by Paul64 » Mon 14 Nov 2005, 08:56:50
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukat', 'N')ow if someone is going to conserve energy, they are putting themselves at a great disadvantage.
Well...as the world works now, yes, if one controls and directs a great use of energy, one is of higher status and can live in a level of comfort and luxury, attract a better mate and so forth. But being at or near the top of the pyramid can bring along its own stresses and miseries. Look at Mr. Bush - do you think he is actually a happy man? I for one wouldn't want to be him and live his life.
In any case, as time goes on, it is obvious there will be less and less energy per capita available. I don't see any way that can be changed. You don't provide any specifics to back up your beliefs that indicate otherwise.
However...less energy use doesn't necessarily mean a bad life for all of the energy-deprived, just a lot of difficulty for those who are overly-dependent on current levels and are unable to adjust.
For those that can't adjust? Well, there is already a lot of misery in the world; we just may see it spread and expand quite a bit. Even these days in the richest nation in the world, many of the very wealthiest living in paid-off mansions and 'enjoying' millions in the bank eventually suffer dread diseases of civilization that modern medicine is helpless to cure...victims sometimes linger for years before death finally and mercifully calls. IMO the gruesome epidemic of chronic disease and its attendant deep misery puts the whole PO issue, and the loss of modern comforts and privileges we will be facing, in perspective.