by Tanada » Sun 29 Jan 2006, 19:09:30
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('woodcutter', 'W')e saw On The Beach last night, from Neville Shute's novel of the same name. It was set in Australia after global nuclear war in 1964. Interesting to see an oil-starved urban culture relying on bicycles, electric trains and horse-drawn carriages. In the face of the threat of global warfare focusing on the Iran tensions, the movie seems more relevant than ever. The story contrasts the reactions of various individuals to the inevitability of the future, from complete denial, to panic, to adaptations, resignation and acceptance of death.
Are you seriously claiming that a 42 year old anti-cold-war propaganda peice has any accuracy or relevence to the world we live in today? I hate to break this to you, but looking at anything the people in Hollywood make and thinking it has any bearing on reallity is to be charitible, naive in the extreame.
The job of Hollywood is to entertain, not inform. Never assume that anything they do has any information in it, look up the real scenario's by people who do realistic predictions and you will have a much better chance of figuring out what will really happen in a given set of circumstances. Ont The Beach is a fairly entertaining movie, very well acted and with a gripping dramatic story line, but it has no more reallity in it than The Day After Tommorrow or Jurassic Park!