by jaydenari » Sun 08 Jan 2006, 16:13:28
Hi, all,
I basically agree with you RacerJace -- I'm in the middle, too. I expect SOME of the worst things people have mentioned here will happen, but we also need to remember that in history, other collapses have happened and, after things stabilized, MOST people, for MOST of the time lived peacefully. Those who could adapt (even if they didn't know anything useful to start with) survived; the others didn't.
AmericanEmpire wrote:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')utside the secure wealth zones the law of the time would revert to survival of the fittest. By 2050 survival would not only be a tribal fight for limited resources it would also be survival in the most severe weather humans have ever experienced on planet earth.
I think this statement shows a serious lack of knowledge about what "primitive" survival actually means. Tribal societies are no more warlike than "civilized" ones are, and I suspect the post-collapse groups that become long-term tribes will be the ones that focus more on cooperating to survive than on taking resources from others. That doesn't mean they won't have to occasionally fight to defend themselves, but the key is DEFEND. Although history is full of aggressors, they tend to have a short lifespan. It's the simpler more "parochial" people that have generally survived.
IF things get bad -- even if the worst happens, like nuke war -- I intend to try to survive. With a little luck, I will. That's all anyone CAN do, isn't it?