by smallpoxgirl » Tue 31 Jan 2006, 21:55:14
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('PenultimateManStanding', 'W')hat's going on, smallpoxgirl? Any insights as to why our medical system is imploding?
Well...I think it is a natural progression of the paradigm that established modern medicine. Back in the 1800's the robber barrons had so much money they didn't know what to do with it all, so they started the concept of "philanthropy" which essentially boiled down to restructuring society in their image. One of their foremost projects was the consolidation of medical care into the hands of a small number of individuals who would have extensive scientific education and have the right class concious orientation. The basic promise was that science could give you a longer happier life. Well...the problem is that science isn't a static thing. Nobody ever talked about what was a reasonable length for a life. What is a reasonable standard of happiness? So ultimately you end up chasing your tail. Should we spend $20K on a course of Xigris that will improve a patient's survival from an episode of sepsis by 10%? Does it matter if the patient is 90 or 20? Unless you set some rational standards on what is a reasonable length of life and what is a reasonable standard of happiness then things like Xigris and Viagra and 80 year olds getting their 4th heart bypass will consume all the available resources in society.
The paucity of primary care doctors is not an unrelated issue. Medicine is all about the glamourous lie that technology will make you happy and beautiful and give you enternal life. Primary care is a whole different kettle of fish. It is all about trying to understand people, and what their real issues are. It's about listening to people when they tell you about their husbands death and holding their hand. It's not very much about PET scans and the slick new $20K a dose immune modulating drug (that 3 years from now will turn out to cause lymphoma and ear hair and a third hand growing in the middle of your forehead.) American medicine is all about the worship of technology. Small wonder the little technocrats coming out of medical schools don't want to deal with people.
The difficulty and expense of medical training was never established based on the subject matter. The first concept was that doctors needed to have the right class conciousness and higher incomes. Based on that concept the robber barons in conjunction with the AMA lobbied for stricter medical licensing standards, exclusion of non-allopaths from licensure, and longer and longer educational requirements. Don't be tricked into believing that the poor doctors can't afford to go into primary care. The expensive training requirements were established largely at the behest of doctors in order to limit the supply of doctors and justify higher sallaries.