by Jenab » Thu 28 Oct 2004, 09:19:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Anonymous', 'W')hat's funny is our leaders think that about you, dear peasent. The American royal families (Bush, Kerry, etc) you the same way the Saudi Royal family see its citizens. Expandable . . .
You may be mistaken about where the moral error is. Tyler's judgment that almost everybody values his own life higher than he values other lives, his own family more than other families, and (normally) his own race above other races - are all correct. It's normal for living things to be selfish, and for tribally evolved creatures to be concerned first and foremost for the well being of their own tribes, not those of foreigners.
The reason these attitudes are normal is that they are survival adaptations that for millions of years has helped individuals, races, and species to survive.
The natural purpose of moral codes is to aid a group of
related people in surviving and in being more effective at what they do. A good moral code does
not insist that all men are brothers whom we should love and regard as equally valuable. Rather, it insists that the individual should be prepared to sacrifice for those
specific others...
1. To whom he either owes his existence (direct ancestors)
2. Whose existence proceeds from him (direct descendants)
3. Who can be depended on to aid in the survival of persons in (1) or (2), including, persons who are also direct ancestors or descendants of at least one of his own direct ancestors or descendants, such as
3a. spouses: direct ancestor of his children
3b. aunts & uncles: direct descendants of his grandparents
3c. brothers & sisters, nieces & nephews: direct descendants of his parents
In other words: his kinfolk.
The genes that made their carriers create dual-code moralities of this sort (amity within group, enmity toward outsiders) gained an advantage in the struggle for mastery. And, once tribal dual-code moralities appeared, a new strategy of warfare became imperative for certain tribes who by some deficiency were unable to stand in the world unsupported. That new strategy involves the undermining of the dual-code tribal morality of a foreign group, which the parasitic group wants to victimize.
Jerry Abbott