Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Article: from Stirling Newberry of DailyKos

A forum to either submit your own review of a book, video or audio interview, or to post reviews by others.

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby Heineken » Mon 26 Dec 2005, 22:42:43

True, but it doesn't matter, RdSnt. No one person, not even a "good Hitler," could change the course we're on. We can't get from here to there without losing several billion along the way, no matter what we do or don't do.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby MicroHydro » Mon 26 Dec 2005, 23:24:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'I')OW...the more power you have to make changes - wealth, influence, etc. - the least likely you are to want to make changes. You've got it good under the current system. Under a new system, you might find yourself at the bottom. Why would you want to change when you've already won the societal lottery?


Bingo!
"The world is changed... I feel it in the water... I feel it in the earth... I smell it in the air... Much that once was, is lost..." - Galadriel
User avatar
MicroHydro
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun 10 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby JustinFrankl » Tue 27 Dec 2005, 01:47:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('tinosorb', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', 'W')hy would you want to change when you've already won the societal lottery?


Because you have a social conscience? Because you are acutely aware of the consequences of your actions? Because it's the right thing to do? To set a good example? To be a leader and a teacher, not a follower.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary', 'A')void appealing to a man's "better nature". He may not have one. Invoking his self-interest gives you more leverage.


It is of little interest to the rich man that the poor man suffers. The poor are cheap, plentiful, interchangeable, expendable, and largely powerless to affect change. And on a fundamental level, these are all requirements for pyramid building and material wealth generation.

Perpetual growth can occur only at the expense of the planet or of other people in the system.
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby Leanan » Tue 27 Dec 2005, 04:04:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are plenty of people who don't "got it good under the current system," but they aren't demanding change either. I am more interested in that phenomenon. Perhaps they consider their situation merely temporary.


That's Michael Moore's theory. He says Americans think of themselves not as poor, but as "not wealthy yet." Perhaps it's a result of living history only on the upside of the resource curve.

It's gotten harder to get ahead since we hit peak in 1970, but it's only very recently that people have come to doubt whether they will be able to do better than their parents did.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby mark » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 00:04:25

I think we all agree that peak oil is a symptom, but a symptom of what? The ready answer - an unsustainable industrial economy leaves too many unanswered questions; such as, what could we have done differently? Who or where did the mistakes come from? Why have we not seen the problem until it's too late? Confusion reigns until you've identified the real issue behind the symptom.

A symptom of what? Solve that question and you'll understand what we have to do.
mark
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed 01 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: chicago

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby MonteQuest » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 02:01:56

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mark', 'I') think we all agree that peak oil is a symptom, but a symptom of what? The ready answer - an unsustainable industrial economy leaves too many unanswered questions; such as, what could we have done differently? Who or where did the mistakes come from? Why have we not seen the problem until it's too late? Confusion reigns until you've identified the real issue behind the symptom.

A symptom of what? Solve that question and you'll understand what we have to do.


A symptom of exempting man from the laws that govern all other creatures: Limited competition. We wage war. Not only against each other, but against all else that limits our growth.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby peripato » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 03:11:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', 'T')here are plenty of people who don't "got it good under the current system," but they aren't demanding change either. I am more interested in that phenomenon. Perhaps they consider their situation merely temporary. Or perhaps our police state is so well organized and so hermetically sealed that protesters can't ever really gain traction.

Worldwide tolerance of the wealthy by poor and middle class has been sustained up till now by a belief in the virtues of the trickle down effect of economic growth. The poor are told and many believe that if you work hard and mind to your business then the future will be brighter for them and their children. This story is maintained as a cultural value because it is supported by myth and propoganda and has been true for many.

However when economic growth begins to decay and does not offer the possiblity of progress any longer then this tolerance of the rich by the rest will erode. New social and political movements will arise worldwide as a result, demanding a redistribution of wealth. Whether the wealthy will tolerate this push to strip them of their riches without a backlash of their own remains to be seen.
User avatar
peripato
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1335
Joined: Tue 03 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Reality
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby seldom_seen » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 03:35:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('mark', 'I') think we all agree that peak oil is a symptom, but a symptom of what?

A symptom of a civilization that does not have any regard for limits. In fact, a civilization that holds contempt for the idea of limits. Those who try to remind people of this fact are often labelled as "malthusians," or "luddites" or "doomers," or some crazy people from the fringe who are trying to rain on the parade of our limitless fiesta!

I pay pretty close attention to marketing in print/radio/tv, you would be amazed how many times we are promised a "world with no limits" by the marketers. That message is subliminally drilled in to our brains from an early age. This is pathalogical, or diseased thinking. Peak oil is not the problem. All peak oil does is expose the disease in broad daylight for everyone to see.

Here's an example of how twisted this problem is. We currently are in a situation where we should be massively conserving the remains of our endowment of oil, such that it can be spread out as far in to the future as possible while we figure this whole thing out. However, if we enter a massive conservation effort it would require that less oil comes to market, which translates to less work and a slowing or stalled economy. So instead, we've decided to gun it for the cliff.

The economic effects of peak oil occur whether we plan for it or not. When you're on top of the peak you can either climb off or slide off, but you still have to go back down the other side. I would much rather climb off, but it doesn't seem to be shaping up that way at this point.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby DesertBear2 » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 04:22:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Heineken', '
')
There are plenty of people who don't "got it good under the current system," but they aren't demanding change either. I am more interested in that phenomenon. Perhaps they consider their situation merely temporary. Or perhaps our police state is so well organized and so hermetically sealed that protesters can't ever really gain traction.


People either don't get it...or are not demanding change because-

1. They are busy busy busy with increasing work demands. And most Americans identity and meaning of life is tied in with income and job title. The salary is not going real far anymore in terms of real estate prices and the costs of almost any professional service.

2. Time off from work is often spent in mindless decompression from work pressures. And is usually spent in a zoned out state in front of the TV. Or in a zoned out state of shopping-mania. And even leisure time is busy busy busy.

3. Religion provides a fake concocted "deeper meaning" that is disconnected from the true realities of the individuals economic situation and powerless status in the society. American's favorite drug.....

4. The great myths of America soldier on and on......the Horatio Alger myth suggests that the US economic system is so fair that anybody who works hard can rise to the top economically and socially. There are enough success stories in America to keep this sacred principal strong and vital...even in those who will never have the knowledge or contacts to ever ever become wealthy. So work hard, don't complain, and don't question the basic fairness of the American way if you want to get rich and powerful in the US.

And then there is the myth of the "Great Western" drama where tough hardworking individualists battle elements and Indians to establish a new life in a broad great land....with unlimited resources of course. There are no permanent bad endings under the broad western sky...and plenty of open country if you need to pull up stakes and move on.

5. And then there is the hatred of intellectuals among the American people. Anybody who comes up with any kind of theory about anything is usually viewed as a disconnected dreamer. Not one of the real "hardworking folks" who keep America rolling....
DesertBear2
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby Heineken » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 10:37:36

Absolutely, desertbear2. That's a superbly worded "filling in the blanks" of what I wrote. Funny, just the other day I thought of "busy-ness" as being a big reason for the inertia, and magically that factor appeared in your post! People are all wrapped up in their little, on-the-go lives and don't have time for effecting major change or even for thinking about it.

Yet another factor is the psychology of previous investment. People are literally invested in their lifestyles and would be loathe to lose money by radically retooling. Even if not retooling means losing everything later on.

And yet, revolutions have happened throughout recent human history. I guess a certain critical mass has to be achieved first; revolutions are almost by definition reactive rather than proactive. The only way a revolution will work to avoid the converging disasters we face is if it is proactive rather than reactive. Very unlikely, given human nature.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby dukey » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 10:49:56

"the only real option is radical transformation"

agreed
we need to completely restructure and re-organise the economy
It has to happen right now, and it needs a a guiding hand to make it happen (the government) otherwise it will only happen through the destruction of the economy, like never felt before
User avatar
dukey
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2248
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby Aqua » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 12:21:33

I second that but no prizes for guessing which option will prevail. Look what happened to Jimmy Carter the last time someone with power and influence tried to make radical transformations to the status quo. If anything things have gotten worse since then, to ask the general public for sacrifice and hardship is political suicide and every politician in the western world knows it.
Change will come but it sure as hell won’t be voluntary in nature.
User avatar
Aqua
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Wed 23 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 12:58:28

Hmmm. It's not just Mr. Newberry. The whole financial world is now taking peak oil more seriously.

Oil Analysts, Wrong Since 2001, End Forecasts of Price Drop

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')Bad Calls

Oil analysts got it wrong this year, predicting that prices would average $40.33 in 2005 [actual was $56.67]. Wall Street had forecast that oil would be $26.81 during 2004, the December 2003 survey showed. Instead, crude in New York averaged $41.40 in 2004.

"The dynamic shifted this year,'' said Doug Leggate, senior oil analyst at Citigroup Inc. in New York. "There was a growing perception that supply was running out. The doomsday scenario that stated OPEC couldn't meet demand and the Saudis wouldn't be able to increase output gained traction.''

Matthew Simmons, chairman of Houston-based energy investment bank Simmons & Co., wrote in Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy' that about 90 percent of Saudi Arabia's oil output comes from seven fields, including three that have pumped for more than 50 years. Some fields are expected to rapidly decline with few replacement sources, he said.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. analyst Arjun Murti in New York, who roiled oil markets in March by saying crude may reach $105 a barrel, said in a report on Dec. 12 that his forecast may be conservative if the "peak oil'' theory is right. He forecasts oil of $50 to $105 a barrel until 2009.


I suspect this is why Newberry is not as dismissive of peak oil as he used to be. Peak oil has become almost mainstream. We're so doomerish here that we tend to overlook this sea change. A year ago, they were still predicting oil was going to go back down any day now. No longer.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&

Unread postby JohnnyReb » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 20:50:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Leanan', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here are plenty of people who don't "got it good under the current system," but they aren't demanding change either. I am more interested in that phenomenon. Perhaps they consider their situation merely temporary.


That's Michael Moore's theory. He says Americans think of themselves not as poor, but as "not wealthy yet." Perhaps it's a result of living history only on the upside of the resource curve.

It's gotten harder to get ahead since we hit peak in 1970, but it's only very recently that people have come to doubt whether they will be able to do better than their parents did.


As a person who subsisted on government hand outs of #10 cans of peanut butter, boiled pork in green cans and 50 pound bags of rice when I was a child in the 50s and 60s, I climbed out of that trap and make a very comfortable income now. Is it possible on a large scale? I dont know, but I do personally know quite a few people who went from poverty to middle and upper middle class since 1970. Not a huge number, but suprisingly quite a few. I made it serving in the military for over 24 years and using the skills I had acquired in the service after I retired.

I feel peak oil is a real issue, but I dont have a clue when it is going to happen, too many predictions have come to pass as incorrect and I have seen way too many "revised" predictions to give credence to any person or group on when peak oil will happen, and the results of what will happen after peak. I also dont know if there is a "cliff" or a gradual slope that may give us a soft landing. But I do know that I and lots of others have come out of poverty since the US peak. To say that it is harder to get "ahead" on any large scale since the US peak isnt true in my opinion. And yes I know, I am just one person, but I am one person who has done it and seen quite a few other people who have done it also. I also dont think I am the exception, anyone who is that situation would do everything in their power to get out of it, if they have any motivation to do so. Motivation might be the key word here.
User avatar
JohnnyReb
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed 28 Dec 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: "the only real option is radical transformation&quo

Unread postby Leanan » Wed 28 Dec 2005, 23:46:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.') To say that it is harder to get "ahead" on any large scale since the US peak isnt true in my opinion.


I think it's true. Doesn't mean it's impossible to get ahead, mind. For one thing, we used our cheap oil to build a military industrial complex that allows us to extract the rest of the world's resources. That's the whole point of globalization; it allows us to take other countries' resources, like a greedy kid who has gulped down his desert and starts eating everyone else's.

The people who first noticed that it was harder to get ahead were the people who worked blue-collar manufacturing jobs. This was a huge issue in the '70s and early '80s. Billy Joel even wrote a hit song about it: "Allentown."

Every child had a pretty good shot
To get at least as far as their old man got
But something happened on the way to that place
They threw an American flag in our face


Many northeastern cities have still not recovered from this. The small city I attended college in used to have a paper plant where you could earn $20/hour even if you didn't graduate from high school, let alone college. The plant closed in the early '80s, and now the only way to make that kind of money is drug-dealing.

I think it's catching up to white collar workers now. Many of them are still doing okay, but can kids these days still expect to do better than their parents? No, I don't think so. I think many will struggle to achieve the standard of living their parents have.

When you think about it...is it reasonable to expect each generation to be better off than the one before? Is possible? In a finite world, the answer is obviously no...but that's been our reality, until very recently.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Previous

Return to Book/Media Reviews

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests