Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Native Americans Thread (merged)

A forum for discussion of regional topics including oil depletion but also government, society, and the future.

Would the Native Americans have screwed up as royally?

Yes
16
No votes
No
18
No votes
America wasn't screwed up
4
No votes
 
Total votes : 38

THE Native Americans Thread (merged)

Postby PEK » Wed 13 Oct 2004, 12:53:39

Dear Friends, Society will not collapse but the rentier/financier commercial systems will Thank God!

One alternative tried and true will be around for those of us who choose to keep on keeping on. Villages such as these will become the backbone of the communities after the "fall."

Not only will they produce, jewelery from their mines and silver "currency" with lasers, but other basic needs such as soap, clothing, cooking untensils, corn, crops and the like. It´s all pretty simple and clear, a return to the basics

Please see how your vision relates to this and other communities based upon this model:

Tecalpulco, Guerrero, Mexico :) http://www.artcamp.com.mx/healing/indian.htm

Indigenous Indian Collectives of America http://wc4.worldcrossing.com/webx?14@16 ... @.1ddefd17
User avatar
PEK
 
Joined: Wed 13 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Discussion: genocide of American Indians

Postby johnmarkos » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 16:37:12

BabyPeanut posted this article, which asserts that, "Spain and Britain slaughtered 120 million of my ancestors before Hitler ever hit the scene." The article below explores the complex question of whether indigenous Americans were the victims of genocide.

http://hnn.us/articles/7302.html

Regardless of what one calls the tragedy of contact between Europeans and the indigenous peoples of the Americas, it is instructive to learn more detail about this history.
Last edited by johnmarkos on Thu 03 Mar 2005, 14:48:46, edited 4 times in total.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Postby oowolf » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 16:45:06

The numbers are morally irrelevant.
I wonder if the Germans have an "American Holocaust" museum"?
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide?

Postby eric_b » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 17:36:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', 'B')abyPeanut posted this article, which asserts that, "Spain and Britain slaughtered 120 million of my ancestors before Hitler ever hit the scene." The article below explores the complex question of whether indigenous Americans were the victims of genocide.

http://hnn.us/articles/7302.html

Regardless of what one calls the tragedy of contact between Europeans and the indigenous peoples of the Americas, it is instructive to learn more detail about this history.


No shit they were the victims of genocide, if only indirectly at times.

There are some estimates the initial Indian population in NA was
higher than commonly estimated. The diseases spread by the white
man (purposely or not -- like smallpox) decimated many Indian
socities.

Then, after helping the white man get established in the New World,
we repayed the Indians by killing them and taking their land. Renegging
on most major treaties we signed with them. Indians were horribly
discriminated against. Remember the trail of tears? Huge Indian
tribes uprooted and forced to move to inhospitible area like the Dakotas.

It's one very sad chapter in American history seldom heard about
anymore.

-Eric B
User avatar
eric_b
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1174
Joined: Fri 14 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: us

Re: Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide?

Postby johnmarkos » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 17:44:48

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('eric_b', '
')It's one very sad chapter in American history seldom heard about
anymore.


Agreed, and we should never forget it.

John
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Postby mgibbons19 » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 18:31:14

I didn't think it was ever in question. I love my country but:

1) massacre, money for heads, smollpoox blankies
2) destroying resources (buffalo)
3) forced assimilation of the children (50s boarding schools)
4) suppression/usurpation of culture (how do you like that dreamcatcher rearview mirror air freshener?)

all qualifies as genocide. I think this is the UN's definition.

The only one missing is 5) mass rape.
mgibbons19
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1105
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby lotrfan55345 » Tue 01 Mar 2005, 18:47:34

... and wtf is with all the western movies portraying Indians as "savage BEASTS"
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Postby The_Virginian » Thu 03 Mar 2005, 14:29:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.') and wtf is with all the western movies portraying Indians as "savage BEASTS


Uhh, cause they dared to fight. Plus they did not have much in the way of literature or scientific priciples.


It was a clash of a "Bronze"/stone age culture against a rapidly industrializing one.

No contest.

While I doubt there were 120 million Natives in the Northern half of the Americas, it was still a lot more than exist today.

Yes it was genocide, ethnic cleansing etc.
[urlhttp://www.youtube.com/watchv=Ai4te4daLZs&feature=related[/url] "My soul longs for the candle and the spices. If only you would pour me a cup of wine for Havdalah...My heart yearning, I shall lift up my eyes to g-d, who provides for my needs day and night."
User avatar
The_Virginian
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1684
Joined: Sat 19 Jun 2004, 03:00:00

Postby johnmarkos » Thu 03 Mar 2005, 14:58:33

Here's an article by Ward Churchill, "An American Holocaust?
The Structure of Denial."

http://www.sdonline.org/33/ward_churchill.htm

I plan to read David Stannard's book, American Holocaust, as soon as I can get it from the library.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Postby Ayoob_Reloaded » Thu 03 Mar 2005, 15:01:23

Hey, we're nice guys. We wouldn't do anything like this.
User avatar
Ayoob_Reloaded
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 355
Joined: Tue 07 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

THE Native Americans Thread (merged)

Postby BabyPeanut » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 09:05:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/news/state/051103lngsuit.shtml]Passamaquoddy groups sue officials over LNG project (link)[/url]
Associated Press
Thursday, November 3, 2005

BANGOR — Two groups from the Passamaquoddy Tribe on Wednesday sued officials of the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs, saying the BIA failed to represent their views in its review of a proposed liquefied natural gas terminal in eastern Maine. A lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court by a group called We Protect Our Homeland, an affiliate of Save Passamaquoddy Bay Three-Nation Alliance, and six members of the Pleasant Point Passamaquoddy community.

...skip...

The suit claims the BIA failed to conduct an environmental assessment on the impacts of siting a major industrial facility at Split Rock, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act, and violated the National Historic Preservation Act by failing to consider the historic significance of the Split Rock site.

It also says the BIA failed to consider the impact of the lease on the Pleasant Point community, in violation of federal requirements, and failed to ensure that the tribe receives fair market value for the leased lands.

...snip...

So is that prounounced PASS-AHH-MAH-KWADDY?
:)
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: Native Tribe In Maine Sues over LNG Terminal

Postby Revi » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 10:57:14

We need the LNG, but do they need to site it in a place that could lead to wiping out a whole culture? Couldn't we put it where it wouldn't wipe out the Passamaquoddys? We need it in Maine to replace the Sable Island gas that is in steep decline now. They are already talking about rolling blackouts for the coldest part of the winter, due to shortage of nat gas to fire the Southern Maine power plants. If we don't get LNG in Maine, Irving will do itin New Brunswick and sell it to us anyway.
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Re: Native Tribe In Maine Sues over LNG Terminal

Postby peakme » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 11:11:16

yup, with emphasis on the PASS and the QUOD.

this is a really tough issue as revi points out. however, if the process was ambushed as suggested by the tribe (what? the govt bypassed due process? huh?), then i can sympathize. i know lots of people won't agree with me, but a little bit of rolling blackout action around here isn't the end of the world. it would get people to wake the f#ck up. and, i would argue, minimizing consumption is far preferable to just jacking up supply inexorably [which will, of course, cease to be an option at some point].
User avatar
peakme
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue 18 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine, USA

Re: Native Tribe In Maine Sues over LNG Terminal

Postby Leanan » Thu 03 Nov 2005, 11:41:26

Sixty or seventy years ago, there was a government proposal to build a tidal power plant in Passamaquoddy Bay. (Tides are stronger the further away from the equator you are, and in narrow bodies of water such as the Bay of Fundy.)

I believe it was one of those government programs meant to give people jobs during the Great Depression by putting them to work on public works. They never went through with it, though, because it was ruled too expensive.

Might be something to reconsider...
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Native Tribe In Maine Sues over LNG Terminal

Postby Synergist » Sun 06 Nov 2005, 04:25:58

I don't know much about Maine but I do know Eureka, Ca. It is absolutely criminal to propose an LNG harbor in that tiny, remote rural community. It is just more exploitation of the rural poor by the rich urban elites in San Francisco, Sacramento, and above all Los Angeles.

If the people in LA cannot be torn away from their SUVs and their highways then build the explosive LNG terminals right in Santa Monica. Southern California liberals are the biggest hypocrites in the world. They want to drive everywhere, but they want to legislate all the hidden horror out of sight, out of mind.

Californians demand special blends of gasoline that nobody else in the country uses. The precious few refineries in California can barely meet demand. But God forbid anyone build a new refinery, and of course the California government and its host of political interest groups attack and penalize the energy producers.

Yet the California economy apart from agriculture is almost completely dependent on building more subdivisions, assimilating more immigrants; totally dependent on open borders and free trade. And the state government is totally paralyzed and owned by public union employees, because private industry is fleeing the state if not overseas.

It's a shame, California is a beautiful state with a creative, accepting culture. But those same qualities will sew its doom.
User avatar
Synergist
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 68
Joined: Sat 21 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Native Tribe In Maine Sues over LNG Terminal

Postby Revi » Mon 07 Nov 2005, 13:44:13

We may need to find some place to put an LNG terminal. Sable Island is dwindling. Something needs to be figured out and soon. Or the lights can go out. Boston has a terminal. We don't in Maine. That pipeline needs feeding. Where is the nat gas going to come from?

I've heard that the LNG burns much dirtier because of what you have to add to liquify it. There goes the main argument for natural gas. It's not cleaner, has to be brought in from far away, costs a lot. Why not wind?
User avatar
Revi
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7417
Joined: Mon 25 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Maine

Inuit sue US over climate policy

Postby Wildwell » Thu 08 Dec 2005, 17:02:28

People living in the Arctic have filed a legal petition against the US government, saying its climate change policies violate human rights.

The Inuit Circumpolar Conference (ICC) claims the US is failing to control emissions of greenhouse gases, damaging livelihoods in the Arctic.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4511556.stm
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Inuit sue US over climate policy

Postby Specop_007 » Thu 08 Dec 2005, 17:16:00

This is the most ridiculous lawsuit I think I've ever heard of.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Inuit sue US over climate policy

Postby emersonbiggins » Thu 08 Dec 2005, 17:19:59

The offshoring of negative externalities of the American free market have finally come home to roost...err, litigate. :o
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Next

Return to North America Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests