by grabby » Fri 28 Apr 2006, 12:53:42
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('BrazilianPO', 'I') am very sceptic about any of those products to save fuel. But I would be curious about the results of a serious test carried out by a credible motor organization. There are quite a few products out there if you google "fuel saver", but I still believe the way to go is to downsize and use other fuels - natural gas and ethanol. In Brazil, for example, almost half of the cars are 1.0L and easily get 17km/l (43mpg). After just two years of mass production, over 80% of the new cars sold run on petrol and ethanol. At this rate, we will retrofit the entire fleet, or almost all, in less than 10 years. The cost is an extra U$ 300 mainly due to a new microprocessor to analyse the fuel proportion and adapt the engine for it.
Why would you retrofit for ethanol when there is no ethanol?
We can't make enough ethanol to even have it in all the service station.
If you have an ethanol car now you would be stuck at home.
If you DID live in Boise Idaho and fill at their ethanol gastation, you will be paying more than gas?
Why do you want to pay even more for a fuel that gives you half the power?
just fill up with gas and send ME twenty dollars each fillup and you will have the same effect.
There never will be aenough ethanol
there cannot be
it is a POLITICAL GIMMICK
ethanol is NOT POSSIBLE
we cannot run on it nor rely on it
WHY?
to REPLACE ethanol wuse in the world we need 4 billion bushels of grass/corn/clippings per DAY
it isnt possible.
the best they can do is replace ten percent of all our use if they copnverted ALL OUR CORN AND WHEAT AND OATS into ethanol and we lived off of bubblegum we could only supply ten percent
so all you have to do is put the 10 percent into the existing gas, you dont have to retrofit anything.
we have to be careful to prevent from falling into the popular mechanic dream swoon of personal flying hydrogen magnetic dick tracy buckets.
it aint gonna happen
ethanol is a dead issue it isnot possible in america
in Brazil in the big cities it is possible and they are paying more for less, they have tropical sun and sugar cane and they can produce almost 20 percent of their needs
WHICH IS A WHOLE LOT LESS THAN OUR NEEDS!
I mean texas uses more oil than brazil.
Retrofit to ethanol is not going to be
1. useful
2. feasable
3 and foolish
If you still think alternates will in any way at ALL going to help our problem, you do not understand peak oil
final word.
read this web site a few more months, alternates to work would have to toatlly kill all agriculture and/or suffocate us in 10,000 times as much pollution.
sorry.
have a nice day.
Ok ok I'll explain
we use about 1 billion gallons of oil a day in the usa
a humongous ethanol plant nearby our house will produce 1 million gallons (WOW) a month
that is 33 000 gallons a day
we need one billion for the US
that is ONE THIRTY THOUSANDS of our needs
we need 30,000 ethanol p;llants to replace americas production.
what is one thirty thousands of 30 gaollons?
ok ok one thousndth of a gallon
how much is that
5 tablespoons for every 30 gallons.
you know how much deisel and electricity it takes to make the 5 tablespoons?
4 tablespoons.
we made one tablespooon per tank with a giant alcohol plant taking in seed from two counties.
I get more than that on my hands when I fillup.