Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Private transportation after PO Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

How to eliminate the private automobile

Poll ended at Wed 23 Nov 2005, 12:44:14

Better public transit! That will draw people out of their cars.
8
No votes
The humble bicycle -- the most efficient way to get around.
5
No votes
A new technology that hasn't been invented yet.
1
No votes
Market forces will take care of it.
4
No votes
Better urban planning and tax penalties/incentives.
12
No votes
We should not eliminate the private automobile. Cars are good.
7
No votes
 
Total votes : 37

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby rogerhb » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 19:31:29

Remove all the road-signs, road-markings, speed-limits, highway-code and vehicle-fitness rules.

This would rapidly increase the number of fatalities on the roads thus making it less desirable except for boy-racers.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby Aedo » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 21:52:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', 'A')nother technology I thought of today as I was bicycling to work -- protective exoskeletons for the riders of two-wheeled vehicles!


Great idea! I am no longer riding my bike to work following a serious accident where I fractured my back after flying over the car that turned into me (on the bright side I didn't end up in a wheelchair!)
User avatar
Aedo
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 176
Joined: Thu 23 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby johnmarkos » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 12:22:07

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aedo', 'G')reat idea! I am no longer riding my bike to work following a serious accident where I fractured my back after flying over the car that turned into me (on the bright side I didn't end up in a wheelchair!)

Oh, no! I'm sorry to hear that. Best wishes for your recovery.

Yes, exoskeletons would be nice for us cyclists.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: What happens to private transportation?

Unread postby Backtosteam » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 12:25:32

Didn't know exactly where to post this, but I didn't want to start another thread. I'm flabbergasted by this article. I see Detroit looking like Philly did in the 60's and 70's after all the manufucturing left the area. My favorite quote has to be...

"By 2010, efficient gas-electric hybrid engines were widely available on the big vehicles Americans wanted from GM and Ford."

They have got to be kidding. Denial is so powerful.


Detroit 2015
User avatar
Backtosteam
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri 15 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby bentstrider » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 17:27:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SHiFTY', 'I') don't think that's realistic; in fact I think that's a totalitarian way of going about things.
What you want to reduce is unneccessary car journeys, especially commuting to work and back. By taxing fuel and providing fast, relable train services, much of europe does this.
Cars are great for holidays, off-peak driving, et ceterera.
For example here in the UK, I catch trains to work every day, costs me 25 pounds a week for a pass. Don't need a car to get to work at all.
If I want to go on holiday, I hire a brand new VW diesel for 100 pounds a weekend. Simple!


That's what I was primarily using my Bronco II for before one of the electronic components took a shit!!
Used my bicycle, bus or walked for everything within 10-15 miles of me.
I got by just fine. Used my vehicle when I knew traffic would nil and none, and when I wanted to go bike-riding in some cool location.
My sister and mother are both jackasses!!
They insist on needing a four-wheeled vehicle for every single trip, no matter how short or long the distance.
With my vehicle being the only one available, they pretty much ran the shit out of it, and now expect me to pay for it!!
The only other job opportunity I have any chance of getting good money in at the moment, is ironically, truck-driving.
Get away from the energy munchers at home, yet am relegated to making myself one. But at least it won't be a career, just a way to get the bills paid down. In the meantime, I'll also look into buying me a new recumbent bike for the trucking job.
If you've seen a truck-stop, you'll know why.
Oh, and as for getting lost in Suburbia, the people that choose to live in those types of developments have more money than they do brainpower.
I've always gotten around and never gotten lost walking or cycling.
Since you move much slower and are aware of surroundings, it's much easier to negotiate traffic.
Too many of the roads nowadays seem to have been designed by retarded ex-fighter pilots with engineering degrees.
Everytime I drive down a typical road, the damn thing banks and twists just like some fighter-jock in a gay dog-fight.
bentstrider
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon 25 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southern California Desert

Unread postby skyemoor » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 20:27:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Tyler_JC', 'A')nd where do you plan on doing with the suburbanites? For the purposes of this little 10 question post, we=suburbanites.

1.We are going to need trains and buses in order to get to work.


Ok, so expand the bus fleet and add light rail.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')2.We are going to need jobs that involve something other than expanding the sprawl.


Renewable energy systems.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')3.We are going to need a way of sending our children to school.


Buses, walking, biking

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')4.We are going to need a way to get to the malls and transport our good back home.


Why? See 1 and 3

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')5.We are going to need a way to get transport children who aren't old enough to walk or bike to soccer practice.


Child's tandem. Of course, I played with kids in my neighborhood at an early age.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')6.We are going to need a new model for a street layout that allows us to get out of our side streets without becoming hopelessly lost.


http://www.carfree.com

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')7.We are going to need a way to get to medical centers in an emergency.


Ambulance. The more one walks and bikes, the longer they live (and more fully, as well)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')8.We are going to need to move all of the important buildings (town officies, post office, police+fire stations) into a central locations


Welcome to Traditional Neighborhood Design

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')9.We are going to need a different model for our houses that allows small scale farming and wood harvesting.


Anyone can have a garden. Forestry is for large lot exurban.

[/quote]
10.And lastly, We are going to need another justification for living (jk, :razz: ).[/quote]

Start by turning off the TV.
http://www.carfree.com
http://ecoplan.org/carshare/cs_index.htm
http://www.velomobile.de/GB/Advantages/advantages.html

Chance favors the prepared mind. -- Louis Pasteur

He that lives upon hope will die fasting. --Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
skyemoor
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1512
Joined: Sat 16 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Appalachian Foothills of Virginia
Top

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Thu 13 Oct 2005, 22:41:13

Hi Macsporan!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Macsporan', 'A')nother thing about cars is that they kill people, lots of them, all the time.

I read somewhere that about 80 million people have died of car since the dawn of the last century. Thats more than WWs I and II combined. And lets not talk about the wounded, paralysed and maimed and what that has cost the world in grief and money. :(

Still less would you want to know what all these roads cost to keep up every year.

They are expensive, inefficient and dangerous so let's be rid of them.

Me, I'm a train nut.


LOL, so am I!

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('macsporan', ' ')'Thomas the Tank Engine' is my best friend. So let's do rail between cities, light rail (tramcars) within them. These can be electrified so as to run off the grid. Trains can carry goods and people at one third of the cost of motor vehicles and maintainance costs for them are very small. Steel rails wear a lot more slowly than bitumen roads.


YUP, and they can be recycled, too - plus the mere fact of running loads ON a rail means that it's 6.5 to 9 TIMES more efficient than road travel.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('macsporan', 'W')hat we need to do as PO looms is run a crash construction program for railways. Restore the ones we have and extend them. Build them over the roads, double track if possible. This will become easier with time as the suburbs thin out we'll be able to knock routes through them hither and yon.


Why do we need to knock anything over, MacSporan? Oh, I agree, some of the McMansions are so ugly they deserve it, but, as I have asked before and will ask again: who is gunna be using the ROADS? So why not use them as right-of-way?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('macsporan', 'I')f you have a good service with a tram/train arriving every ten minutes and no one more than ten minutes away from one that's all the transport you could possibly want.

We're going to have to be inventive and learn how to carry people's bicycles, prams and shopping inside the carriages. I'm sure it can be done.


LOLl, this is something I DO know about: yep, not only can it be done, IT is done, MacSporan.

As you're aware of, I'm involved with trying to stop the idiots ripping out our railway line into the heart of my home-town so they can sell the property to the good ole Yuppies who really do want that land.

Now, there's a lot of people who come down from Maitland to Newcastle, (surfies) who carry their surfboards / wetsuits / boogie boards; prams (if applicable) etc on the train and say that it would be nearly impossible to do so on a bus (they are right). They wanna replace the trains with busses, y'see.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('macsporan', 'S')o shoot the Fat Controller, rise up and learn to love trains.

:roll:

LOL, well, you;'re preachin' to the choir, there, Macsporan!

(He'd you see last night's ABC program on William Wallace? What I wouldn't give to let him loose (with broadsword and bad temper) in Parliament House!

My Mum, who is very Scottish, loved every minute of it and provided a voice over about how treacherous Edward King of England was.)
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia
Top

Re: What happens to private transportation?

Unread postby DarkDawg » Tue 18 Oct 2005, 14:35:51

Hydrogen vehicles are a reality. The problem is infrastructure and building all the necessary refueling stations. The good news is that with renewable energy (Hydro, Solar), producing Hydrogen can ultimately be the cleanest path. Like others have said; however, the future problems come in terms of cost for the masses, and production of all the other necessary components, steel, plastics, tires, etc...

My money is on horses and disagree on them being too expensive. They pay for themselves in terms of the work they can produce. A single horse can haul a lot more weight than any human on a bike, and do it faster, especially in mountainous regions. They can be used to pump water or plow fields or any other brute-force labor that will be required when tshtf. Trust me, you will want a loyal mount and good sword come panic time. A bike won't get you through the crazy mobs.

As for using horses strictly for personal travel, like commuting, then it really depends on the distance and terrain. Bikes do have many advantages as long as roads are smooth and relatively flat. We can't all be like Lance!
User avatar
DarkDawg
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 156
Joined: Mon 17 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Saratoga County, NY

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 12:47:37

New poll on the private automobile and how/whether to eliminate it.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby FatherOfTwo » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 12:57:44

I wish I could vote for bicycles, but they don't work everywhere all of the time. Ever tried riding a bike in -40 with 3 feet of snow? Fun when you're a teenager, dangerous and frustrating when you're an adult trying to get to work.
It's either got to be more telecommuting, better public transport or a radically more efficient form of personal transportation (assuming we have the spare energy and time to transform the infrastructure.)

My $0.02.
User avatar
FatherOfTwo
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 960
Joined: Thu 11 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Heart of Canada's Oil Country

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 12:58:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he anti-smoking movement would be a good model. Get the trial lawyers to hit car companies, municipalities and car drivers with a barrage of lawsuits. Certainly, cars are producing toxic fumes like cigarettes. My brother told me (I don't know if this is right or not) that sampling near high-volume roads shows the soil to be contaminated with heavy metals like a toxic waste dump. Maybe you can file some sort of action with the EPA. Lots for planned roadways and parking lots could be combed for endangered species, no matter how minute. Car manufacturers could also be sued like gun manufacturers, for contributing to the death of human beings. In short, any excuse, no matter how flimsy, should be exploited to entangle automakers/developers/oil companies in litigation. You're bound to run into some sympathetic judges or juries somewhere in the system. Anyway, the goal isn't so much to win the lawsuits, but to use an L. Ron Hubbard style strategy of harassing car culture with the legal system.

People with respiratory/allergy problems may be very enthusiastic about "no car zones".


Clever, and very appropriate for the USA! I wonder which organizations might be interested in pursuing this route. Or rather, if we look to the anti-smoking movement as a model, where is the best place to start? What was the anti-smoking movement doing in, say, 1960 (a date analogous to today in that chapter of history)?
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby untothislast » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:05:22

The best way to eradicate our dependence on the private automobile, would be by making everywhere so homogeneous that no one feels the need to travel. We could do this by introducing completely bland styles of architecture - making extensive use of featureless concrete and glass - and by having exactly the same shops, malls and department stores in every . . . oh, yeah, we're already doing it.
User avatar
untothislast
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 686
Joined: Sat 22 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: European Capital of Kulcha 2008

Re: How to eliminate the private automobile

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:16:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('FatherOfTwo', 'I') wish I could vote for bicycles, but they don't work everywhere all of the time. Ever tried riding a bike in -40 with 3 feet of snow? Fun when you're a teenager, dangerous and frustrating when you're an adult trying to get to work.


Maybe a human-powered snowmobile would do the trick. Starts great in cold weather (with hot coffee and some oatmeal).
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

Unread postby ALBY » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:46:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he anti-smoking movement would be a good model. Get the trial lawyers to hit car companies, municipalities and car drivers with a barrage of lawsuits.


Clever, and very appropriate for the USA! I wonder which organizations might be interested in pursuing this route. Or rather, if we look to the anti-smoking movement as a model, where is the best place to start? What was the anti-smoking movement doing in, say, 1960 (a date analogous to today in that chapter of history)?


For the record, I am not a smoker.

However, I would humbly sumbit that relying on lawyers to litigate the auto industry out of business is a monsterously bad idea.

First of all, lawyers are the handmaiden of everything evil. They are. What you would essentiually have them do is sue one class of business out of existence to enrich another, namely themselves. {Arguably, an even lower form of corporate pariah.} Spend any time in a civil courtroom and you will feel the same way. In a previous life, I was involved in insurance litigation as the assistant to the general counsel of an Insurance company. Let me just say, that right, wrong or indifferent, it is simply a disgusting process.

To anyone that feels that the anti smoking movement is a wild success, I would point out that smoking regulations are antithetical to personal liberty. In NYC, you cannot even open an exclusively smoking restaurant if you wanted to. IE, a place just for smokers. WTF is that about ?

Also, the streets are littered with dirty butts and you must navigate a crowd of smokers in front of every door. Surely, there must be someplace where these addicts can use their product. Like the smoking rooms in airports or something.

I would point to these as the unintended consequences of a short sighted policy promoted by single minded zeaolots. After all, the tyranny of the majority is still tyranny. To those that want to upbraid me re health effects to the smoker: mind your own business. The spectre of health nazi's determining what we can or cannot ingest is not desirable. You need only look at prohibition or the current war on drug users to see that the folly of such thinking. With regard to second hand smoke, point taken, I hate it too. But YOU and I could simply avoid the smoking establishments or zones. A small price to pay to preserve our liberty.

Additionally, unlike smoking, nearly every american has benefited from the modern suburban economy that was enabled by automobile. The government (we the people) designed policies to promote car use, regulated the shit out of it and the suburbnan sprawl economy has provided employment and generated national wealth (in the short term ?!). To turn around and burn up our remaining national wealth in a devisive fit of revisionist self loathing would be tragic to say the least.

People need to embrace the new model , whatever that may be, voluntarily. At some point, even addicts recognize that all of their problems have become one problem.
User avatar
ALBY
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Baltimore County, Md
Top

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:50:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', 'T')o turn around and burn up our remaining national wealth in a devisive fit of revisionist self loathing would be tragic to say the least.


psychology of previous investment
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby ALBY » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 14:03:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', 'p')sychology of previous investment


Not at all.

I'm ready for the next thing. I just think depending on lawyers and the courts is a poor way to go about doing it.
User avatar
ALBY
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Baltimore County, Md
Top

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 14:11:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', '
')Not at all.

I'm ready for the next thing. I just think depending on lawyers and the courts is a poor way to go about doing it.


I agree. Litigation is not the way to go to eliminate, or (more accurately), curb the use of the automobile.
Simply remove the government incentives for it. The market will surely follow.

:)
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 14:30:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('johnmarkos', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JohnDenver', 'T')he anti-smoking movement would be a good model. Get the trial lawyers to hit car companies, municipalities and car drivers with a barrage of lawsuits.

Clever, and very appropriate for the USA! I wonder which organizations might be interested in pursuing this route. Or rather, if we look to the anti-smoking movement as a model, where is the best place to start? What was the anti-smoking movement doing in, say, 1960 (a date analogous to today in that chapter of history)?

People need to embrace the new model , whatever that may be, voluntarily. At some point, even addicts recognize that all of their problems have become one problem.


The point is not just to pick on the auto industry because I hate cars (although I do). There is real harm being done here. Read "The Externalities of Car Use" to get an idea of what I'm talking about.

I'm pretty anti-authoritarian myself. However, I recognize that conventional free-market thinking does not deal with externalities. Take the smoking example. What about a child living in an apartment upwind from a place where people smoke? Or what about someone who gets a job waiting tables to support a family? If that job is the best available, the worker is essentially forced into an unhealthy work environment. I agree that there are problems with the law as it stands. However, the examples you cite could be fixed with a little tweaking (create special smoking lounges, allow special exemptions for some bars and restaurants, perhaps in return for greater "health hazard" pay).

Returning to cars, there are property implications as well as damages to health. If the strength and frequency of recent hurricanes can be ascribed to global climate change, then the auto's obvious property damages already reach into the hundreds of billions in the U.S. alone.
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

Unread postby ALBY » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 14:48:27

[quote="johnmarkosIf the strength and frequency of recent hurricanes can be ascribed to global climate change, then the auto's obvious property damages already reach into the hundreds of billions in the U.S. alone.[/quote]

obvious ? really ? how would you apportion damages between peronal autos, electric generating plants, chemical plants and other polluters ? here ? overseas ?

also, who would you litigate against ?

the government basically built the interstate system, taxes fuel, issues drivers licenses, cafe standards.. etc. what liability do auto manufacturers and oil companies really have considering the widespread government promotion and subsidy of personal automobiles and the attendant infrastructure ?

point is, we have nobody to blame but ourselves. the idea of litigating against corporations in these matters is preposterous. in fact, i could argue that the litigous nature of our society is a contributing factor to the clusterfuck in which we now find ourselves.
User avatar
ALBY
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Baltimore County, Md

Unread postby johnmarkos » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 14:56:37

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('ALBY', 'p')oint is, we have nobody to blame but ourselves.

I agree, and we should pay in the form of high taxes on gasoline that discourage driving in the same way that cigarette taxes discourage smoking. Since fossil fuel energy use is roughly equal to carbon dioxide emissions, a petroleum tax makes it easy to split costs among users.

As for the auto industry, I think they bear some blame for manufacturing the machine that pollutes the atmosphere. Maybe the car companies and the drivers could split the climate change penalty 50/50. Car makers would pay a per-vehicle fee based on anticipated emissions.

I'm not really concerned with whom we litigate against. IANAL (I am not a lawyer). My point is that we have to change the system so that car makers, the oil and gas industries, drivers, et cetera pay for the externalities of their activity.

So you don't like lawsuits? I agree -- they're ugly. What's a better way to do it?
User avatar
johnmarkos
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 19 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: San Francisco, California
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron