Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Global Economy (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby Vexed » Wed 28 Sep 2005, 18:58:40

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')o, even post-peak oil, even after the collapse of the dollar, etc. the debate is all about the good ol' USA. Quite illuminating really.


Should I outline a prediction for France? How about India? Or China?
All would probably be equally interesting, as well as different.

What is illuminating about the fact that I chose to write about where I live, intead of picking another locale to speculate on?
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby elroy » Fri 30 Sep 2005, 07:12:04

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'R')egulation for regulation's sake is always a disastrous endeavour. ... Politicians are certainly not going to spend any time thinking about this.
Visit Europe some time. :-D
User avatar
elroy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 316
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Netherlands

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby spudbuddy » Fri 30 Sep 2005, 12:36:20

We did say goodbye and good riddance to globalization.....
it hasn't shown up on this thread in quite some time, now.
To recap:
Global trade requires a lot of non-renewable energy (unless we wish to return to trade-wind assisted sailing ships.)
Global trade as practised by transnationals has encouraged a race to the bottom, as far as labor costs are concerned.
Global trade has killed a lot of living wage jobs in high-income countries, which has created enormous resentment.
To whit:

The $5-$10 dollar gallon of gas.
The upside down home equity fiasco.
The mid-career middle aged income drop.
The college-educated Starbucks supervisor.

To a good transnational, labor costs are like a bad hangover after a good drunk.
The idea is that we don't make things, we make money.
Workers just get in the way of that.
Workers are like a bad infection that invades the sanctified environment of sanitized, antiseptic corporate sensibility.

Enough money sits in offshore accounts to turn the whole damned thing around...meanwhile what we get is endless rhetoric about what we can't afford and why.

Global competitiveness has become the mantra for planetary suicide, shot straight from the hip.
A pissing contest. Mine is bigger than yours. Who cares how I got there?
-takes a lot of beer to to create that stream...
-takes a lot of oil.

Avoidance? Academics? Religion? Infotainment?
Whatever distraction suits your pocketbook, your mantleshelf, your dashboard.

Take a good look at the inside of a Wal*mart.
Take a good look at the uniformed squeeky smile of a McJobbed bottom feeder.
Take a real good look at the shifty-eyed smirk of the Fuehrer...
(whichever flavor suits your palet)
-the resentment aforementioned,
Seattle '99 was just a taste.
User avatar
spudbuddy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby Dezakin » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 15:33:10

Guess the creative destruction of farm jobs in the industrial revolution was something you missed.
User avatar
Dezakin
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1569
Joined: Wed 09 Feb 2005, 04:00:00

Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby deMolay » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 21:52:54

Does it look to you that the economy is about to Tank? Companies have not been in such shape since the Depression
$88 billion in debt may become junk
By CAROLINE SALAS
Bloomberg News

More than $88 billion of U.S. corporate debt is teetering on the edge of investment grade and soon may join the record amount of bonds downgraded to junk this year.

Hertz Corp., the world's largest car rental firm, and radio broadcaster Clear Channel Communications are among 46 companies that probably will be categorized as noninvestment grade, according to credit-rating company Standard & Poor's.

A surge in debt-financed takeovers and concern that higher oil prices will hurt profit growth is eviscerating credit quality in the $5 trillion market for corporate bonds, according to some strategists.

Investors face greater risks, while companies once considered safe and now classified as so-called "fallen angels" may see borrowing costs rise.

Not since the Depression of 1929 has corporate America received so many black eyes. General Motors, the world's largest automaker, Sears Holdings Corp., the biggest U.S. department store chain, and Eastman Kodak Co., the largest photography company, led 27 borrowers whose $499 billion of outstanding debt obligations suffered the ignominy of being downgraded to junk.

And if history is any guide, there will be no rebound soon. "You don't see companies get downgraded and work their way up, by and large," said Greg Peters, head of U.S. credit strategy at New York-based Morgan Stanley.

Peters should know. His firm helped the finance unit of Ford Motor Co., the second-largest U.S. automaker, sell $750 million of bonds in March that S&P lowered to BB+, or junk, on May 5. Bonds rated below BBB- at S&P or below Baa3 at Moody's Investors Service are considered junk.


Twice the default rate
Fallen angels default at almost twice the rate of companies that never had investment-grade ratings, and seven of 10 stay junk, S&P said in a March study analyzing 24 years of data. The junk bond market is about $1 trillion in size.

"The credit cycle has probably already peaked," said Steve Kellner, head of credit portfolios at Newark, N.J.-based Prudential Investment Management's fixed-income group. The firm manages $163 billion in fixed income, including $13 billion in junk bonds.

S&P last week put the debt of GM and Ford under review for another downgrade because of concerns about North American losses and high gasoline prices. GM is rated BB by S&P, or two levels below investment grade.

The combined $320 billion in bonds sold by GM and Ford sent the dollar value of fallen angels past the $202 billion record set in 2002, which included the WorldCom downgrade.

The number of companies that became fallen angels this year is eight more than the same period of 2004. Hertz, which is the target of a leveraged buyout, and San Antonio-based Clear Channel, the biggest radio broadcaster, have the lowest investment-grade credit ratings, and may be lowered to speculative grade, S&P said.


618 companies on the brink
Overall, 618 companies are on the verge of having their ratings cut, compared with 318 that are poised for an upgrade, S&P said.

The firm has tracked the data for less than a year.

Companies with the highest junk ratings pay about 90 basis points, or 0.90 percentage point, more in yield than companies at the lowest end of investment grade, according to Merrill Lynch & Co. index data.

The difference represents an extra $900,000 in annual interest expense for every $100 million borrowed. The gap averaged about 104 basis points in 2004.

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mp ... ss/3387898
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby jmacdaddio » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 22:02:43

With the federal gov't borrowing at insane levels, it's no wonder US companies have fallen in line, not to mention everyday US consumers. Scary stuff.
User avatar
jmacdaddio
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 212
Joined: Sat 14 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby rogerhb » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 22:37:49

How do you win a war? Cut taxes and no-bid reconstruction contracts.

How do you rebuild a city? Cut taxes and no-bid reconstruction contracts.

There is a pattern forming here.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby jaws » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 22:38:11

The North American economy has been trashed by 10 years of insane government intervention in the US and it is now coming apart. The Asian economy looks to be semi-autonomous now and it will probably go through the US crash with a simple recession. The European (continental) economy is waking up after a few years of underinvestment and deflationary growth, and the promise of political-economic reforms is attracting back investors (most of whom are fleeing the US).
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby rogerhb » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 22:57:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaws', 'T')he North American economy has been trashed by 10 years of insane government intervention in the US and it is now coming apart. The Asian economy looks to be semi-autonomous now and it will probably go through the US crash with a simple recession. The European (continental) economy is waking up after a few years of underinvestment and deflationary growth, and the promise of political-economic reforms is attracting back investors (most of whom are fleeing the US).


Hmm, the evils of moderated socialism, they may fare better than the nation formally known as the US of A.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby jaws » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 23:08:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '
')Hmm, the evils of moderated socialism, they may fare better than the nation formally known as the US of A.

What do you think ruined the USA? Socialism.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby Eli » Tue 11 Oct 2005, 23:34:46

Oh please, Asia only has been doing well cause they sell all the crap they make in the US market.

To think that Europe is going to fare better when Germany already has high unemployment is nuckin futs. The massive social welfare programs in Europe are not going to keep on going in the face of higher unemployment and the programs will drag them down fast when the tax base is destroyed.

China and all of Asia will do well in the future when they get their fusion reactors on line. As long as China has cheap and non-polluting energy sources they will do well. I predict in the year 2020 every family in China will have a flying car.

China has been buying all the US debt and guess what?
The US can't pay but thanks for all the great stuff.

Do not kid your self the fall of the US economy and wait for it... PO is going to completely screw this big blue ball.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby aldente » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 00:28:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('deMolay', 'S')an Antonio-based Clear Channel, the biggest radio broadcaster, have the lowest investment-grade credit ratings, and may be lowered to speculative grade, S&P said.


I am surprised to hear this after reading an article in the Nation magazine roughly a year ago about this octopus that essentially occupies the largest load of air-space when it comes to owning radio stations as a network.

In terms of influencing public opinion they have the weight of any of the real large companies that "cannot go bancrupt" since they are part of the building blocks that hold the ship together.

