by pup55 » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 15:08:06
It's all about reproduction.
Every society has its way of establishing a social structure so as to attract desirable mates, so as to raise healty offspring and pass down "desirable" genetic material to the next generation.
In our society, it is pretty well engrained by about the 7th grade that a big house and cool car is an indicator of status and desirability for mating purposes. This is not unique to the US. English literature is full of this sort of thing. In Asia, and Africa, a system of matchmaking/arranged marriages/dowry has developed to accomplish the same thing. The advertisers picked up on this years ago.
So in short, the reason most people do not take to the streets (or the woods, for that matter) is that if they do, they will not be able to get a date.
Of course, there will always be an element of "animal magnetism", pheromones, physical attributes, and to an extent, if you are really good looking (or good smelling, presumably) you will still be able to find a mate, but I must say, if my daughter starts dating street bums, we are going to have to have a talk, peak oil or not. You have some social stigma to overcome.
My own theory is this system has started to break down a little bit because of the availability of easy credit. It used to be, at least in the US, that you sort of had to have it together to be able to afford a big house and a cool car. You either had to be intelligent, or persuasive, or have some other ability that society rewarded you for. At the very least, you had to be kind of a nice, responsible guy, or the bank would not lend you the money. So, maybe for awhile, the system worked. Now, however, with easy credit, even an idiot can have a big house and a cool car. Therefore, there are a lot of incorrect signals being sent out, and people end up with inappropriate mates. I am sure if you track the divorce rate compared to the consumer debt since 1970, there would be a strong correlation, and people will obviously blame this on incresed pressures, two income families, etc. but I hypothesize that some amount of this is due to bad choosing of mates due to incorrect signals being sent out as to the desirability of a given jerk from a reproduction standpoint because they happen to have a given level of material posessions.
Incredibly, the availability of easy credit makes it possible to overcome some of the animal issues as well. A popular TV show, "Extreme Makeover" is based on the idea that with some amount of plastic surgery, which presumably you can also charge up on your credit card, you can overcome what nature gave you in order to attract a better mate. Talk about sending an incorrect signal!
Anyway, the above might make an interesting Master's thesis or Doctoral Dissertation if anybody cared to do research in to this matter.
Last edited by
pup55 on Thu 23 Jun 2005, 08:03:49, edited 1 time in total.