by Schweinshaxe » Mon 07 Nov 2005, 19:48:48
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Carlhole', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lateStarter', 'W')as AG just too intelligent for the vast majority of American's to get their arms around? I know he used some big words from time to time (environment) , and he actually spoke in complete sentences, but c'mon! Bush doesn't even come across as a good candidate for 'County Commissioner'. I still contend that the US could do just as well by having a lottery drawing for being the next president. Maybe they could use the funds to help all the poor people that are getting what little aid they had left cutoff...
Al Gore DID win the popular vote in 2000. The electoral race, however, was so close that the Supreme Court ruled against further vote counting and declared Bush the winner.
However, both parties in Washington, much as they clash, are corrupt. It's all about the money and it always has been throughout American history - some periods are worse than others.
I wish there were a third party. And I nominate the Libertarians. As it is, the Libertarian share of the total vote is negligible. But they certainly offer a principled political philosophy that can inject good ideas into any debate. The fact that they ARE principled, is the Libertarian Party's primary drawback in Washington.
What about Ralph "Unsafe At Any Speed" Nader? Or Jello Biafra? He was at least running for Mayor of San Fransisco a couple of decades ago. I don't think he was libertarian though.
Feel free to start a trhread about third party president candidates through the years. That would be very interesting. Anyone?