by MonteQuest » Thu 09 Feb 2006, 02:45:43
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('thuja', 'Y')ou miss the point I think Montequest. Yes of course a little personal conservation ain't gonna stop the inertia ball of population growth, rising Asian demand, etc, but it will create the impetus for people to carve out a different type of life more easily when the shortages and exploding costs begin.
If we can depend less on petroleum through biking, switching to wood heat, gardening. eating more locally, taking mass transit, stopping buying excess "stuff", we will be able to handle the world a tad better down the road.
Oh no, I don't miss the point at all. Switching to conservation is a self-induced recession curtailing economic activity. The purchase of "excess stuff" is somebody's livelyhood. There is no "waste" or "excess" in a capitalistic system that employs people to
sell that waste and excess.
The point that people miss is that we can't continue to do what we do and do it just less so.
It's capitalism or a habitable planet -- you can't have both $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')apitalism is not sustainable by its very nature. It is predicated on infinitely expanding markets, faster consumption and bigger production in a finite planet. And yet this ideological model remains the central organising principle of our lives, and as long as it continues to be so it will automatically undo (with its invisible hand) every single green initiative anybody cares to come up with.