Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Past the Peak, I think

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 20:58:56

i have envisioned a terror strike in SA also. This would devastate the worlds economy. I also believe we are either at peak or past peak. 84-85 mbpd is going to be it. Next summers driving and hurricane season will be the measuring stick to see if production keeps up. ( i know that isnt what po is, but if 85 mbpd is the production peak, we will pass that next year )
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Ludi » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 21:19:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('grabby', 'O')k,,so now they are releasing reserves, tell me, what is the emergency?
It sure got the prez pumpin, didn't it?


Shopping season.

I'm not kidding.
Ludi
 

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 21:57:38

I think we hit a plateau a short ways back with small fluctuations in production and steadily increasing prices over the course of each year. When the big dropoff in production comes, watch out.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Armageddon » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 22:16:35

when countries start using their spr, it clouds what the actual numbers really are.
User avatar
Armageddon
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7450
Joined: Wed 13 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: St.Louis, Mo

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 23:31:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', 'A')ctual recovery of the 5.4 trillion barrels will be about 22% at current technology levels = 1.188 trillion barrels of oil. Right there you have your 15-20 year supply of oil.
You hope. Wouldn't there be a peak on heavy crude, also? If so, the supply will last a lot longer, but not at the rate our growth-centred societies need it.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have said it before and I will say it again. THERE IS NOT ONE PEAK OIL "EXPERT" THAT HAS THIS DATA.
And yet you post, with absolute confidence, figures that you know are incorrect (unless you are not a peak oil expert and have somehow stumbled on the accurate data). If we're at peak now, with conventional, why do you assume that unconventional will fill the increasing gap for a decade or two more?
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby TonyPrep » Sun 11 Dec 2005, 23:34:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('DigitalCubano', 'A')t the risk of drawing the ire of everyone, I am becoming more convinced that peak is something on the order of at least a decade away. I still think it's an important issue, but am becoming increasingly skeptical that it's an impending crisis.
And just what is it that convinces you, that has eluded many others? Do you think there is a chance you might be wrong?

Tony
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Flow » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 02:11:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('TonyPrep', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', 'A')ctual recovery of the 5.4 trillion barrels will be about 22% at current technology levels = 1.188 trillion barrels of oil. Right there you have your 15-20 year supply of oil.
You hope. Wouldn't there be a peak on heavy crude, also? If so, the supply will last a lot longer, but not at the rate our growth-centred societies need it.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') have said it before and I will say it again. THERE IS NOT ONE PEAK OIL "EXPERT" THAT HAS THIS DATA.
And yet you post, with absolute confidence, figures that you know are incorrect (unless you are not a peak oil expert and have somehow stumbled on the accurate data). If we're at peak now, with conventional, why do you assume that unconventional will fill the increasing gap for a decade or two more?


a) Of course Unconventional Oil will peak also. But much like conventional oil, I think the 22% extraction rate of unconventional oil will grow as technology grows. Look what has happened to conventional oil. Twenty years ago, we could only hope to get about 22% of the conventional oil out of a well. Today we are at or around 35% and with CO2 injections that number could grow to as much as 60% (but more than likely closer to 50%). Right there alone (35% to 50% = 15% increase in reserves) you have another 548 billion barrels of oil on top of the 1.278 trillion barrels of conventional oil proven reserves. Also, please do not forget that the decline will be gradual and will not happen overnight so it is not like we need to fill our entire need overnight.

b) I do not assume that unconventional will fill the gas if we are at peak right now. If we are at Peak Oil right now, we are screwed - no doubt about it. However, I do not believe the world will hit peak oil until 2020 or later which gives us at least 15 years to get our "unconventional" act together so to speak.

c) I feel there is a lot of more "Peak Oil" awareness in politics today than there has ever been. I see politicians on both sides of the fence getting on the "we need to reduce oil imports from terrorist supporting nations ASAP" bandwagon (whether they believe in Peak Oil or not). There is a bill being tossed around congress as we speak that has the goal of greatly reducing (or eliminate) the oil imports by 2015 by increasing tax credits for electric-hybrids car purchases, producing oil from coal, waste, and increased BioFuels production, etc. Also, I have to go with what the real experts say (USGS and EIA) who say peak oil will not happen for 20-30 years. The so-called "Peak Oil" experts are nothing of the sort.

d) I see Peak Oil mentioned in print all over the place in mainstream print media (though not as much on the TV media). I think awareness is being raised. More and more people will hear about this and people will start taking notice = more and more polititians will take notice. I think Katrina taking gas well over $3 a gallon helped this political process get underway too. Gave us a little taste of what we can expect and kind of gave the right people a wake up call. Even if the polititians choose to believe the 2037 data given by the USGS/EIA they have to realize it is coming sooner or later. Based on this and the current "Energy Crisis" I think the political ball will get rolling sooner rather than later.

e) I see nuclear taking over for producing our electrical demand in the future. It already provides around 20% of our electrical needs with around 100 nuclear plants across the country. We build 400 more plants and we are a nuclear society (minus any energy we can get from Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Tidal, etc).

f) Our coal supply will be turned into oil (around 600 billion barrels worth in the USA alone). During the 50-75 years that it takes to burn through our coal supply, I see hyrdogen or electric vehicles taking over (hydrogen being produced by the nuclear plants and/or nanotechnologies greatly improving the life a car battery that can power the entire car).

g) BioFuels, TCP, Wind, Solar, Tidal, Geothermal, etc. will become more and more common place but not as much as nuclear will.

Do I have all the numbers? Nope. But I have read the EIA website backward and forward (in additon to thousands of other related articles/reports) and find no reason to believe that Peak Oil has happened and will not happen for a long time. During that time, more and more unconventional oil will come online as it is now economically feasible to produce oil from these sources with oil probably never dropping below $50 a barrel again. This rise in unconventional oil production will ultimately have the effect of reducing our demand on conventional oil which will extend conventional peak that much further into the future. I also see vehicles in the USA becoming more and more fuel effiecent which will reduce our demand even more = another delay for peak oil.
User avatar
Flow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby TonyPrep » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 02:34:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', 'I') have read the EIA website backward and forward
Flow,

You seem to think EIA/USGS are the experts. How have their predictions been in the past? I understand they expected, in their 2001 predictions, that a number of countries would increase their production but some were already in decline at that point and some reached peak following the predictions. If that's true, it would just go to show that you can't believe any figures.

I sincerely hope you're wrong, though, because we'll end up even more screwed than we are. Another 50 years of economic growth and using every last bit of fossil fuels or uranium that we can get our hands on would be an unmitigated disaster.

Tony
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 03:26:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', ' ') I see nuclear taking over for producing our electrical demand in the future. It already provides around 20% of our electrical needs with around 100 nuclear plants across the country. We build 400 more plants and we are a nuclear society (minus any energy we can get from Solar, Wind, Geothermal, Tidal, etc).


"You" see that happening, but the reality says otherwise. We are building 100 new coal-fired plants here in the US and have plans for 3 nukes.

"If" a frog had wings , he wouldn't bump his ass.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby MonteQuest » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 03:38:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', ' '). But much like conventional oil, I think the 22% extraction rate of unconventional oil will grow as technology grows. Look what has happened to conventional oil. Twenty years ago, we could only hope to get about 22% of the conventional oil out of a well. Today we are at or around 35% and with CO2 injections that number could grow to as much as 60% (but more than likely closer to 50%). Right there alone (35% to 50% = 15% increase in reserves) you have another 548 billion barrels of oil on top of the 1.278 trillion barrels of conventional oil proven reserves. Also, please do not forget that the decline will be gradual and will not happen overnight so it is not like we need to fill our entire need overnight.


You fail to consider the fact that the 22% extraction rate will be for a product with a lower EROEI. Tar sands has an EROEI of 1.5 to 2.1 versus 30 to 1 for conventional oil. Not much room for diminishing returns before the EROEI< 1. Oil went from 100 to 1 to 30 to 1.

Do the math.

And what will the rate of this extraction be? Match conventional oil? Never happen.

You also fail to consider the cost at retail. Will unconventional oil be as cheap or cheaper than conventional oil? It had better be, or you are going to see the economy tank. Peak oil is about the end of cheap, readily available liquid fuel. We are designed around that arrangement not ever changing.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Flow » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 13:31:28

Here is what my last line of my post was going to be before I decided to remove it. I saved it:

"My prediction is that very soon after this post somebody will want to justify that this wil not be feasible based on EROEI."

Then I realized that if I posted that, it may not come true so I held back.

So I will say this again - EROEI is a Peak Oil doomer scam. You kind of pointed that out Monte when you wrote "Oil went from 100 to 1 to 30 to 1." If it really mattered, should production not have dropped significatly with EROEI (on the scale of a 70% reduction)? In reality, it is completely the opposite. Also, you forgot to mention that oil from new discoveries has an EROEI of 10:1 but that would lessen the affect of your argument I guess. Yet we still produce that oil and we are still looking for more.

Ask yourself, why is EROEI so low for Tar Sands? Because it takes a lot of (way cheaper) NATURAL GAS and ELECTRICITY to produce oil from it. What does that added "energy" do to EROEI? It lowers it. What is the Fossil Fuel return on Fossile Fuel Invested ratio because honestly, that is all that matters.

Same thing holds true for Ethanol. It takes around 49700 BTUs To produce a gallon Ethanol from corn. Of that 49700 BTUs, 54.4% (27,070 BTUs) of the energy comes from Fertilizers used to grow the corn. Only 34.6% (17,222 BTUs) of the energy comes from actual "Energy" with the following breakdown: Diesel=7491 BTU, Gasoline=3519 BTU, LPG=2108 BTU, Electricty=2258 BTU, and Natural Gas=1846 BTU. To futher break this down into FFROFFI, it takes 11,010 BTU's of the 49700 BTUs total BTUs to produce Ethanal or about 22%. A gallon of Ethanal has around 76,000 BTUs of energy. So the FFOFFI for ethanal is 6.9 to 1. By way of the comparision, the FFOFFI ratio during the entire production of gasoline is .79 to 1. That's right a negative return but we still produce it.

What will the production of unconventional oil be? No clue and neither do you so I guess your opinion on it depends if you are a "glass if half empty or glass if half full" type of person. Also, it does not have to equal the production of conventional oil - it just has to pick up the slack once peak oil happens and conventional oil goes into decline.

And I have never left out the cost of production. When a barrel of oil from coal can be produced for a profit at around $35 a barrel and tar sands about the same and I see that a barrel of oil is selling for around $60 a barrel, it doesn't take a math major to figure out which one will save us money.

p.s. Here is the source of my numbers for Ethanol in case you were wondering:

http://www.bioproducts-bioenergy.gov/pd ... alance.pdf
User avatar
Flow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Flow » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 13:42:38

One thing that I forgot to add is once Peak Oil happens and unconventional oil is forced to pick up the slack, I think this will be an even larger wake up call to the world and especially the USA. This will prompt us to get our act together more than ever so that we will never be completely dependant on unconventional oil for our energy needs.

If it takes 20 years to get off our dependance on fossil fuel, we will have it once peak happens for just this reason.
User avatar
Flow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 20:02:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')If" a frog had wings , he wouldn't bump his ass.


Time to get Froggy a set of wings then.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Falconoffury » Mon 12 Dec 2005, 23:22:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')o I have all the numbers? Nope.


If you freely admit that you don't have sufficient empirical data, then why do you hold so tightly to the soft landing? There comes a time where you simply have to accept reality.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')ne thing that I forgot to add is once Peak Oil happens and unconventional oil is forced to pick up the slack, I think this will be an even larger wake up call to the world and especially the USA. This will prompt us to get our act together more than ever so that we will never be completely dependant on unconventional oil for our energy needs.


You have to admit, your optimism is stretching the most likely scenario. You make it sound as if we are some wise, enlightened species that will all work together and help one another. Don't you know anything about history? If we were so wise, we probably wouldn't have gotten into the peak oil mess in the first place. We wouldn't have grown to 6.5 billion people, or gone through all those terrible wars. Read about several events such as the Rwandan genocide, the Argentinan currency crash of 2002, or the holocaust. The human race is still barbaric. Fossil fuel has only made the world seem happy and friendly for a brief time in history.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Flow » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 01:11:57

I never said we would work together (as a world that is). I said the USA can make it work. Some countries will not be as fortunate.
User avatar
Flow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Flow » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 02:21:33

I have been taking the time to read through the Michael Lynch - Disputing Peak Oil thread. I am on page 18 of 48 (date Aug 28, 2005) and I find a lot what I am trying to say in this thread.

The difference is Lynch doesn't get flamed by every doomer out there when he posts something. If you haven't read the thread, I would suggest doing so as there is a lot of great information being presented there.
User avatar
Flow
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat 05 Nov 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby Falconoffury » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 11:09:13

The USA is going to try to make things work in the future in the same manner that they handled Iraq. They are going to make the rest of the world a worse place in order to make the USA a better place. The USA is a bully country.

The only thing that makes people nicer to each other in the USA is because more people have guns. When things get really bad, people will turn those guns on each other. Read about the various shootings in New Orleans. The USA is not immune to the destructive human nature. The strong individualism among people makes the USA a strong candidate for a violent outcome to the depletion of fossil fuels. You have too much faith in people.
"If humans don't control their numbers, nature will." -Pimentel
"There is not enough trash to go around for everyone," said Banrel, one of the participants in the cattle massacre.
"Bush, Bush, listen well: Two shoes on your head," the protesters chant
User avatar
Falconoffury
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1395
Joined: Tue 25 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby TorrKing » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 11:30:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Falconoffury', 'T')he USA is going to try to make things work in the future in the same manner that they handled Iraq. They are going to make the rest of the world a worse place in order to make the USA a better place. The USA is a bully country.

The only thing that makes people nicer to each other in the USA is because more people have guns. When things get really bad, people will turn those guns on each other. Read about the various shootings in New Orleans. The USA is not immune to the destructive human nature. The strong individualism among people makes the USA a strong candidate for a violent outcome to the depletion of fossil fuels. You have too much faith in people.


Exactly what I think too. Individualism, a strong focus on competition, oppurtunism, religion and great social problems will bring the US down when cheap oil runs out.

There is a reason why Americans in general doesn't know anything of other countries. They have to make a distance from themselves and others to be able to feel as a common unit. That is what the American educational system, politics and pateriotism is all about.

God bless America!!! :razz: :lol:

Torjus Gaaren
User avatar
TorrKing
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu 24 Nov 2005, 04:00:00
Location: The ever shrinking wilds of Norway
Top

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby gnm » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 12:04:08

Actually I know a great deal about other countries and I have traveled quite a bit as well. I will take individualism over collectivism any day. Of course we may have problems and violence here. In communist and socialist countries it will be much easier - the government will just inform you that your cheese ration will be cut in half effective immediately. Or maybe they'll just decide that 50% of you need to die for the "good of the nation".

-G
gnm
 

Re: Past the Peak, I think

Unread postby TonyPrep » Tue 13 Dec 2005, 15:21:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Flow', 'H')ere is what my last line of my post was going to be before I decided to remove it. I saved it:

"My prediction is that very soon after this post somebody will want to justify that this wil not be feasible based on EROEI."
My prediction is that most people looking into this will extract the figures that appear to support their case. You're now even suggesting that gasoline is a net energy loser, whilst ethanol is almost twice as beneficial in terms of, what you choose to call FFRoFFI.

However, you seem to completely miss the real point of peak oil. Our society is overshooting all sorts of resources (aquifers, minerals, topsoil, arable land, fossil fuels, habitats, ...) and will even overshoot renewables if it continues to grow remorselessly. Your absolute faith, and desire, that society will somehow continue this rollercoaster to oblivion, scares the shit out of me.

Fortunately, whatever you choose to believe in, it seems that society, as a whole, doesn't care about alternatives and will continue to focus solely on those resources that will deplete most rapidly, thus making some kind of transition to an energy source, that you believe will save us, very unlikely in time.

Tony
User avatar
TonyPrep
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2842
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Waiuku, New Zealand
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron