by smiley » Wed 21 Dec 2005, 20:00:06
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he problem with engineers is that they are completely clueless and have to be babysitted to get them to do any valuable work.
Speaking as an engineer strongly I disagree. The thing is that we don't live in the garage days of science anymore. In order to do science you need money and lots of it.
In order to keep working I need to attract about $180.000 a year in funding. That is to pay my salary, my materials, equipment and the tons of bureaucracy that is supposed to support me.
So I have to go shopping for funding. And of course I look for the places where I get the most funding with the least questions asked. So now I am dividing my time between defense projects and consumer electronics.
We do what society pays us to do. So it is up to society to decide what they want.
If they think that innovative energy solutions are the key to the future and are willing to pay for it, fine, I'll start tomorrow. If they think that it is of utter importance to have a zoom lens on their mobile phone, that's equally fine to me. We'll provide them with a nice lens to capture the decline.
But blame society for making the wrong choices in priorities, not the engineers.