Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Are women responsible for the human condition?

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Are women responsible for the human condition?

Poll ended at Fri 24 Sep 2004, 09:46:01

Yes
8
No votes
No
11
No votes
Not Sure
3
No votes
Other
3
No votes
 
Total votes : 25

Unread postby Aaron » Sun 17 Oct 2004, 10:07:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')his is obviously on the surface a very stupid question, but when you look deeper it is even more stupid.


So you're saying, (in a very rude way), that there is no significant genetic component to disposition...

It's a wash...

But merely saying "Its not men or women, but our shared DNA that is responsible for our actions", is a trite response. Of course it a combination of the parent genes...

The question is do mating choices influence mental disposition?
The problem is, of course, that not only is economics bankrupt, but it has always been nothing more than politics in disguise... economics is a form of brain damage.

Hazel Henderson
User avatar
Aaron
Resting in Peace
 
Posts: 5998
Joined: Thu 15 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Houston

dire!

Unread postby duff_beer_dragon » Sun 17 Oct 2004, 11:58:11

That's so sad I'm not even going to vote.
duff_beer_dragon
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Mon 04 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: the Village

Front butt

Unread postby Cool Hand Linc » Sun 17 Oct 2004, 13:39:35

Have you ever heard of front butt? Look at the picture previously post of the heavy man and you will see front butt.

Watching Dr. Phil, within certain genetic bounderys nice parents do have nice children and mean parents have mean kids.

Realistically, to turn front butt into slim and fine would take liposuction, and several other surguries and steriods. The good thing is he won't need breast implants?

Mankind can nearly do anything? Nearly.........
Peace out!

Cool Hand Linc 8)
User avatar
Cool Hand Linc
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 922
Joined: Sat 17 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tulsa, Ok

Unread postby holmes » Sun 17 Oct 2004, 15:54:32

wow. This is a good one. I would say something went astray with genetic selection. The smartest and strongest dont breed exclusively anymore. I believe cheap energy and empires ruined natural selection. Dummies or genetic weaklings breed alot. Nature has been taken out of the equation. not just the fault of women.
those who have the most energy and cash are at the top now and thoise usually are the most lustfull. IMHO.
What would be ideal is the commpasionate warrior. Most of our native indians were the closest to perfection in this regard of warrior/poet balance.
we messed that up for sure.
im clueless on this one after this.
holmes
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2382
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron