by lorenzo » Sat 15 Apr 2006, 09:11:36
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('pup55', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'M')ercer’s study is based on detailed assessments and evaluations of 39 key quality of living determinants, grouped in the following categories:
* Political and social environment (political stability, crime, law enforcement, etc.)
* Economic environment (currency exchange regulations, banking services, etc.)
* Socio-cultural environment (censorship, limitations on personal freedom, etc.)
* Medical and health considerations (medical supplies and services, infectious diseases, sewage, waste disposal, air pollution, etc.)
* Schools and education (standard and availability of schools, etc.)
* Public services and transportation (electricity, water, public transport, traffic congestion, etc.)
* Recreation (restaurants, theatres, cinemas, sports and leisure, etc.)
* Consumer goods (availability of food/daily consumption items, cars, etc.)
* Housing (housing, household appliances, furniture, maintenance services, etc.)
* Natural environment (climate, record of natural disasters)
This explains it. It's basically a political swipe at the US. Has nothing to do with how the people in a given city like it. . Half of these are weighted heavily toward european preferences for things like: public health care, education, street crime, the current attitude toward political dissent, and environmental issues. If you do not worry about that stuff, it completely changes the index.
Also, setting the index with New York being 100? Europeans typically think of NY as the prototypical American city, which is obviously silly.
1. What criteria would you use to talk about quality of life if not the ones used by Mercer? Please give some examples.
2. Mercer Consulting is an American company, founded in 1937, one of the largest consulting firms and a very American one. It's not a creative intellectual euro-leftist think tank or something like that. It's a pretty ordinary typically American consulting buro. So why do you think such a very American consulting firm would create a political swipe at the U.S.?
3. I think that at least half of all criteria used by Mercer can be considered to be prototypically American criteria: crime, law enforcement, Freedom (twice: yadayada "Freedom"), availability of consumer goods, etc... In my opinion, the study is biased in favor of American cities.
4. The fact that New York is chosen as the index has nothing to do with Europeans' perceptions, since this is a study made by Americans, for Americans, using American criteria. Keep Euros out of this please.