevitable at this point, but a soft crash would almost surely contribute further towards it.

I'm not especially looking forward to either scenario. I'm bound to wind up dead either way, as I'm physically unfit, and in search of a philosophy for continued existence. I'll try to help those I care about to survive. Beyond that, curiosity as to how this will play out is what currently keeps me going.
User avatar
SeasonOfPain
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon 04 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Madison, WI

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby PolestaR » Sun 07 May 2006, 11:07:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeasonOfPain', 'P')olestaR, your argument is very logical, based upon your stated premise (which is a good thing). I think the problem here is that many are trying to get a handle on what the premise is that you're arguing for, i.e. what your core philosophy is.

You've defined your goals as "having more fun", and have loosely described this as something better than sitting in an office for eight hours a day. Can you elaborate on this? What kind of life would bring you happiness, and how do you see yourself in relationship to the larger population in such a life?


A life where no one controls my actions except myself, hence I am totally responsible for everything I do. Ideally at some point it would be good to settle down and have some sort of farming type existence. Once the population die off has occured, there will be a lot more resources to go around and hopefully whoever is left will do the right thing and live sustainable lives. Anyone who isn't living sustainable will most likely be targetted by me.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SeasonOfPain', 'A')s for me, I personally think that while either type of crash will have the same net effect of reduced population, a soft crash will involve more net suffering, as it will be spread out over a longer period of time. I tend to think of it in terms of dying from a gunshot wound vs dying from terminal cancer (without the aid of painkillers).

A soft crash will also likely involve a greater depopulation of other species, as the survivors attempt to use up the last resources. Inhospitable climate change may or may not be inevitable at this point, but a soft crash would almost surely contribute further towards it.

I'm not especially looking forward to either scenario. I'm bound to wind up dead either way, as I'm physically unfit, and in search of a philosophy for continued existence. I'll try to help those I care about to survive. Beyond that, curiosity as to how this will play out is what currently keeps me going.


Your analogy is a good one. Since you have used your brain instead of simply posting reactions you can also see how a slow crash is going to be the worst thing for everyone involved. I don't know why you wouldn't be looking forward to it though, it is going to be the best thing that ever happened to the humans and to the earth.

We will come out of it with most of the knowledge we currently have. Sure there will be suffering, maybe more than we have now, maybe less. Definitely more in western countries. If people really cared about suffering though as much as they make out, you wouldn't be seeing them on the internet or leading consumerist style lifestyles. Instead all of their leftover (after needs only) money would be going to help all the suffering already existing in the world.
Bringing sexy back..... to doom
PolestaR
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby MadMarcus » Sun 07 May 2006, 16:36:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '
')How is this possible unless you are very rich now? Post shit hitting the fan you will have the possiblity to claim land and live on it without having to worry about working for 30 years to do it. Of course land ownership won't be something which will be well respected and so there are security concerns regarding it. It all leads to a world which would be very unpredictable and keep you on your toes.

In my opinion one of the biggest items which adds to "quality of life" is some place to call a home. Whether that home is roaming your country or settling down somewhere. Unfortunately most people in this world have no place to call home, post SHTF it will be something in abundance again.


Interesting. I do not agree but I can understand that position. Thank you for sharing it.

I guess I'm about 180 degrees opposite. I can accept and even welcome most of the post SHTF future but I feel we will all be bound to our homes in a way I am not looking forward to. I do not see a nomadic existence as being very available in most places post peak due to the destruction of the environment (current & during the crash).Of course I'm conservative (in the nonpolitical sense) by nature. A farmer not a gunslinger. You have more of the gunslinger mentality.
User avatar
MadMarcus
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Fri 17 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Top

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Micki » Sun 07 May 2006, 19:35:19

I don't have any issues either with what SeasonOfPain wrote.
I also believe both soft- and hardcrash are going to be bad and I am not sure which is worst. I just fail to see how bringing the worst kind of misery on to people can be fun.

PolestaR, what makes you think you are in control of your own life in a hardcrash scenario?
When a mob takes over your place, kills your familly and rapes your sorry ass, would you still think you are in control and can die happy?
If your parents die a painful death because there is no medicin, would that be unpredictable and fun enough?

I guess we can agree to disagree on these matters.
Micki
 

Re: I think I might prefer a "hard crash" ...

Unread postby Lighthouse » Sun 07 May 2006, 20:36:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Lighthouse', 'Y')ou are so right! Unfortunately! If you don't have anything now, you will have less than that in a post PO world.


How is this possible unless you are very rich now? Post shit hitting the fan you will have the possiblity to claim land and live on it without having to worry about working for 30 years to do it. Of course land ownership won't be something which will be well respected and so there are security concerns regarding it. It all leads to a world which would be very unpredictable and keep you on your toes.


Interesting. What makes you think you will be able to claim land without upsetting the current land owners? I think landownership will be sacred and land will be heavily defended and you will be shot if you try to claim someone's land. The only valuable assets will be gold and land.

Again if you have nothing yet, you will be fucked in a post PO society.

My advice: Get out of debt now, own your house and land, get rich, own more land and gold. How? Use your brain, believe me its fun!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'I')n my opinion one of the biggest items which adds to "quality of life" is some place to call a home. Whether that home is roaming your country or settling down somewhere. Unfortunately most people in this world have no place to call home, post SHTF it will be something in abundance again.


Exactly! But you have to own it and not the bank! Just look what happened to mortgaged landowners in the great depression.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PolestaR', 'A') hard crash is simply going to redistribute the wealth much better than anyone seems to anticipate. Of course all the rich people here don't want their wealth redistributed, they worked "hard" for it.


I don't agree on that one. Again look at the great depression. The poor and the middle class were fucked. Yes, wealth was redistributed but just to guys like Howard Hughes. Again post-PO will not be fun if you don't have anything before TSHTF.
User avatar
Lighthouse
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu 02 Mar 2006, 04:00:00
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Medical Issues Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests