Peak Oil
Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.
Post a reply

Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Midnightblue » Wed 19 Oct 2005, 19:42:32

I don't know about you guys .. but I am a little bit
concerned about the Harriert Miers deal. I've a
conservative by nature -- but do want a lot of
diversity on the higher court .. especially when it
comes to the real big issues.

Does anyone know anything about her voting record or
anything like that?

I found some information about her here:
http://www.townhall.com/blogs/c-log/J%2 ... 59236.html

and the homepage of this site seems to have some
updated news:
http://www.townhall.com

but seems like a lot of stuff to read thru .. can
anyone give me an overview?


Midnightblue :)
User avatar
Midnightblue
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri 14 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Thu 20 Oct 2005, 01:44:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Midnightblue', 'I') don't know about you guys .. but I am a little bit
concerned about the Harriert Miers deal. I've a
conservative by nature -- but do want a lot of
diversity on the higher court .. especially when it
comes to the real big issues.
GWB made an extensive study of all lawyers and judges who might be qualified to serve on the SC and it just happened that his personal lawyer was most qualified :o .
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 12:02:07

Image
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby khebab » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:01:40

Can somebody can explain to me what's the big deal about Miers? I'm not American so I'm having a hard time understanding what's seem to be the problem. She seems to be very competent and will probably do the job very well. Is she too conservative? not enough? or colorless?
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 13:15:17

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', 'C')an somebody can explain to me what's the big deal about Miers? I'm not American so I'm having a hard time understanding what's seem to be the problem. She seems to be very competent and will probably do the job very well. Is she too conservative? not enough? or colorless?


Well, she's not conservative enough for some, but some say she's devoutly religious, as if that would suffice. I, for one, hope she checks her beliefs at the door. Others say its cronyism - I started out thinking this and haven't ventured far from it (ref. former FEMA head & new Chairman/Fed Reserve for examples of this) Others say we don't know enough about her to make a decision - I probably fall here as well.

This cartoon seems to sum it up nicely:

Image
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Eli » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 16:01:27

Khebab I agree with what Emmer said.

Meirs has absolutely no experience as a judge. Constitutional law is totally unlike any other kind of law, it is not the kind of law practiced by a private lawyer which is all she is.

It sure reeks to high heaven of cronyism. I think it really made a lot of people upset that she just has no experience in constitutional law.

You do not make a premed student chief of surgery.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Mon 24 Oct 2005, 19:11:42

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-5367144,00.html]Bush Won't Release All Miers Records (link)[/url]
Monday October 24, 2005 10:16 PM

AP Photo DCSA102

By DAVID ESPO

AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON (AP) - Risking a possible clash with the Senate, President Bush insisted Monday he will not turn over documents detailing the private advice that Supreme Court nominee Harriet Miers has given him while serving in the White House.

...skip...
``In other words, they've asked for paperwork about the decision- making process, what her recommendations were,'' Bush said.

Can't know what she knows!

Bush just appointed a woman to the US Supreme Court who has absolutely no judicial experience whatsoever. Her prime qualification seems to be that Bush knows her personally. While America's hugely, massively, incredibly, overwhelmingly corrupt legal system is reviled throughout the world, though not in America proper, usually such an appointment carries at least the appearance of propriety. This was like Bush naming his mother to be Captain of an aircraft carrier. Clearly, Bush does not think we will have to live with the legacy of his appointment.

What do you think they talk about?
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby The_Toecutter » Tue 25 Oct 2005, 01:54:23

Next thing you know, his dog will be his new advisor should Rove ever have to 'resign'.
The unnecessary felling of a tree, perhaps the old growth of centuries, seems to me a crime little short of murder. ~Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
The_Toecutter
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2142
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Keith_McClary » Tue 25 Oct 2005, 02:45:39

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('The_Toecutter', 'N')ext thing you know, his dog will be his new advisor should Rove ever have to 'resign'.

Wasn't there some Roman emperor who appointed his horse :o ? What do we know about Bush's dog, the one he was carrying off AirForce 1 while NO was drowning? Is his dog a better SC judge than the Roman horse?

At least, dogs have reliable prejudices on reproductive issues.
User avatar
Keith_McClary
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 7344
Joined: Wed 21 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Suburban tar sands
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Permanently_Baffled » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 09:05:32

Looks like Miers has withdrawn her application!

What is your take on this? Political pressure?
User avatar
Permanently_Baffled
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1151
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: England
Top

Re: Harriet Miers Supreme Court Nomination

Unread postby Eli » Thu 27 Oct 2005, 09:54:41

My take is that they did all they could and could not get the votes to appoint her and rather than give Bush a black eye she was asked to withdraw.

I also think this was totally Bush's idea to appoint her with out much input from others that is why it was such a bad choice he did it all by himself I think he was like "hey I know real good lawyer". Moron.

The other thing is most likely Rove and others have been indited and Bush needs all the political capital he can get right now he has no ability to fight for Meirs.

If on the outside chance Cheney is indited all hell will break loose in the US.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river
Top
Post a reply

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests



cron