Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Oil Field Exploration declines

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Oil Field Exploration declines

Unread postby nero » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 12:14:32

Interesting data from IHS energy: The major international oil companies' new field wildcats were down again in 2005. It was 39% below the level of international exploration conducted in 1994. The three super majors, Total, Shell and Exxon look like they are getting out of the exploration business altogether. They are down a whopping 80% from 1994 levels. Certainly don't see the higher price levels leading to increased exploration. I wonder how economists explain that! IHS Energy (pdf)
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby seahorse2 » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 12:23:30

Nero,

Don't bother us with facts, they seem to get in the way, like dropping a banana peel on the dance room floor.

Okay, Lynch told me to tell you, young Grasshopper, that the answer is obvious: increased technology has made wildcatting much more efficient, therefore, less wildcats have to be drilled to find more oil.
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 13:14:50

Yes....this is important information. The folks at IHS Energy have been saying for the last three years that if exploration does not pick up in the very near future we are going to be in deep trouble....basically accelerating peak oil to the point where we will definitely only be dealing with 2 trillion barrels. With exploration at all time lows it is pretty hard to argue that we've done everything to find all of the remaining oil. Sooner or later this is going to have to change but as IHS Energy points out elsewhere the access to areas with high potential is currently not there.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 13:24:13

Wait a minute.
I thought one of the reasons for this was that the majors were allowing the juniors to play that game, and then they come along and gobble them up?
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby Leanan » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 13:59:06

Interesting report. Thanks for the link!

BalticMan over at TOD says there's an article called "Energy, an Aging Bull" in the latest Barron's. It's an interview with Art Smith, chairman & CEO of John S. Herold Inc., which maintains a database on publicly-held oil companies. It's subscription-only, alas, but he quoted these bits:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Another issue is in order to prolong a period of rising production and demand, you have to increasingly build up the amount of reserves. In other words, producing 85 million a barrels is equivalent to 30 billion barrels a year. We are not finding 30 billion barrels. We are finding perhaps maybe 10 billion barrels of new oil."

"Q: Why haven't they run up?

A: They are not growing. That's the No. 1 issue. The industry is really having a difficult time just holding its own, much less growing. The primary way they deliver value to shareholders is through dividends and share repurchases. The growth they can show is per-share growth. We are hard pressed to find companies that have much in the way of anticipated volume, meaning increased production over existing declines."
"The problems of today will not be solved by the same thinking that produced the problems in the first place." - Albert Einstein
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby nero » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 14:20:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', 'W')ait a minute.
I thought one of the reasons for this was that the majors were allowing the juniors to play that game, and then they come along and gobble them up?


The chart does show that the majors are decreasing faster than others but even the overall international wildcat drill rate is down about 25% since 2001. This is especially striking when you consider over that period of time the 5 year futures contract for oil has basically tripled. No one is stepping up and doing the exploration required to discover the new fields that will come online in 5 years time. This partially explains the low discovery rate over the past couple of years. They really haven't been looking that hard.
Biofuels: The "What else we got to burn?" answer to peak oil.
User avatar
nero
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1433
Joined: Sat 22 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby Spideykid » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 14:49:19

Lets see the oil companies have probably checked 99% of all the likely areas where there is good chance you can get a good amount of recoverable oil, so how much exploration do you need for places that are not likely going to have much recoverable oil?
User avatar
Spideykid
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Fri 22 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby 0mar » Tue 28 Mar 2006, 16:27:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Spideykid', 'L')ets see the oil companies have probably checked 99% of all the likely areas where there is good chance you can get a good amount of recoverable oil, so how much exploration do you need for places that are not likely going to have much recoverable oil?


I very much doubt they have checked 99% of all likely areas.

It's just that the best prospects left in the world aren't very ripe, compared to a decade or three ago.
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby seahorse2 » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 13:28:55

Rockdoc,

I noticed that you have roughly estimated a peak oil date of 2014. If the wildcat trend continues to drop (implying a drop in discoveries), would this change your rough estimate of PO? If so, how much could it change?

Thanks
User avatar
seahorse2
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 2042
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: new field wildcats trend

Unread postby rockdoc123 » Wed 29 Mar 2006, 15:53:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') noticed that you have roughly estimated a peak oil date of 2014. If the wildcat trend continues to drop (implying a drop in discoveries), would this change your rough estimate of PO? If so, how much could it change?


Just to clarify I haven't done much of the analysis myself....just a bit of quality control and plotting on the numbers I pilfered from IHS and WoodMac. Both of these analyses only take into account existing discoveries and developments that have been announced with more or less definitive timelines. The problem with any exploration happening from a go forward point is that there is anywhere from 3 years to 5 years lag time generally from discovery to production (3 years is pretty aggressive). And usually it takes a year or two to bring any field up to peak or plateau rates. As a consequence you have to assume that anything found in 2006 isn't going to have an affect until 2010 - 2012. I'd have to look at the numbers but I suspect with the amount of year on year depletion you see past peak you will need a fair bit of discovery to extend it very much. Mind you neither IHS nor WoodMac take into account non-conventional production such as tar sands and oil shales (which is why the CERI analysis is so different I think).
Short answer would be you need to ask Taskforce_Unity or someone else who has the modeling thing wired.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron