by Clouseau2 » Sun 30 Apr 2006, 17:41:49
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mekrob', 'D')oesn't it seem a little wierd that they say it will be three more years, yet just at that moment, Bush is out of office? I can't think of any real significance that could have, but it just seems so wierd. I mean, basically, if it turns out to be more than three years, then it's not his fault, but the new President's.
Maybe it's just like cutting the deficit in half, isn't that always going to happen within "5 years"? Actually, maybe the plan is to get the deficit so sky high that it actually IS possible to "cut in half".