The fact that those guys are nose diving as far as their trading value is concerned is probably a desirable effect in the larger picture and this refers not to a hostile outsider point of view.

Anyone else smelling that rat?



Image
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby UIUCstudent01 » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 00:41:54

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaws', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '
')Hmm, the evils of moderated socialism, they may fare better than the nation formally known as the US of A.

What do you think ruined the USA? Socialism.


In what ways is the USA 'socialist'?

If we were decently socialist we would at least have national health care... we wouldn't have the poverty exposed at New Orleans (or any other city if you looked out your window). If the USA was decently socialist it wouldn't pay farmers to stop their food production or whatever they do...

Blaming it on the USA being 'socialist' is laughable... (What? The programs to help pay the extremely poor Walgreens and Micky D's workers for their apartment, food, and their kid?)

(Unless you, of course, meant socialist in regards to the rich...)
https://www.videogamevoters.org/ http://www.savetheinternet.com/ http://www.votersforpeace.us/index.jsp
www.911myths.com - To the 9/11-ers, give it some thought.
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby jaws » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 00:48:41

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UIUCstudent01', '(')Unless you, of course, meant socialist in regards to the rich...)
That's exactly what I meant. Combined with the rampant war socialism, the USA is more and more aligned with a form of socialism that once went by the name National-Socialism.
User avatar
jaws
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun 24 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby Colorado-Valley » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 01:47:22

Heh, heh ... that's about right.
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby deMolay » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 20:48:08

I think it is the massive trade imbalance with China and India that has bankrupted the USA. China has 700 million workers who work without safety concerns or enviromental concerns for .03 cents an hour. The west is awash in well made cheap asian goods. The US having to bare the burden of world policeman has unfairly penalized them as well. The decent into chaos has begun. I think before it is over those that see China as a saviour will find the that rowing on the communist slave ship will produce a lot of misery and death.
User avatar
deMolay
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2671
Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby rogerhb » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 21:14:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('deMolay', 'T')he US having to bare the burden of world policeman has unfairly penalized them as well.


I think the US volunteered for that role, and not necessarily as the good cop.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby oilluber » Wed 12 Oct 2005, 23:58:44

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jaws', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '
')Hmm, the evils of moderated socialism, they may fare better than the nation formally known as the US of A.

What do you think ruined the USA? Socialism.


what the US has is anything but socialism.
The fat cats live in their castles while the
common folks stay alive on credit cards and debt.
User avatar
oilluber
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 493
Joined: Sun 03 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby DesertBear2 » Thu 13 Oct 2005, 00:29:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('UIUCstudent01', '
')In what ways is the USA 'socialist'?



During the progressive tide of the early 20th century and into the Great Depression, the wealthy folks who run this country were truly worried that a working class revolution would occur....and they would end up losing everything. The solution was a mixed system whereby the great energies that are unleashed by an enterprenurial system were to be balanced by a safety net which would give some basic economic protections to the working classes. And thereby maintain the status quo of elite rule but also defuse any serious sentiment toward social upheaval.

These days, the average American has spent so much time in front of the TV and mindless mass entertainment, that their brains have been wiped nearly clean of the understandings of how power functions in society. And they are playing the role of consumer milk cow to predatory corporate interests and their bought-and-paid-for political running dogs. No longer do Americans understand the principles of a free society or how to exercise mass political power to bring the economic interests and corrupt politicians to heel. It's much like the bread-and-circus situation in the latter days of Rome- basic subsistence rations and lots of violent entertainment.

Welcome the new masters of Amerika- big pharmaceutical, financial, and military/industrial corporations.
DesertBear2
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 514
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: BlueRidgeVA
Top

Re: Is The N.A./Global Economy Tanking

Postby cornholio » Thu 13 Oct 2005, 01:26:02

Re: US "socialism" and "safety net"... (Medicare/Medicaid, Social Security) are "pay as you go." When the demographics of the baby-boomers retirement encounters a declining workforce and peak oil there will be a choice... Reduce social programs drastically or increase taxes. As the aged Republican baby boomers will be a voting majority Im guessing that tax increases will be in our future : ( I dont think we can blame these social programs for our current demise, but wait a few years...).

Image
Image
User avatar
cornholio
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri 26 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: MO, USA

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron