Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Book: "Mao, the Unknown Story" by J & J Halliday

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Book: "Mao, the Unknown Story" by J & J Halliday

Unread postby lorenzo » Thu 16 Mar 2006, 10:22:55

I'm just reading the fascinating but highly biased Mao biography, written by Jung Chang and her husband Jon Halliday. Mao, the man who ruled over a quarter of the world's population for over a quarter of a century. Probably the most powerful man ever to walk this earth.

In it, I discovered a set of historic actions, taken by the Chairman, that were all directed at producing massive amounts of bioethanol, with horrible consequences for millions of people. I thought it'd be nice to share it with you.

(For those who don't want to follow the entire development, scroll down to § 7)

1. Let's start at the chapter when Mao has just conquered China and ousted Chiang Kai Shek, with help of the Russians: Mao wants Stalin to offer him as many heavy arms factories as possible, so he can start to consolidate his power.

2. In order to do so, Mao uses all kinds of threats and tells Stalin that he will not hesitate to go to war with the Americans, which means the latter would also fight the Soviets. This is Stalin's worst nightmare at that time, so he caves in and starts giving Mao a large number of arms factories.

3. Mao's consolidating, but he feels he wants more. After all he's a megalomaniac. So he decides to create the Korean War. Same logic: Mao tells Stalin he can sacrifice millions of Chinese 'volunteers' to 'slaughter' thousands of Americans for years on end - which is what happens - so that Stalin doesn't have to go in and deal with the problem himself. All this, provided Stalin offers him something in return. Stalin takes the bait and keeps satisfying Mao by sending him MIGs and more heavy arms factories, to keep the war in Korea going.

4. Stalin feels he's losing too much though and orders Mao to halt the war in Korea. Mao obeys. Shortly after, Stalin dies and Mao thinks this is his chance to become the leader of the communist world, instead of Krushchev. But realistically speaking, the Soviets have much more military power, so Mao understands he needs the same amount of it, before attempting the 'coup'.

5. So he tries and succeeds in blackmailing Krushchev into helping Mao realise his "Super Power Dream". Mao wants the Bomb. And he's determined to get it. From one day to another, thousands of Chinese nuclear scientists are trained, and all skills, material resources and knowledge for Mao's Bomb are transferred from the USSR to China. Experts at that time already said China was not ready for the Bomb, that it would cost way too much. Unless of course some nuthead would find money in China where others could not. The nuthead was Mao, and he found the money.

6. Mao's main drive was to create a military superpower that could conquer the entire planet. And he was ready to sacrifice the Chinese people for it. Because after all, he didn't get a free ride and had to pay the Soviets for their technology and their arms factories. So Mao started levying incredible 'taxes', which came down to forcing millions of farmers to hand in all their agricultural production, part of which was then sold on the international market, or given away to the Soviets. Hundreds of thousands of farmers starved to death. Mao didn't care, he hated farmers.

7. Mao calculated that he might die before seeing China owning the Bomb and plenty of Missiles. So he sped up agricultural production (with which to pay the Soviets). In 1958, he launched his infamous and megalomaniacal 'Great Leap Forward', of which he said that 'half of all Chinamen may have to die' in order to reach the targets of the program.
This is where the ethanol comes in. Part of the program consisted of doubling the production of grain, in order to produce ethanol, 'which we can use to power our test rockets and to drive our cars'. [see the book, chapter 40, in the dutch version at page 549; English version I don't know, but check under footnote 22 of that chapter].
Each rocket test consumed 10 million tons of grain. Enough to feed 2 million Chinese farmers for a year. Mao preferred the rockets over the farmers.

8. The first tests were successful, so Mao wanted to convert even more grain into ethanol, while the people were starving. All the Chairman's projects that became famous for their disastrous results, fit in this secret Super Power agenda of his, part of which consisted of producing ordinary ethanol.
-Grand Canals were built by slaves, to bring water to agricultural zones. Most of those canals were badly planned and terminated before they reached their goal. Thousands died in vain building them.
-Huge water reservoirs and dams were built, thousands of which exist until this day, but are considered to be 'hazards' by the current Chinese government. One of those dams collapsed in 1975, killing over 200,000 people, the worst disaster in its kind.
-Mao ordered farmers to plant much more grain on an acre, without using fertilizer. It didn't work, harvests failed. So Mao just ordered farmers to hand in the little grain they did harvest, because he wanted to reach his ethanol target. The result: hundreds of thousands died, once more.
-We know the story: Mao ordered to kill all sparrows because sparrows steal too much grain. Sparrows are 'counter-revolutionary birds'. The result: the pests that were normally contained by the sparrows, now flourished, creating more damage than anticipated.

These are just some of the absurd sub-programs launched by the crazy Chairman. At the core of those was the goal to produce food for exports, the money of which was transferred to the Soviets, and to produce Mao's ethanol, which was used to power test rockets and cars.
Voilà. A historic tidbit of information, which I thought is interesting for us, because we talk about ethanol and mega-farming projects so often nowadays. Nowhere do we find a better illustration of how farming-for-energy at the detriment of farming-for-food can have disastrous effects and kill people.

Mao, the Unknown Story, Jung Chang and Jon Halliday, 2005.
Last edited by Ferretlover on Sun 07 Feb 2010, 19:30:29, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: Moved to the Book / Media Review forum.
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby The_Virginian » Fri 17 Mar 2006, 23:57:46

Facinating.

Thank you for the daily lesson....you have brought proof that their is nothing new under the sun...

I too worry about the ethanol vs. crop production...

Water is an issue, even with the USA having large Lakes ("great" lakes etc.), much of the interior is too dry to sustain the masive amount needed on a yearly bassis.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby Magus » Sat 18 Mar 2006, 02:54:44

Great read! Brought to my attention some things I didn't know about Mao and that period of Chinese history.

Just more evidence that proves that dependence on ethanol as a fuel source would be a very BAD idea.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')'m just reading the fascinating but highly biased Mao biography, written by Jung Chang and her husband Jon Halliday.


Bias? Or truth?
Last edited by Magus on Sat 18 Mar 2006, 03:10:24, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Magus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sat 18 Feb 2006, 04:00:00
Location: Earth

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby mrflora » Sat 18 Mar 2006, 14:56:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ach rocket test consumed 10 million tons of grain. Enough to feed 2 million Chinese farmers for a year. Mao preferred the rockets over the farmers.


There's got to be something wrong with these numbers. A ballistic missile like the Atlas of 1950's vintage would contain about 100 tons of fuel at launch. Surely even Mao's engineers wouldn't use 10 million tons of grain to produce 100 tons of ethanol! Also that is 5 tons of grain (10,000 lbs) to feed one farmer for a year, or over 25 lbs. per day. Talk about overweight Americans! Those Chinese farmers make us look anorexic!

Regards,
M.R.F.
User avatar
mrflora
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby The_Virginian » Sat 18 Mar 2006, 18:08:12

Just some speculation:

yes, except humans don't live on grain alone...animals (even in mao's China) for consumption and transpot/plowing take food as well.

using the land to grow ethanol instead of traditional farming means planting such higher yeild variaties with great care...specialized mono-culture.

doubtful weather the Chinese farmer got such yeilds from his land under more traditional methods....thus the high yeilds that look impressive per person.

Ok now for some Figures:

Hey look how much grain it takes to make beer in the USA!

Beer the ultimate Luxury Food....Got Beer?

492,862, 087 pounds of grain and Malt (a more proccesed grain product that conceils even MORE usage than the numbers attest) went into making just 15,359,226 pounds of beer.

Thats a 'ell of a lot of grain for my brewski's.

Beer is 3.2-6% Alcohol. kind of like just taking the fermented grain without distilling. You should be able to get 15-18% alcohol before the yeast die off with the proper strains of yeast.

In fact the Reinhietsgebot (bavarian purity law of 1516) was meant to keep grains form ending up as party drink:

"The legendary Bavarian Purity Law of 1516, known in German as the Reinheitsgebot.


The short version of this law, which was enacted on April 23, 1516 by Bavarian Duke Wilhelm IV (a.k.a. William IV), is that beer may contain only three ingredients: barley, hops, and water. Ostensibly, this makes the law one of the oldest “consumer protection” regulations, instilling confidence in purchasers that the beer they get will contain no questionable grains or additives. (Among the additives the law sought to ban were some commonly-used herbs that had hallucinogenic effects.) But in fact, the bit about beer ingredients was simply one sentence in a much longer ordinance that primarily specified beer pricing regulations. The intention of the law was not only to ensure the quality of the beer and control pricing, but also to guarantee that more valuable grains such as wheat and rye, which were needed for bread and often in short supply, were not used for beermaking. This was not actually the first law of its kind, either—similar ordinances date back as far as 1165—but it was the first to apply to all of Bavaria, and the oldest such regulation still in force today."


So the competion between bread or Alcohol is not so new... (although one must admit Beer has nutritional value, while fuel ethanol robs one of B vitamins etc.)

Final Point....those numbers may not be so far off...cetainly estimations, but possibly correct ones.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby lorenzo » Mon 20 Mar 2006, 16:43:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mrflora', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')ach rocket test consumed 10 million tons of grain. Enough to feed 2 million Chinese farmers for a year. Mao preferred the rockets over the farmers.


There's got to be something wrong with these numbers. A ballistic missile like the Atlas of 1950's vintage would contain about 100 tons of fuel at launch. Surely even Mao's engineers wouldn't use 10 million tons of grain to produce 100 tons of ethanol! Also that is 5 tons of grain (10,000 lbs) to feed one farmer for a year, or over 25 lbs. per day. Talk about overweight Americans! Those Chinese farmers make us look anorexic!

Regards,
M.R.F.


You're right, obviously, it's not 10 million tons, it's 10 million kilos, 10 000 tons. But still, the significance of the entire venture is clear: Mao preferred to use food as fuel, while the world's worst famine was happening.


For accuracy's sake, here's what the text says (I'm translating from the Dutch edition, maybe someone with an English version could double check):

page 549:

"Moreover, food served as raw material for the nuclear program which needed high quality fuel. Grain was used to produce the purest alcohol. On september the 8th [1959] Mao told the Supreme Council, after he had claimed that there was plenty of food, that "we must find industrial applications for grain, for example in the form of alcohol as fuel." And thus grain was used for experiments with missiles, each of which consumed 10 million kilo's of grain, enough to prevent the survival of one to two million people for an entire year."

The authors say the ethanol grain could have helped millions survive, because it would have meant that the diet they were forced to die on, would have become one on which they could live.

page 561: in 1960, women in cities received 1200 calories per day maximum. Farmers received 1500 calories per day. Not enough to survive on for most.
The authors compare: "prisoners in Auschwitz received between 1300 and 1700 calories per day."
The grain that was wasted on ethanol could have made the difference between life and death.
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Mao's ethanol

Unread postby lorenzo » Mon 20 Mar 2006, 17:04:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Magus', '
')Bias? Or truth?


The problem is that the facts are probably correct, but Jung Chang's interpretation of those facts creates very strange consequences for the reader.

Jung Chang hates Mao, no doubt about that. She tells us that she's revealing a great secret, namely that Mao's economic plans (the Great Leap Forward) were all intended to rob the Chinese of their food in order to pay the Soviets for military goods. She continuously stresses this fact.

The strange effect of this logic is that she presents Mao as a great but perverse economist. Previous interpretations of the Great Leap Forward and the first Five Year Plan were that Mao was simply a bad planner and an idiot when it comes to basic economic realities. And that his bad planning turned into a famine.

Jung Chang's interpretation shows Mao as an economic genius, because she continuously stresses how successful he was in producing more food than ever before. The Great Leap Forward was not a disaster, as conventional historiography has it, instead it was a huge success -- that's what the reader concludes.

[Obviously, Jung Chang's version makes Mao an evil genius, while other versions saw Mao as a good man who simply didn't understand economics.]


The same is true for Chang's interpretation of Mao's relationship with the Soviets. She continuously tells the reader that Mao "used" the Soviets for his own goals, and how evil and cunning he was in doing so, even tricking Stalin and Krushev. Again, this lets the reader conclude that Mao was indeed a genius, albeit an evil one.

When one reads a biography of a politician, one expects to read how well he coped with "power". Jung Chang's intention is to make Mao look weak, but she actually gives the reader all the ingredients to conclude the opposite!

Jung Chang's entire attempt at making Mao look bad, fails a bit because of this logic. The reader continuously gets the impression that Mao was indeed an incredibly intelligent man who understood power and economics better than anyone else. So you get the strange impression that Mao was a man with 'skills'.

The book's plenty of this kind of details, where Chang tries to get the reader to hate Mao, while the opposite happens.
User avatar
lorenzo
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2184
Joined: Sat 01 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top


Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron