by Raxozanne » Wed 08 Mar 2006, 10:18:23
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', 'W')hy population will never be steady state, at least not on a global level:
If each of the 10 kids also have 10 kids, that's 100 grandkids for family A.
Couple A are fiends who don't care about sustainabilty, so they decide to have 10 kids.
Coupbe B are advocates of sustainabililty, so they have 2 kids.
Each of Couple A's 10 kids has 10 kids.
Each of Coupble B's 2 kids have 2 kids.
So when the time comes for the grandkids' generations to fight over diminshing resources, which family is going to kill off which family?
Somebody is going to get their asses kicked and my money is on Family A wiping out Family B unles Family B manages to develop advanced killing technologies.
Yeah this is exactly it.
Even if you and your society/group/whatever manage to limit population growth and obtain a rather cushy way of life chances are very good that some other society won't bother being sustainable and then they and their progency will come and beat the living crap out of your society and bring their breeding culture with them as they take over and expand into your territory as they breed outwards.
Re. Mori Mori vs. Maori story again.
It would only work if everyone everywhere agreed to limit population growth and the chances of that happening in my book is nil especially with main religions working against this (plus tougher times usually lead to increased religious fundamentalism).