Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 12:30:18

The new oil bourses springing up show economic/political power is shifting from West to East -basically from previous oil exporters (US and UK) to the last remaining oil exporters (Russia and OPEC).

Russian to open oil bourse: Novosti

Qatar to open oil bourse:

Xinhua

Kish proposed oil bourse (can't tell if this is one and the same as the proposed Iranian oil bourse)

Kish News

Proposed Iranian oil bourse:

Globe&Mall.com
Last edited by seahorse2 on Thu 23 Mar 2006, 14:54:00, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby LadyRuby » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 14:54:11

You forgot the Dubai bourse:

Dubai Mercantile Exchange Announces Developments in Creation of New International Energy Exchange

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he Dubai Mercantile Exchange (DME) today announced recent developments in the creation of a new commodity exchange that will initially develop and trade a Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures contract in the heart of the world's largest hydrocarbon province.

The DME aims to meet the growing market need for price discovery of Middle East Sour Crude Oil whilst simultaneously addressing the time zone gap between Europe and Asia by providing a hub for the trading of energy futures, options and other products.

...

He added: "The establishment of an exchange and the securing of a new Middle East Sour Crude Oil Futures contract is a complex process. However, in line with the guidance that we have given our potential customers, we expect to meet our stated goal of a launch in the fourth quarter of 2006.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 15:03:05

Interesting how all these bourses plan to be open in 2006.

So, I have the following questions:

(1) Why all the sudden interest in opening 4 new oil bourses in 2006? This is unprecedented. If the world traded oil on two exchanges since hitler was a corporal, why the sudden emergence of all these new bourses in the same year, 2006?

(2) What are the odds that they will all only trade in dollars?
Last edited by seahorse2 on Thu 23 Mar 2006, 15:14:41, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby LadyRuby » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 15:03:32

I have no answers just questions too.

Are they all scrambling to get their foot in the door first?

Another question, can they change from trading in dollars to euros at will if the situation warranted it?
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby Petrodollar » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 16:11:23

seahorse2,
I'll try to answer your question, but first, I think their are over 180 misc. exchanges around the world, but only a few of them deal with international oil and gas trades. The two "biggies" that drive the price of crude oil are of course NYMEX and IPE.

Interest in these energy bourses are due to the desire to control the money flows of oil - which represented tremendous power in the 20th century. The first person to realize this was a young man in the 1870s by the name of John D. Rockefeller. He went on to become the first American billionaire, and monopolized the oil price with his famous firm - Standard Oil {until it was broken up by Teddy Roosevelt}.

Fast-forwarding to today, with Peak Oil approaching, we can expect more economic and political power to flow to the Middle East and perhaps Russia as the major oil producers. The host of new US military bases in the Middle East and Central Asia region is acknowledgement of this new dynamic.

As for your questions, I am obviously more familiar with Iran's interest in an oil bourse - and I suspect it was Tehran's plans that have spurned interest in other new bourses (Dubai's exchange did not deal with energy, but obviously that is changing). In essence, these stock exchanges are about control. There is some belief, especially in the Middle East, that the New York and London exchanges "manipulate" the price of oil to some degree (increasing volatility), but now that the US and UK are no longer major oil exporters, some of the pricing power should shift to the remaining producers..at least that is how I read the sentiments.

Here's how Dr. Asemipur has termed it (the man repsonsible for setting up the Kish International Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Bourse, or IOB):

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')The exchange will play an important role in increasing [Iran's] GDP and foreign exchange revenues, making trading transparent, providing experience in oil trading and risk management, and establishing a regional and international market."

As to the estimated financial turnover, Asemipur said: "The maximum financial turnover in the oil exchange - based on the National [Iranian] Oil Company's total revenue of 60bn dollars last year and the 20bn dollars from the sale of petrochemical products over the next 10 years, and assuming a minimum trading of 10 times - will exceed 800bn dollars per year which will play a fundamental role in the growth of the gross domestic product."


{$800 billion over 10 years is not an insignificant amount for a country such as Iran}

Here's how the director of IS for the INOC views the oil bourse:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')oseyn Talebi, director of management information systems of the National Iranian Oil Company and member of specialized and technical committee of the oil exchange. In one interview, Talebi said among other things: "In addition to physical transactions, paper deals will be carried out. Another method is optional transactions which are used to offset the risk from severe change in purchased oil price. In Iran, we are deprived of revenues resulting from future and optional deals and most of them are done in other counties; for example, IPE in England or NYMEX in the United States or even SIMEX in Singapore. This is important both economically and strategically because those markets will attract customers and we, as a major player in the region, will lose benefits. Therefore, establishment of oil bourse is a national necessity."


Lastly, here is how the deputy head of Kish Free Zone Organization(KFZO), Abdolrahman Nadimi, stated the Iran oil bourse will benefit Iran's economy:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Kish Oil Bourse Essential
Iran Daily
December 26, 2005

....The official stated that stock exchange and the establishment of a number of foreign banks branches in Kish, an international oil-gas and petrochemical bourse would significantly help develop the island's economy and transform Iran into an active country in the field of international oil transactions. Nadimi pointed to the strategic location of Kishin the Persian Gulf, which holds 65 percent of the world's energy reserves, adding the island is an important base for companies involved in oil and gas projects."


I should note that only the Iranian's are suggesting a euro-based oil transaction system, and I doubt Qatar (which is a US military colony) will use euros, and the same goes for Dubai. Speaking of control, their is also a political reason for Iran's desire to use euros.

Tehran’s interest in converting all of their oil transactions to the euro, is in part due to political blowback created after President Bush named Iran as part of an “Axis of Evil" in his State of the Union speech. Just a few months before Iran was providing assistance to the US in the campaign agianst the Taliban, who the Iranians despised. Tehran even made the unusal offer to help rescue any downed US airforce crews during the October 2001 air campaign over Afghanistan. This was a diplomatic gesture, but getting labeled as "evil" a few months later shocked Tehran and the relationship has suffered ever since.

Anyhow, revenue from Iran's daily crude sale is transferred through a series of intermediary banks, mostly European. According to international bankers, all transactions involving large amounts of dollars are cleared through "master" accounts held in New York, and the New York Federal Reserve has access to information about such transfers. {I did not realize this phenomenon until I read the below article)

Apparently Iran is concerned that the Bush administration may interfere with Iranian’s oil revenue transfers. In 2002 an Iranian oil industry source stated,

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')s a precaution, the Central Bank of Iran is looking into a switch away from dollar payments — with the euro a favoured alternative…The US is keen to know who is sending and receiving dollars and they may make it difficult to transfer our money, especially when they know it is for Iran.


A senior banker in this Alexander Oil & Gas article acknowledged “After September 11, US authorities were chasing terrorist funds and they were questioning a lot of things…There were many wild goose chases.”

Source: “Iran may switch to euro for crude sale payments,” Alexander’s Oil & Gas, September 5, 2002. http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntm23638.htm

Apparently some of these bankers have felt particularly hassled by Washington’s “war of words on Tehran.” That rhetoric only encouraged Tehran to increase the pace of its ongoing plans regarding euro-based oil transactions. Here's what a recent Iranian article stated on this subject:

http://iran-daily.com/1384/2515/html/ec ... tm#s131169

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Ending $ Monopoly
Azam Mohebbi
March 6, 2006

...The Oil, Gas and Petrochemical Bourse, which will be established as envisaged in the Fourth Five-Year Plan (2005-2010), has received support from both the Parliament and the government. It will also enable oil-rich Iran to regulate prices at home without having to follow other countries’ dollar-based trading system.

Iran’s Oil Bourse can help the world oil market get rid of the present dollar monopoly--what many observers think will put the global status of the major currency at risk.

World oil prices are set in London and New York today where OPEC member-states do not have a decisive role.

Experts believe that once the Caspian Sea oil producing countries also join Iran’s Oil Bourse, world oil market is likely to experience a revolution.

Proponents of the Oil Bourse believe that oil producing countries need to take such an important initiative notwithstanding the risks and barriers.

They believe that OPEC member-states have lost 72 percent of their nominal revenues on the fall in the value of the dollar and their declining purchasing power. {note: I assume that percentage reflects the dollar against a basket of several international currencies over a 30 year period? begining back in 1975 when OPEC agreed to dollar only pricing and transactions}

One thing to remember is that OPEC countries receive dollars for their oil exports and will have to spend the same dollars in trade transactions with countries whose currencies are rivaling the greenback all the time.

Kamal Daneshyar, a senior parliamentarian, contended that the Oil Bourse will help promote Iran’s petroleum business as it will attract customers from around the world.

Iranian authorities are optimistic that the Oil Bourse will provide many countries with an opportunity to trade oil with currencies other than the US dollar.

This optimism also applies to the European Union, which is one of the largest energy consumers in the world and whose currency the euro is the proposed alternative to the dollar.



The short Russian new story from a few months ago does not have enough details to make any conclusions, but given that over 2/3's of its oil exports go to the EU, a euro-based system would be logical from an economic and monetary perspective - but you can be sure that any such decision would met with "great opposition" from the US (quoting a member of the CFR). So, it's too early to say what if anything will come of the Russian anoucement, but I will reiterate what the late/former head of the ECB stated in Oct 2003 about petroeuro pricing being "sensible."

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]European Central Bank believes pricing oil in euros is sensible

14-10-03 European Central Bank (ECB)President William Duisenberg said that it might make sense for Russia to sell oil in euros to certain EU customers, entering a debate sparked that has big implications for currency markets. Asked to comment on remarks by President Vladimir Putin that he did not rule out switching Russia's oil pricing from dollars to euros, Duisenberg said this could particularly suit the nations currently lining up to join the common currency block.

"It would be in their interest to pay for imports in their future domestic currencies," he told. "We are worried about the situation in countries that depend on imports of oil from Russia," he was quoted as saying. The agency also cited him as saying, however, that if Russia made a move to the euro it would be a unilateral decision.

Russia is the world's second-largest exporter of oil after Saudi Arabia and the world's top gas exporter. A switch would be a powerful symbolic victory for the euro and might accelerate its growing role as an international reserve currency to challenge the dominance of the dollar.


What I find most surprising is this week's annoucement by Qatar. Could this annoucement - on the very day the IOB was originally scheduled to open (March 21) - be some sort of clever attempt by the US client state (Qatar) to "pre-empt" the emergence of the Iranian/Kish International Oil Bourse? That is just speculation, but I had never heard of Qatar's plans until yesterday, and you can be sure that Qatar will utilize a dollar-denominated trading system (fyi: US CENTCOM is headquartered in Qatar...and it was the lauchpad of the 2003 Iraq invasion).

Well, that's my 2ct on this issue for now.
Last edited by Petrodollar on Thu 23 Mar 2006, 18:10:45, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Petrodollar
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maryland
Top

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 17:06:01

Interesting and thanks
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby LadyRuby » Thu 23 Mar 2006, 17:23:29

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', 'I')nteresting and thanks


I'll second that!
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US
Top

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby Euric » Mon 27 Mar 2006, 01:14:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse2', 'T')he new oil bourses springing up show economic/political power is shifting from West to East -basically from previous oil exporters (US and UK) to the last remaining oil exporters (Russia and OPEC).

Russian to open oil bourse: Novosti

Qatar to open oil bourse:

Xinhua

Kish proposed oil bourse (can't tell if this is one and the same as the proposed Iranian oil bourse)

Kish News

Proposed Iranian oil bourse:

Globe&Mall.com



Is the interest by these nations opening their own bourse a recent interest or has it been there for some time? I'm just wondering if the interest might be the result in the anti-foreign reaction of the American citizens of a UAE company operating its ports. The Arabs and others may have come to realize that the US is not that hot of an investment and have decided it is best not to let the US control the pricing of their oil.
User avatar
Euric
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat 04 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Top

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse » Mon 27 Mar 2006, 09:23:40

Sorry, I don't know how long these bourses have been in the planning.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse » Mon 27 Mar 2006, 09:28:00

Sorry, I don't know how long these bourses have been in the planning.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby Petrodollar » Mon 27 Mar 2006, 09:45:50

seahorse,
The Dubai exchange has been around for a few years, but not an energy bourse, and the recent annoncement suggests an expansion of its trade commodities into energy.

As far as I know, the Qatar energy bourse is a new item. It will take time for them to bring this project into fruition, and I should note the Iranians have been working on their project for 2.5 years at a minimum, possibly longer.

The Russian exchange might be for domestic trades only, denominated in roubles, but that is just my impression thus far. Hope that info helped.
User avatar
Petrodollar
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby MrBill » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 09:19:11

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')ussian to open oil bourse: Novosti


Well, the first thing you need to remember about Russia is that a lot more legislation gets drafted than passed by Parliment/Duma, and that a lot of laws get passed by law makers than get implemented by the government in practice, and then even those are subject to funding restrictions and uneven enforcement.

I have not personally seen any draft laws to do with oil & gas futures & options trading in Russia, although we are very active on the RTS & Micex, and belong to one of Russia's largest oil companies. This may be for physical delivery of products to various sites similar to ARA (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp) for Continental crude & refining activities.

I do know that the NYMEX is planning offer a Urals grade contract in the future (again, announced, but no concrete details), and if one of the delivery point is in Russia, then Russia would need suitable regulations to cover such contracts.

After the Russian debt crisis in 1998, non-deliverable forward contracts (NDFs), or contracts for differences, were ruled illegal prompting force majeure amoung counterparts who used these contracts to hedge against the Russian ruble. Thereafter there has always remained a legal blackhole for all contracts for differences, as the end price is not known when the contract is struck, and therefore the Russian courts took the view that they were gambling contracts and therefore null & void.

This is precisely the reason that I work for a Russian company in Cyprus. We are able to strike legally binding contracts under EU or UK law, which would not be possible or enforceable onshore in Russia. So if Russia hopes to create a Ural delivery point for either the cash or futures market they need to have legislation that underpins its legality. Similar regulations for capital controls, and the Russian ruble market, are planned for 2007 (if implemented on time).

However, in my opinion this is not an oil bourse in the traditional sense of the word like the ICE or NYMEX, as there are only a handful of private oil companies in Russia; Gazprom and its entities are government owned and controlled; and the only pipeline company is government controlled, so a freely traded futures & options market is not possible as too many of the too few players would have inordinate power to influence prices. And delivery by train, barge or pipeline is also directly or indirectly controlled by the government or by government licensed monopolies. Therefore true price discovery is not possible, but fulfillment of commerical delivery contracts certainly might be.

As why would anyone want an exchange? High paying jobs for one. Prestige for another. Why do so many European governments resist integration in financial markets and true consolidation? Because it might mean their national champion loses out to a cross border rival. So instead of one large Continental exchange we see a lot of virtual partnerships and endless rivalries between the DBC, Euronext and the LSE, etc.

As for Dubai, Dubai has long worked hard to establish themselves as a banking and finance centre for the ME in the ME, but this process has been going on, successfully for years and the DiFX/DIFC is just one example of that. An oil contract is just another product to add to their mix. Dubai is already a benchmark ME grade for crude. And, as there is no effective oil market in the Asian time zone, it may well bridge a gap in the market between the NY close and the start of trading in the European time zone as they are what 4 time zones east of London and 9 ahead of NY? I hope to be there in April or May to meet with investors, so will know more then.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 12:31:51

Mr. Bill,

I don't understand all the oil trading agreements etc that are necessary to open a bourse similar to the Nymex, other than I can appreciate it is very complex.

That being said, from the article on the Russian bourse, I didn't take it to be anything simlar to the Nymex, and in fact, seemed to be geared towards internal Russian affairs.

It seems interesting to me, though, that in the "big picture" we know see more bourses, even if they are specialized, opening at the same time that nonopec oil is depleting. Its interesting that all the proposed bourses are in countries which are still exporters of oil, not importers of oil. It evidences a shift in economic/political power, albeit slowly.

In line with this was a report from the CIBC last year, wherein the analyst saw a "risk" that the Canadian looney could become the world's reserve currency - if I remember correctly bc of the stable democratic Canadian system with lots of natural resourses (i.e. tar sands). The looney has been rising in value over the last year.

All this suggest that economic/political power follows oil. Reagan won the cold war by bankrupting the Soviet Union by flooding the world with cheap oil. However, the cheap oil days are over, and the Russians are rising with a vengeance on the world stage - look at the current negotiations at the UN over Iraq? Natural gas in Ukraine? Natural gas shut off to Georgia, the natural gas umbilical cord from Russia to the EU in general.

The economics and politics are shifting, probably quicker than people could imagine. The Ukraine was a small hint of what's to come, same with the oil bourses. Power is shifting to the east.

Further, I'm not suggesting a "conspiracy" by making the next comment, but this power shift to the east, these bourses all coming online at the same time, within the next two years or so, certainly isn't going to benefit the United States and its dollar. A lot will change in the next two years, the United States could easily be bankrupt, and the rest of the world is slowly weaning itself off of the US umbilical cord.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby Petrodollar » Thu 30 Mar 2006, 10:48:45

Interesting article on the bourse via BBC monitoring via COMTEX ...

Russian pundit says USA fears Iranian oil exchange plans
(March 28, 2006)

http://news.tradingcharts.com/futures/0 ... .html?mpop
User avatar
Petrodollar
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue 19 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maryland

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse2 » Thu 30 Mar 2006, 18:38:03

Qatar launches "energy city."

Global Reserch
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 01:48:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n line with this was a report from the CIBC last year, wherein the analyst saw a "risk" that the Canadian looney could become the world's reserve currency - if I remember correctly bc of the stable democratic Canadian system with lots of natural resourses (i.e. tar sands). The looney has been rising in value over the last year.


With all due respect to CIBC and my fellow countrymen, that is not a very intelligent comment. There is a world of difference between having a strong currency which holds its value in good times and in bad and having the economic might and the will to be the world's reserrve currency. If you know anything at all about Canadians and Canadian politics you will know that they are very apathetic and are not interested in being the world's central bankers.

The Canadian dollar used to be worth more than the US dollar, then a lot less, now they are climbing back to about where they were in the early 1990's. I do not see much risk in the next year or two that the Canadian dollar will be stronger than the US dollar? And if even as strong as par, Canadian manufacturing will suffer just as much as UK manufacturing has with Sterling so strong.

But if your point is that exporters of natural resources, especially oil & gas, have strong currencies and their economies are benefiting from inflows of cash from their exports then I agree. I would be surprised if it was otherwise. This phenonoma has been witnessed time and again and is behind what became to be known as The Dutch Disease where oil & gas revenues from the offshore Holland pushed up the value of the Dutch guilder, without a corresponding increase in labor productivity, and thus choked non oil & gas related activity off resulting in slow growth and higher unemployment even though the external receipts looked good.

The US is suffering from massive, in real terms, in historic terms, by any measurement you wish to employ, current account, budget and trade deficits. It is not so much that they are consumers of oil. China, Japan and Germany are also net consumers of oil. They also have the largest economies in the world along with the USA.

The fact that power is shifting from the West to Asia was noticed quite a long time ago with the emergence of the Asian Tigers. This enthusiasm for the Asian Century only waned somewhat following the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Now growth in Asia is back at the fore. It has nothing to do with 2006 and the current price of oil. The current price of oil reflects strong growth, much of which is coming from emerging countries. But as has been noticed, that growth is based partially on US consumption and certainly economies like Germany's benefit as they produce the machines that they sell to the Asians which allow them to compete successfully in the world economy. I see a web of tangled relationships and not a series of binomial factors at work here.

OPEC producers tended to waste previous oil windfalls. They paid dearly for that when the price of oil declined. They have become more sophisticated and they are determined to avoid those problems this time around while prices are high. Therefore they are lookign to the future and putting in place institutions and infrastructure to give them more of a say of how their oil revenues are saved, invested and spent in more intelligent ways. This is a sign of economic maturiy. Better than white elephant projects and buiding the world's tallest sky scrapers in the middle of the desert. This should help them prepare better for their future whether oil prices stay high or not.

Well, gotta hop. Talk to you later. Cheers.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby seahorse » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 09:21:14

Mr. Bill,

It seems that there is a lot of power that flows from being a net oil exporter, although I agree that there is more to being a world economic/political power than having a lot of oil (Japan for example). However, historically, until the 70s, America had a lot of power. It could be argued that a lack of oil was a reason for Germany's downfall in WWII and Japan's downfall, certainly it was a serious weakness for them. After that, America rose to power in part bc of its plentiful oil resources.

Now, the US is hurting in part bc of its large trade deficit, and its my understanding that about 60% of that trade deficit is the cost of oil, so, it seems a lack of oil causes or can cause serious economic problems which inevitable lead to a lack of political/economic power.

I also agree that smart management of what one does have it may be possible to overcome some of those shortages, but Japan has been able to rely on American defense spending and China's standard of living is so low that it produces a lot of goods but, economic power akin to the US back in the late 60s or 70s? Not there yet. If they had lots of cheap oil, I think it would be different for the Chinese.
User avatar
seahorse
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Fri 15 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Arkansas

Re: New Oil Bourses show power shifting from West to East

Unread postby MrBill » Fri 31 Mar 2006, 10:30:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('seahorse', 'M')r. Bill,

It seems that there is a lot of power that flows from being a net oil exporter, although I agree that there is more to being a world economic/political power than having a lot of oil (Japan for example). However, historically, until the 70s, America had a lot of power. It could be argued that a lack of oil was a reason for Germany's downfall in WWII and Japan's downfall, certainly it was a serious weakness for them. After that, America rose to power in part bc of its plentiful oil resources.

Now, the US is hurting in part bc of its large trade deficit, and its my understanding that about 60% of that trade deficit is the cost of oil, so, it seems a lack of oil causes or can cause serious economic problems which inevitable lead to a lack of political/economic power.

I also agree that smart management of what one does have it may be possible to overcome some of those shortages, but Japan has been able to rely on American defense spending and China's standard of living is so low that it produces a lot of goods but, economic power akin to the US back in the late 60s or 70s? Not there yet. If they had lots of cheap oil, I think it would be different for the Chinese.


The US imports roughly 10 mbpdoe per week, which at today's price of $66 is $4.620 bio per week or $240 bio per year. That is a lot of money, but not the $782 bio annual trade deficit the US occurred in 2005. Even if oil imports rise closer to 12 mbpdoe per week that would be roughly $288.3 bio per year, of which at least some is coming in courteous of US owned oil companies who are reporting income and paying dividends domestically in the US to investors. To be sure these are not small or insignificant numbers, but they are not 60% of the US total import bill either. Still I take your point. Energy is the biggest business that there is. Who controls the pipes has a lot of influence.





As for China. A manufacturing powerhouse for many reasons, not least of all 8 million of under-utilized rural labor flooding into the cities each year in search of work that keep wages some of the lowest in the world. However, their industrial policy is also based being the lowest cost producer in the world. They too will encounter bottlenecks along the road that will also hamper their competitiveness, not least of which will be a lack of their own natural resources. But don't forget being the lowest cost producer also means they are not fully factoring in their long term cost of capital, all of their fixed costs and accounting for environmental degradation and other future liabilities. Not to mention an industrial policy not based on the cost of capital tends to misallocate it and in China we see a lot of evidence of over investment in the wrong areas and leading to destabilizing/loss making over capacity in some sectors.

In all fairness, American accounting practices, especially as they relate to future liabilities, like pensions and healthcare benefits for retirees, are not very adequate either, but on a scale of 1:10, China is a 1 and the US is a 6 if one can make such a rude comparison without having any numbers to hand to back such a claim. And China uses more energy per unit of output than the US or G7 average, so their continued performance requires ever cheaper labor to make up for increased costs of production elsewhere to maintain existing margins, but as we know the price of finished manufacturing goods is falling in real terms even as import costs of commodities are rising.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top


Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron