by Tanada » Tue 08 Nov 2005, 06:37:02
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Taskforce_Unity', 'T')he question is wether reserve growth is an issue or not...
Anyway some new info:
Depletion rates Type I + II + III:
Exxon-Mobil
4-6%
Shell
4-5% (necessary new production to reach 120 mb/d in 2030 --> 90 mb/d)
IEA
8%-10% (necessary new production to reach 120 mb/d in 2030 -->
210 mb/d, check out this presentation slide 14 Depletion rates type II + III (current)
Skrebowski - 3.3 mb/d per year
PONL - 2.4 mb/d per year
So who is right.. If IEA is right then we peak in the coming years, if SKrebowks is right we also do.
I don't think we are depleting that fast though..
But you are completly ignoring dynamic effects, so far as I can tell. While Skrebowski projects 2005 depletion at 3.3 mb/d I have not seen anyone project the effects when everyone goes into depletion. Well that's not quite accurate, if world depletion is 4% after everyone enters the slide and we top out at 90 mb/d we would have 86.4 mb/d the second year and 82.9 mb/d the third year, which is real demand destruction because we currently consume more than that.
This is why I don't beleive in the 'bumpy plateau' so many people have put their faith in as a warning sign. When the super giant fields in SA hit depletion we are going into significant world wide decline.
It only matters up to a point how much reserves you have, geology limits how fast you can pump your reserves especially if most of them are one field.