by The_Toecutter » Thu 01 Dec 2005, 21:37:21
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')ow 'bout bicycling & walking as personal transportation? Absolutly oil, coal & nuke free. We can use these personal transport modes along with mass transit.
It works very well, and I agree that we should design our cities to accomodate this mode moreso than the automobile.
However, be realistic. Walking and biking does have its limitations with speed, carrying capacity, exposure to the elements, and a need to be healthy enough to actually expend energy to transport yourself. The car still would have its uses.
I think walking/biking is perfect for short distances, but we're so goddamn sprawled that it is currently dangerous and time consuming. I'd like to see that change. For this change to occur, the car need not be eliminated, however.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')TW, EVs are not feasable because of the batteries hold too little charge
Too little charge for what?
Electric vehicles using NiMH and Lithium batteries can go more than 200 miles per charge at highway speeds of 60-70 miles per hour, even longer at slow city speeds. This is comparable to a gasoline powered car. Most gas cars go 250-350 miles on a full tank. There exist EVs using the above described batteries that can go 250-400 miles per charge. Google search "Solectria Sunrise". Achieved 373 miles per charge at highway driving. "AC Propulsion TZero", routinely achieves 250-320 miles per charge highway driving and can out-accelerate Corvettes and Ferraris. "Eliica", a full size luxury limouasine that can top 240 mph, out-accelerate a Porsche 911, and also do 200-250 miles per charge at highway speeds. "Mitsubishi Eclipse EV", which did 250 miles per charge on the test track and nearly 400 miles per charge driving around urban Japan. "Mitsubishi FTO EV", which did over 1,200 miles of travel in a 24 hour period INCLUDING time spend to charge(The beauty that is a fast charging system...). "Jester EV", an electric built by Greener Energy from a kit car that did over 200 miles per charge. Need I continue?
Range is no longer an issue with advanced batteries. Production volume is the issue. Without mass production for 10,000 or more cars, prices stay well out of reach of the average person. No automaker is mass producing electric cars, so prices stay high. If a company could produce 20,000 or so cars per year, a 150-200 mile range midsize electric car capable of travelling a maximum of 100 mph could feasably be sold at a profit for $12,000-15,000 if equipped with NiMH batteries. Said batteries would be a $4,500-$6,000 replacement every 250,000-400,000 miles. But an oil company bought the battery patent and is sitting on it.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'a')nd/or are too heavy.
A battery pack of NiMH or Lithium batteries to give a midsize electric car 150-200 miles range with no emphasis on efficiency(a Ford Taurus size car or so) would weigh about the same as an internal combustion engine plus muffler plus exhaust plus gas tank plus emission controls plus many other internal combustion exclusive ancillaries.
A modern battery pack would provide no weight penalty whatsoever, and in some cars, could even make the car LIGHTER than its gasoline counterpart.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'N')ot very efficient, them EVs. Nope!
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
by MonteQuest » Thu 01 Dec 2005, 22:54:55
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', ' ')And since modern city life could be served with mass transit, trains & busses that can be electrified, modern affluent living requires no oil.
None. Zilch. Zippo.
Care to rethink that statement? There would be
no modern affluent living without oil.
None. Zilch. Zippo.
Look around you. Not at the cars, but everything else. It 's all made from oil or by oil or transported by oil.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
-

MonteQuest
- Expert

-
- Posts: 16593
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Westboro, MO
-
by dub_scratch » Thu 01 Dec 2005, 23:12:29
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', ' ')And since modern city life could be served with mass transit, trains & busses that can be electrified, modern affluent living requires no oil.
None. Zilch. Zippo.
Care to rethink that statement? There would be
no modern affluent living without oil.
None. Zilch. Zippo.
Look around you. Not at the cars, but everything else. It 's all made from oil or by oil or transported by oil.
I know and thanks for pointing that out. I made that fallacious comment in order to stress a point in this forum. Why is it that people are so willing to let these EVers get away with making such nonsensical claims such as the oil free or oil-lite EV. That is total BS. The EV infrastructure would take a tremendous amount of oil to build & maintain.
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')Just to make it clear what ToeCutter is saying. The electric car requires no oil, except a tiny bit in its manufacture. The current unused grid capacity can be used to power it as people plug in at night off-peak. Additional capacity can be added with coal and nuclear power plants, requiring no oil. 70% of oil consumption is from transportation. Can we connect the dots here??????
by MonteQuest » Thu 01 Dec 2005, 23:25:53
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dub_scratch', ' ')Why is it that people are so willing to let these EVers get away with making such nonsensical claims such as the oil free or oil-lite EV. That is total BS. The EV infrastructure would take a tremendous amount of oil to build & maintain.
In this world of today, nothing is manufactured or transported oil free.
There may be viable, energy efficient vehicles available post-peak, but like the early 1930's, no one will have any
money to buy them.
Peak oil is about the end of cheap oil and the economic ramifications of that. This is the most overlooked aspect of peak oil.
Solutions be damned if you can't buy them!
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
-

MonteQuest
- Expert

-
- Posts: 16593
- Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
- Location: Westboro, MO
-
by The_Toecutter » Fri 02 Dec 2005, 01:48:12
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')here may be viable, energy efficient vehicles available post-peak, but like the early 1930's, no one will have any money to buy them.
That's why it makes sense to implement the solutions *before* peak oil's effects start to show. Otherwise it will be too late. We've got five years or less remaining, but the longer the plateau lasts, the worse the crash will be. Peak could have started now or even a few years ago...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')n this world of today, nothing is manufactured or transported oil free.
It damn well could be, however(and in many local instances, actually is, but I assume you're referring to the developed world on a global scale and not some low tech village on a local scale). The catch is that you'd have to consume far, far less given ecological limitations...
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') know and thanks for pointing that out. I made that fallacious comment in order to stress a point in this forum. Why is it that people are so willing to let these EVers get away with making such nonsensical claims such as the oil free or oil-lite EV. That is total BS. The EV infrastructure would take a tremendous amount of oil to build & maintain.
The amount of oil needed to maintain an alternative energy infrastructure for automobiles and extensive mass transit is likely significantly less than to maintain the current fleet. More than 40% of the oil America consumes is just the fuel for its automobile fleet. That does not include the amount of oil needed to manufacture the millions of new cars built each year, and with every graph I've found on America's oil consumption(from the DOE, EIA, ect.), the oil needed to manufacture cars, maintain roads, and maintain the electric grid and such wasn't even counted in; perhaps it's even insignificant altogether in comparison to oil's key uses such as automobile fuel, jet fuel, plastics, petrochemicals, ect.
According to the EIA, 45.7% of oil went to motor gasoline, 4.4% to still gas refinery fuel, 10.3% to jet fuel, 0.3% to Napthas (solvents and paint thinner), 0.4% to kerosene(illumination, space heating, cooking, tractor fuel), 22.5% to distillate fuel oil(heating oil, diesel fuel, refinery fuel, industrial fuel), 2.9% to petrochemical feedstocks(alcohols, resins, ethers, fibers, medicines, cosmetics), 4.7% to residual fuel oil(boiler fuel, refinery fuel, bunker fuel, wood preservative), 1.2% to lubricants(lubricating oils, greases, transmission oils, household oils, textile spindle oils), 3.2% to asphalt and road oil(paving, roofing, waterproofing), 4.6% to petroleum coke(carbon electrodes, fuel coke, electric switches), 0.2% to aviation gasoline, 4.6% to liquefied refinery gases(petrochemical feedstocks, space heating, cooking, cooking, synthetic rubber), 0.2% to waxes(food preservatives, matches, crayons, candles, pencils, sealing wax, canning wax), and 0.3% to misc. products.
http://www.eia.doe...../petroleum_profile_1999/profile99v8.pdf
Pray tell me, Dub Scratch, just how much oil does it take to manufacture a gas-powered car? No where in the above statistics is included any mention of energy needed to make a car, although if you look at the list above, most of those items have absolutely nothing to do with a car's manufacture. As you can see, the vast majority is motor gasoline in any of the above items that can actually be linked to car use.
An electric car needs absolutely NO motor gasoline. None. Nada. Zero. Judging by the statistics above, that is the bulk of the oil use associated with a gasoline-powered car: it’s fuel. Remove it, and the oil use you have remaining appears very low in comparison. Batteries can be made virtually oil free(they use some plastics and electrical connections, BUT plastics can also be made from plant sources and a minimal amount is needed anyway). They need tires and parts that rely on synthetic fibers, but rubber and those other items can be made from plant derived sources, recycled, and also a negligible number is needed. The only significant oil use an electric car would really need to worry about is the asphalt for the roads it drives on. Currently, there is no oil substitute for that, and even if there were, it is a substantially large number which would take a big chunk out of what nature can provide on a sustainable basis. Electric cars need far less lubricants than a gas car. As for transportation of parts/cars/manufacturing equipment, that can be done oil free by electric rail.
I'd like to find some actual numbers though on just how much oil consumption an electric car would account for over its life cycle today, and just what those processes are so that one could determine which processes can be replaced with renewable sources and which cannot. oil consumption for an EV is certain to be miniscule compared to a gasoline powered car.
What happens when you eliminate both motor vehicle fuel and lubricants from the oil equation for an electric car?
You drastically cut oil consumption, so much so that what you use for the EV may be virtually meaningless. Well, you'd still have roads.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson