by PenultimateManStanding » Sat 17 Dec 2005, 09:33:09
National Review and Peter Jackson's King Kong, in which is discussed the history of Kong movies going back to 1932. (There is even a discussion of the comic book spin-offs). Here the reviewer writes about the 70s version:
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')If there was a touch of Teddy Roosevelt about the attitudes underpinning the first King Kong, so the movie that marked the franchise’s return to America in 1976 mirrored a suspicion of big business that was, along with an environmentalist subtext, hints of corruption in the White House, and refreshing honesty about the real nature of Kong’s interest in his latest blonde, very characteristic of its time. In the same way, the blonde, played by a Jessica Lange hot enough to bring Godzilla to his knees, was, in contrast to the passive Ann Darrow, an emancipated woman of the ERA era perfectly capable of telling her simian seducer what for. Hear her roar, monkey boy. More than that, the erotic attraction went both ways. Kong’s earlier sweethearts may have felt sorry for the big lunk, but that was it; with Dwan, there was, in the end, something…else. And if you think I’m wrong, just check out the look on her face when Kong, ahem, dries her off.
Definately, Jessica Lange was
hot. The funniest scene in that 70s version (a Dino DeLaurentis flick) was when the 'natives' were closing the massive gate to keep Kong out. There was this huge dark log, all greased up, which had to be pushed into this sheath-like thingy to secure to door. Now, as I said, the new one is proper and chaste. Kong falls for the beautiful girl and pays the price. Special effects are amazing. Jack Black is funny. But so far, audiences aren't buying it.
National' Review's King Kong review:
http://www.nationalreview.com/stuttafor ... 160834.asp