by Wrencher » Sun 29 Jan 2006, 17:52:17
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kochevnik', ':')The evidence is right here in front of your nose in this thread and the other MBTI threads. 'Normal' people don't get it because they CAN'T. They (with some exceptions) are incapable of understanding PO.
I would submit that the Sensing Judges (SJs) won't see PO because they are very traditional in their outlook, generally, and show support for 'official' sources of information - such as the USGS. SJ's are some35-40% of the population. They believe too strongly in the institutions, company's and countrys that are spining the data. Very big blind spot.
Sensing Percievers are action people and not given to analysis much at all. But they might well be the ones that you might want to befriend. Their knowledge of tools and building and great adaptability will make them valuable in a PO world. SPs make up about another 35% of the population.
So that leaves NFs and NTs . A distinct minority to begin with. Personally, I think there are many different types of intellegence, and that we will need them all before we are done'
Very interesting statiistics on the likelyhood of having a high IQ by type. I'm no expert on tests and testing but do feel that sometimes results of a test are skewed by the test designer. There really are no tests where you have a pile of yarn and have to make a sweater in three hours, or replace an alternator, or hang a door etc. Or get a messed up box of invoices and have to come up with a good filing system etc. Or diffuse a complex and heated arguement, bringing both sides as close to the middle as possible. These are talents that we don't measure but that are very important in life - other kinds of intellience.
As much as I would like to think that good analysis is the most desirable trait, I have to look at my life are admit that while I am pretty good at it (INTP) it really hasn't made me a very effective person.