Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Peak Fresh Water Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Water hoarding?

Unread postby Specop_007 » Tue 17 Aug 2004, 11:27:22

Something to think about.... Clicky

It might behoove one to live next to a body of water.
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Tue 17 Aug 2004, 12:55:14

i guess that is mcdonalds future stuffed then!! :lol:

Mind you i don't know how i am going to cope without BBQ spare ribs :cry:
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England

Unread postby KiddieKorral » Sat 21 Aug 2004, 17:48:54

I live near a spring-fed stream, so water is no problem for me. It is something to think about, though. There was some... how should I put this... "unpleasantness" on the western barrier islands this past week over water. And about the ribs; may I suggest substituting chicken fried chicken?
American by birth, Muslim by choice, Southern by the grace of God!
User avatar
KiddieKorral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 851
Joined: Fri 18 Jun 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 28° N 81° W

Speaking of wasting water....

Unread postby JR » Mon 25 Oct 2004, 19:27:31

The shower thread got me to thinking of other ways people waste water. Obvious things like watering the lawn came to mind. But, how much water is wasted when we brush our teeth? How many people turn on the faucet and just let the water run while brushing their teeth? I turn it on when I start to wet the brush, then at the end when I'm done to rinse the sink. If you brush your teeth for the full five minutes that it is said you should....thats a lot of water wasted if you leave the tap run the whole time.

Guess I must be bored tonight if this is what I'm thinking about. :roll:



Jodi
JR
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun 16 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural, Indiana.

Unread postby Terran » Mon 25 Oct 2004, 19:57:43

I am really water conservative when I brush my teeth, I don't just let the water run. I take a cup and I fill it with water... Then I go on the brush my teeth, after I'm done, I use the water that is in the cup to rinse my mouth. To sum it up, I only use two cups of water to brush my teeth.

I don't think this is wasteful but it takes less than 5 seconds to rinse toothbursh, so overall use cups like I do, and you'll save water.
User avatar
Terran
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 405
Joined: Wed 07 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Berkeley CA

Unread postby JR » Mon 25 Oct 2004, 20:04:04

That's pretty much what I do too, Terran. I have to wonder how much water would be saved if everyone did this when brushing their teeth. I actually heard something about this on the Chicago radio news a few months ago. They gave an estimate on how much water would be saved if people did this, but I didn't hear what they said.



Jodi
JR
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 149
Joined: Sun 16 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural, Indiana.

Unread postby savethehumans » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 00:09:06

Me, I wet the paste and brush enough to get a good lather going. (Takes about 2 seconds.) Then the water doesn't come back on till I've finished brushing, and spit out. On goes the water for a few secs as the stuff goes down the drain. Off it goes! I doubt I use more than 10 secs of water in the whole process. (And, yeah, I know the above description is disgusting! :razz: )

People will catch on to water conservation once mandatory rationing is in effect--not just during regional droughts, but all the time, all over the country. Then people will learn REAL quick how to still have water at the end of their rationing period! :lol:
User avatar
savethehumans
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1468
Joined: Wed 20 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 01:18:46

Here's an eye opener: 90% of all of the Colorado River water goes to raise mostly alfalfa, which is fed to beef and dairy cattle. This beef production only represents 13% of the entire US beef production. No other single activity has altered the shape and texture of western lands, than the raising of cattle. Nor does any other activity consume more water. If real reductions in the consumption of water in the West are to be achieved, our production of water intensive crops like alfalfa and cotton, will have to be severely curtailed. It has been estimated that a 7 percent reduction in agricultural water use would provide a 100 percent increase for urban use. While urban use accounts for only about 6 percent of Colorado River water, nearly 50 percent of that figure goes to water lawns.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby skateari » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 01:31:01

wow those are some suprising statistic there monte..
User avatar
skateari
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Sun 26 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby fastbike » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 01:40:28

Where I live we are blessed with a supply of pure artesian water. The local council just pumps it out of the ground and into the pipes. Regular testing shows it is some of the best municipal water in the world - and believe me, I lived in a few places where you wouldn't want to drink the local water (taste as well as health issues).

Now, what do my fellow citizens do with this wonderful endowment.

Pour great heaps of it on their LAWNS. And we live in a temperate climate so there is truely no need to water a lawn even if you want to grow a lawn.

Last summer the water supply was under pressure so locals were asked to stop lawn watering. Not a popular request.

Does this sound like a parallel to our planet's oil endowment - i.e. find trivial uses for it rather than truly life enhancing/sustaining uses !

Finally, the biggest growth industry here is conversion of dryland sheep farms to fully irrigated dairy farms. Just one conversion last year, extracts more water on a daily basis than does our city of 300K pop.
User avatar
fastbike
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon 13 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 01:41:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('skateari', 'w')ow those are some suprising statistic there monte..


Yes, I used to be a park ranger at Lake Mead and Lake Powell. I have studied water issues extensively. Makes you sit up and think about it little differently doesn't it? We pay farmers in Alabama not to grow cotton and then subsidize the irrigation water so we can grow cotton in the desert. Go figure.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby gg3 » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 08:31:48

Monte, I read that item about cattle to suggest that a 7% reduction in meat consumption will result in a 100% increase in water available to urban areas. Is that correct?

In which case, no reason it can't be done. (oops, there's that word "reason" again!)

Toothbrushing: I turn on the water at a trickle and put the cup under it. Wet the brush, add toothpaste, do the brushing, and by the time I need to rinse, the cup is about 3/4 full.

Lawns: Yes, another exercise in pure idiot waste that should be done away with. Though, perversely enough, in some areas, municipal codes *require* large lawns. Places like that should have their water cut off entirely for a while.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby frankthetank » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 12:30:01

I've read Saudi Arabia uses huge amounts of underground water to raise crops in the desert.

In dry deserts, I bet evaporation rates are very high. I live in a very wet climate, so water use isn't a top priority. Crops grown around here depend on mother nature for water.

I don't use much water, but i will say this. Why don't US homes have urinals? All stores have them. I think peeing in the toilet and then flushing is very wasteful. Maybe I'll start peeing outside... :-D
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Unread postby MonteQuest » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 20:05:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', 'M')onte, I read that item about cattle to suggest that a 7% reduction in meat consumption will result in a 100% increase in water available to urban areas. Is that correct?


No. Alfalfa is fed to cattle, dairy cows, horses, goats, sheep, etc. Cattle are also fed grain; oats, corn, sorghum, silage, etc. A 7% reduction in agricultural irrigation in the West, would free up enough water to provide a 100% increase in urban use in the West. This crop is also the most water intensive, requiring 6 acre feet/year as opposed to .5 acre feet/year for lettuce, which is why there is so much potential. Agriculture has been the biggest beneficiary of the Colorado's water because the farmers got there first. Western water law has its roots in the concept that whoever could put the water to beneficial use first, had first rights to it. Cheap, federally subsidized water grows alfalfa, which is fed to beef cattle in the seven states of the Colorado River Basin. And, like I stated earlier, these seven states, including those portions of the states lying outside the basin and not receiving Colorado River water, produce only 13 percent of the total value of the nation's beef. The Reclamation Act of 1902 was enacted to help settle the West, not provide a subsidy in perpetuity for about 100,000 ranchers. Go figure.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Unread postby stepka » Tue 26 Oct 2004, 23:53:11

My vote for all time stupid water use is . . . growing rice in the desert. I have heard they do this in certain arid parts of California and Texas?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Maybe I'll start peeing outside...


And Frank, may I suggest peeing on the compost pile? It heats things up nicely. (Don't ask me how I know that!)
User avatar
stepka
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: missouri

Unread postby trespam » Wed 27 Oct 2004, 00:07:27

I have used water sparingly for years. I turn the shower on, get wet, turn it off, lather and shampoo, rinse, and out. I use hardly any water at all. Same for brushing teeth and everything else. I hate waste. Especially of water.

Of course, if we use everything sparingly, it just means that we'll be able to fill this damn planet with 15 billion people instead of 8 or so. Kind of makes you want to spoil the commons. Wouldn't be moral though. Conservation is a personal virtue. Cheney was right. Well, partially right. It also should be a public policy.

On the beef thing: I eat hardly any beef. In general, I tend towards vegetarian, but am not adverse to eating meat. But cows seem like such a waste of resources and, more generally, people eat way too much protein. They could get by with a lot less.
User avatar
trespam
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue 10 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Diego, CA, USA

Unread postby gg3 » Wed 27 Oct 2004, 00:31:35

Why not urinals in houses? They take up expensive square footage of floor space, and they only serve half the population.

Two other options are a whole lot better:

a) Graywater recycling: filter the water from the shower and laundry, pump it up to an overhead tank, use it to flush the toilet; and/or,

b) A two-handle toilet. One is labeled "1" and is for Number One. The other is labeled "2" and is for Number Two. (translation for non-Native English speakers: #1 and #2 are USA slang for "pee" and "poop")

Anyone who can't figure out the difference between the two flush handles is probably suffering from a diagnosable cognitive disability and would have custodial care anyway.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Unread postby fastbike » Wed 27 Oct 2004, 02:57:23

Why do you need all that water to flush?. In most other parts of the "flushing" world you use 3 litres for a #1 and 6 litres for a #2. These 2 button toilets work well too.
Let's hope the next generation have a sense of humour ... our generation will need it.
User avatar
fastbike
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Mon 13 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: New Zealand

Unread postby Itch » Wed 27 Oct 2004, 03:36:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')hy do you need all that water to flush?. In most other parts of the "flushing" world you use 3 litres for a #1 and 6 litres for a #2.


This is where sinks come in good use, except for a #2, unless your sink hole is significantly larger than mine. I've found that urinating in the sink not only takes less effort, but is generally much more controlled for me, since the jet stream doesn't have much time to disperse and spatter the side of the toilet. It's also helped wash away any toothpaste gobs, although getting rid of those only takes some simple preventive measures. After I'm done, I fill up a small paper cup to wash it down. I've been doing this for months and no one has noticed. This might be a bit difficult for the women, but maybe they can use some human ingenuity to find a way around this.
User avatar
Itch
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 317
Joined: Wed 30 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Next

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron