by donshan » Sat 14 Jan 2006, 02:16:09
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Frank', 'O')ne thing I've noticed is that there's a lot of electric heat still in use, particularly in areas where hydroelectric power is abundant. Given coefficient of performances of ~3 (i.e. 3 times as efficient as electric resistance heating) I would have to wonder if subsidizing homeowners to install these units in lieu of resistance heating wouldn't be a money-maker for utility companies.
The heat pump system I described above WAS installed in a new house under the Bonneville ( mostly hydropower) "Super Good Cents" program which also included an outstanding insulation package inpected and enforced by the utility. However COPs of 3 are not typical. When all the factors are tested in real world conditions the COP of air to air heat pumps are usually is less than the manufactuer's claims with typical values below a COP of 2. It similar to EPA milage on cars- test procedures give good numbers, but in the real world "your mileage may vary".
Some good performance test data is at:
http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/bldg/pubs/hspf/$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')nother contemporary source of empirical data on comparative heat pump performance comes from the Pacific Northwest in sub-metered data taken by the Bonneville Power Administration. As part of its Super Good Cents program, hundreds of homes had space heat sub-metered from 1987 - 1991 with detailed audit information on the homes (Andrews et al, 1989; Eckman, 2000).
Within these data, homes in the populous coastal region of the Pacific Northwest showed an average measured annual space heat of 7,841 kWh (3.63 kWh per square foot of floor area) for those with heat pumps (n= 85) against 8,953 kWh (4.46 kWh per square foot) for those with force air electric strip heat (n= 35). Although the savings produced by heat pumps was statistically significant, the implied coefficient of performance was only 1.23 – well below the nameplate COPs of 1.99 or better.
Although not evaluated here, previous monitoring and evaluation has shown that thermostat setback with morning set-up can have very deleterious effects on air-source heat pump performance as the sudden increase in morning thermostat set-up triggers the use of lower efficiency auxiliary resistance strip heat (Bullock, 1978; Bouchelle et al., 2000). These same set-back strategies do not impact resistance heating systems, and thus reduce the relative efficiency advantage of heat pump systems.