Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Road & Highway Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Unread postby aldente » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 03:26:33

This Roman street in Andalucia is about 2000 years old. We will likewise leave traces!

Image
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Doly » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 03:30:24

Romans used stone for their roads. Stone lasts much longer.
User avatar
Doly
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 4370
Joined: Fri 03 Dec 2004, 04:00:00

Unread postby shakespear1 » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 03:34:49

Mother Nature knows how to clean-up after us. She will send the broom (tornaido), vacuum cleaner ( hurricane ) and the hose Severe Rain Storms and all will be just like before. :-D

But the trouble makers will be gone. :twisted:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby MD » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 03:41:22

The build standards for the main roads of Rome far exceeded US standards. It is all in the road base, not the top coat.
Have you notice many miles of interstate require rework after only ten years of service? Have you noticed the base is often only inches deep?
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 04:48:39

Yeah Roman roads were built in layers and layers, they were meant to last a LONG time before needing repair.

At least bike trails can be skinny, and across country it may be like mountain bike trails. In town, using stones, it may be possible to keep pretty nice roads together.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Unread postby LadyRuby » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 09:38:39

It's going to get worse since road building and repairing needs oil:

http://morningsentinel.mainetoday.com/n ... 9688.shtml

High cost of oil forcing state to cut back on resurfacing:

AUGUSTA -- The state may have to cut back the scope of some highway paving projects because of the rising price of oil.

In addition to being the source of the diesel fuel used to move construction materials, power graders and steamrollers, oil also is a key ingredient in asphalt.
User avatar
LadyRuby
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1177
Joined: Mon 13 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Western US

Unread postby shakespear1 » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 09:45:22

So we are learning how to conserve Petroleum!!!! See, there is light :-D
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Wildwell » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 09:55:20

It always amazes me how companies rave on about replacement fuels for cars yet often the road infrastructure is completely overlooked.

With a reduction in traffic/coupled with riding costs of maintenance at some stage some roads won't be economical to maintain.

BTW, Nissan is now looking for a replacement for steel as it's getting a bit costly for the mass market….

Got my interest anyway..

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/newspaper/ ... 30,00.html
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Unread postby aldente » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 11:13:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('I_Like_Plants', 'Y')eah Roman roads were built in layers and layers, they were meant to last a LONG time before needing repair.


You seem to be absolutely correct. I did some research and found this:

Image

The layers combined are about a meter thick!
User avatar
aldente
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 1554
Joined: Fri 20 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Unread postby Barbara » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 12:37:53

Roman Empire lasted 1000 years, not 100. :twisted:

(Barbara the peakoil.com Roman)
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Unread postby eastbay » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 12:51:43

Yes, traces are what will remain.... and they won't be very useful after this happens:

http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/special ... /b005.html

And there will be no way to clean up the mess either.

Driving on I-580 near where I live, the cracks and holes in the freeway form and grow very quickly, and the repair just isn't keeping up like it should. I ride a motorcycle and learn which ones to avoid.

But remember, there is a Stupid War to pay for.

EastBay
User avatar
eastbay
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7186
Joined: Sat 18 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: One Mile From the Columbia River

Unread postby shakespear1 » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 13:54:14

eastbay

That is exactly the point. What could those 300 billion dollars spent have bought us instead of the mess in Iraq/Afganistan?

Super research labs to work on alternate energy and conservation, grants to do this work, scholarships to motivate students to go in these directions instead of programming GAMEBOY or iPod. :twisted:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby Wildwell » Wed 22 Jun 2005, 14:07:12

General history of tarmac construction:

- Started 1824 Paris
- Became more widespread around 1875 onwards

Modern tarred roads were the result of the work of two Scottish engineers, Thomas Telford and John Loudon McAdam. Telford designed the system of raising the foundation of the road in the center to act as a drain for water. Thomas Telford (born 1757) improved the method of building roads with broken stones by analyzing stone thickness, road traffic, road alignment and gradient slopes. Eventually his design became the norm for all roads everywhere. John Loudon McAdam (born 1756) designed roads using broken stones laid in symmetrical, tight patterns and covered with small stones to create a hard surface. McAdam's design, called "macadam roads," provided the greatest advancement in road construction

First motorway in Britain was the Preston bypass opened in 1958. It claimed it's first casualty 4 hours later and broke up under the weight of the traffic coupled with freeze/thaw less than one month later and had to be closed again.
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:09:59

I've just returned from an awards ceremony of a regional corridor organization, specifically a multi-modal transportation committee made up largely of DOT employees, highway contractors, civil engineers, real estate developers and a smattering of other professionals. I sat there seething while the organization did a circle-jerk rewarding the 'hard, thankless work' of putting up elevated tollways as fast as possible to 'get out in front of the projected traffic'. Professional after professional, mayor after mayor stepped forth and proudly proclaimed their allegiance to tollway building (with scant mention of high gas prices), and referred to tollway opponents as 'enemies with an agenda.' Seeing as those 'enemies' make up most of Austin, I suppose they meant to say the 'public'. The emcee lauded the public/private partnerships that get tollways out 'quicker' and concluded that without new highways, our economy would become a third-world one in no time.

I guess I'm just posting this to vent. I'm taking a rather fatalistic view towards all this highway building that's going on, when it's clear to me that it will be money wasted when gas stays above 3-4 dollars/gallon. On the bright side, there is a great deal of thought going into commuter rail right now. Hopefully, I'll get an edge in on some of the action, especially concerning urban TODs at the station-nodes.

Soooooo........... What do you think?
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby lotrfan55345 » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:13:19

It gives the public an impression that their trafic woes will somehow be solved.
lotrfan55345
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Tue 20 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Minneapolis / Pittsburgh

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby Ludi » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:18:24

Why? Because people can make a ton of money building them, that's why.

Well, that was obvious....

But yeah, it stinks on toast. :x
Ludi
 

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:20:19

I know that most of the griping about tollways here have to do with the fact that tolls were to be implemented on existing roadways using RFID tags embedded on license plates. You simply won't win approval of tolling existing roads from the public. My beef is that we're spending any money at all on suburban elevated freeway decks, assuming that they are going to solve traffic snarls.

Favorite feature of the night: DVD about the history of the Eisenhower Interstate System & Texas' influence on/from it. Circle jerk central!
'So prophetic, so visionary...'

:roll:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:25:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Ludi', 'W')hy? Because people can make a ton of money building them, that's why.

Well, that was obvious....

But yeah, it stinks on toast. :x


Yeah, to the tune of a $284 billion highway bill. :evil:

Assuming that the higher-ups in government can sense PO and yet wish to not 'alarm' the public, why would it allow such excess and corruption to be signed into that bill? I know, I know, what else would I expect?

It's just.....frustrating. :cry:
"It's called the American Dream because you'd have to be asleep to believe it."

George Carlin
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby rogerhb » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:35:40

You will need somewhere to park all those cars when you rip up the drives and city streets in the forelorn hope of growing some potatoes.
"Complex problems have simple, easy to understand, wrong answers." - Henry Louis Mencken
User avatar
rogerhb
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 4727
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Smalltown New Zealand

Re: Why are we still building highways?

Unread postby seldom_seen » Thu 29 Sep 2005, 21:40:13

The auto/highway/road buidling juggernaut is in overshoot right now.

It's as if they've driven off a cliff but their forward momentum is so strong that they haven't started to feel the pull of gravity or notice that there's no ground under their feet anymore.

Once they hit the ground I since that it will be shocking and unexpected.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest