by ubercynicmeister » Thu 13 Oct 2005, 23:31:18
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('something_awfull', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('peaker_2005', '
')
- Some economies will have a quick turnaround for energy conversion reasonably quickly - generally, the smaller the economy and country and the more vast the rail network for the country's size (Australia, for example has a LOT of rail for a country with only 20 million people).
Problem here, particuraly in the Eastern states of Australia, the rail system, particuarly in regional/country area's, (where the produce comes from) has been decommission and basically left to rot in favour of truck haulage.
We usually go down to the Tumut region (Snowy mountains hydro-electric scheme), their raillink and facilities were decommissioned a decade or so ago, now just rotting away, I looked at it and said to my wife, "they're gonna wish they didn't do that".
They are regretting it RIGHT NOW, But the Angle Grinder (Nick Greiner) govt wanted to make usre their mates in the Trucking Industry got their profits - and let's not forget that good ole Bruce Baird was transport minister - someone who basically defined rail travel as "belonging in a museum".
Mind you the Truckies have now accepted the reality of rail travel and are quietly joining the queue:
Trouble is - the downsized railways can't handle the increased traffic. And the "tinkering at the edges" approach which is now being adopted, even as the "cross Sydney Road Tunnel" debacle sucks up more and more money, when it could be better spent on rail...OH, well, we all know where the priorities for the NSW govt lie: with road, exclusively.