Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Global Economy (merged)

Discussions about the economic and financial ramifications of PEAK OIL

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 10:27:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Doly', 'W')TF does "the global economy has peaked" mean?

I understand that oil production can peak, but what kind of economic measurement is peaking when they say something like that?


I can't and I won't put words in their mouth, but what I assume they mean is that world economic growth in 2004 was 5.1%, and that recently they have downgraded the growth forecast to 4.3% in both 2005 & 2006.

In simplest terms, the population is expanding, say in China as an example, they need 8% growth per year just to absorb the number of people reaching the working age and migrating from farms to the city. If they fall short of 8% growth they have a serious dilemna as the social safeety net is essentially zero. Popular unrest maybe even revolution. The Chinese economy has been growing at 9-9.5% so any less would be hard as expectations have been raised.

So if world growth slows due to high energy prices, either more people live in poverty or less people climb out of poverty. Certainly world growth in the magnitude of 1.2% per year as expected in W. Europe, which feels slow, would be a disaster for the developing world who's population is expanding much quicker.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby Kez » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 11:11:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '3'). People work with the system because they believe one of the following:

i. they have no option
ii. they are working towards a better tomorrow.

So how can all have a better tomorrow, be more wealthy, if we live on a finite planet? Or is the goal to delude enough of the people so that they don't revolt?


I think you're missing some things. Some people work because they enjoy working. Some people work just to make a difference in other people's lives. Some people set themselves up with a very expensive lifestyle, and are stuck working because of their own materialistic choices. Some people have no option, simply because they made horrible decisions that are 100% their own fault, and now must pay alimony, child support, or some other set of bills and therefore must
stay in the system. Others have no option because of no fault of their own, like a car accident or death in the family.

Conversely, have you thought about why people don't work with the system and just fight it constantly?

a. They're lazy
b. They don't understand how the system works, so they fail constantly - they don't understand credit cards, or saving money, or managing their money
c. They think that they are entitled to things they didn't earn
d. They don't like to work and don't want to spend the time and money getting an education
e. They work hard but never seem to get anywhere, so they give up
f. They have been screwed over by people and corporations and feel that they will be screwed again by the system. For example, working for a long time somewhere expecting a decent retirement or benefits, only to get nothing.

In my experience, there are a lot more lazy, ignorant, and just plain materialistic people than there are people who have been screwed over unjustly. Any system, no matter what you call it, which rewards those who can work but choose not to, and punishes those who do work, is not just.
Kez
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 218
Joined: Fri 06 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: North Texas

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby falser » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 11:15:41

The article is dead on. Liquidity contraction is indeed probably the biggest problem facing the US economy, it cannot go on forever. Once the easy money (free debt) disappears there will inevitably be some hard times for anybody that owes money, or lends money. Banks won't have increasing cashflow, average income people won't be able to afford million dollar homes, no more big screen TV's, no more 0% financed SUV's.
User avatar
falser
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 308
Joined: Fri 12 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 12:18:53

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('falser', 'T')he article is dead on. Liquidity contraction is indeed probably the biggest problem facing the US economy, it cannot go on forever. Once the easy money (free debt) disappears there will inevitably be some hard times for anybody that owes money, or lends money. Banks won't have increasing cashflow, average income people won't be able to afford million dollar homes, no more big screen TV's, no more 0% financed SUV's.


I think the IMF & others are more worried about the cheap money policy exported to the rest of the world. Easy money has not only buoyed housing prices while keeping long term rates low, but has been a shot of adrenillin for the world economy. Either countries have issued debt in USD carrying a low coupon or in search of yield money managers have bid up the price of debt in local currencies, in essense taking on more risk for less premium. Rising rates reverses that dynamic. It goes beyond the US consumer, but it starts with cheap money Made in the USA.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby threadbear » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 12:47:58

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Kez', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rogerhb', '3'). People work with the system because they believe one of the following:

i. they have no option
ii. they are working towards a better tomorrow.

So how can all have a better tomorrow, be more wealthy, if we live on a finite planet? Or is the goal to delude enough of the people so that they don't revolt?


I think you're missing some things. Some people work because they enjoy working. Some people work just to make a difference in other people's lives. Some people set themselves up with a very expensive lifestyle, and are stuck working because of their own materialistic choices. Some people have no option, simply because they made horrible decisions that are 100% their own fault, and now must pay alimony, child support, or some other set of bills and therefore must
stay in the system. Others have no option because of no fault of their own, like a car accident or death in the family.

Conversely, have you thought about why people don't work with the system and just fight it constantly?

a. They're lazy
b. They don't understand how the system works, so they fail constantly - they don't understand credit cards, or saving money, or managing their money
c. They think that they are entitled to things they didn't earn
d. They don't like to work and don't want to spend the time and money getting an education
e. They work hard but never seem to get anywhere, so they give up
f. They have been screwed over by people and corporations and feel that they will be screwed again by the system. For example, working for a long time somewhere expecting a decent retirement or benefits, only to get nothing.

In my experience, there are a lot more lazy, ignorant, and just plain materialistic people than there are people who have been screwed over unjustly. Any system, no matter what you call it, which rewards those who can work but choose not to, and punishes those who do work, is not just.


You're crazy if you think people are "rewarded" for not working. Let's give this idea a decent burial, shall we? If you really think this, you simply don't know anyone who is out of work, long term. I don't mean recently laid off tech employees, who's best strategy is to wait and see, rather than take to the cornfields, either.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby cheRand » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 13:54:20

Or maybe people mostly learn about the world around them from the cues that they get from other people and from TV. T

hey try to do their best at meeting their needs, but failures such as personal debt are pretty much isolated to a handful in their realm of intake at a time, mostly.

When others around them are successful, they have encouragement to plug along. But when a lot of people in close proximity are dissatisfied at the same time, it creates "hot spots" of dissatisfaction that can spread to other people also at the tipping point.

There are some patterns like this in other things: Viral marketing on the internet; disease epidemics; street riots; fads; political transformation.

But regardless of human character and motivation... (back to topic)...

The research coming out of the Institute for Strategic Competitiveness at Harvard Business School is encouraging local regions to find clusters of industry that are interrelated and share a competitive advantage based on location. They don't talk about peak oil, but do talk about availability of the "pieces" needed within an industry. So I'm guessing that smart corporations will begin to marshal in the components of their processes into regional areas. Another group, IMPLAN, says labor is usually the decisive cost factor in production. Course, that's way overgeneralized. But the point is:
1. Find your biggest cost. Find the place you can meet it cheapeast.
2. Surround yourself with the infrastructure to do it all in that area.
3. Create a regional powerhouse.

I'm reminded of the ordering of peasant society in Mexico, where ie, the musical instruments are from informal artisans in Michoacan, the pottery from Oaxaca, the fiber arts from Chiapas... and they all went to market in Market centers. Only today, market centers are not needed. These are just distribution functions. I think prices will reflect transkportation from the complex production center.... and that small local companies will get in under the transportation cost niche.
User avatar
cheRand
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Mon 29 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Oklahoma

Re: Good bye and good riddance to globalisation

Postby threadbear » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 16:28:44

Cherand, Interesting post. I'm looking forward to hearing from you more often.
User avatar
threadbear
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7577
Joined: Sat 22 Jan 2005, 04:00:00

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby SHiFTY » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 16:53:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')erard Lyons, chief economist at Standard Chartered, said the global economic cycle had peaked, pointing to rising interest rates, the potential for slower growth in the US and China and the fact that the Japanese and eurozone economies were not in a position to take up the slack.

"The next six months will be a challenging time, dealing with the high oil price, and global imbalances loom. The global economy has peaked and liquidity conditions are set to tighten. When things turn around you can have significant fallout."


The interesting thing about recession is that governments can usually borrow and spend to stimulate the economy. However the US has been maxed out on its credit card for some years now; and is unlikely to be able to finance any stimulatory expenditure. In fact it will probably be forced by creditor nations to do the opposite, cut spending and raise taxes in an attempt to balance the budget.

That didn't work very well in the 1930s.
User avatar
SHiFTY
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 163
Joined: Mon 27 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby Barbara » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 17:20:47

From a journalist point of view, it looks very funny how they used the word "peak" (economy).
I'd expect it from a peakoiler, seeing peaks here and there, but how this word came to mind of those flat earth economists?
I bet there's a lot of "peak" talks behind the FT curtain... they are getting used to the word without using it in their oil articles.
**no english mothertongue**
--------
Objects in the rear view mirror
are closer than they appear.
Barbara
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1121
Joined: Wed 26 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Zoorope

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby khebab » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 17:24:50

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('falser', 'T')he article is dead on. Liquidity contraction is indeed probably the biggest problem facing the US economy, it cannot go on forever. Once the easy money (free debt) disappears there will inevitably be some hard times for anybody that owes money, or lends money. Banks won't have increasing cashflow, average income people won't be able to afford million dollar homes, no more big screen TV's, no more 0% financed SUV's.


I think the IMF & others are more worried about the cheap money policy exported to the rest of the world. Easy money has not only buoyed housing prices while keeping long term rates low, but has been a shot of adrenillin for the world economy. Either countries have issued debt in USD carrying a low coupon or in search of yield money managers have bid up the price of debt in local currencies, in essense taking on more risk for less premium. Rising rates reverses that dynamic. It goes beyond the US consumer, but it starts with cheap money Made in the USA.

You're right, there are basically two ways to influence economic growth:
- interest rates (cost of money);
- oil prices (cost of energy);
Low rates have allowed cheap money to inflate the housing bubble but rising energy could jeopardize the economic growth and burst the bubble.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby GoIllini » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 17:27:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('SHiFTY', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'G')erard Lyons, chief economist at Standard Chartered, said the global economic cycle had peaked, pointing to rising interest rates, the potential for slower growth in the US and China and the fact that the Japanese and eurozone economies were not in a position to take up the slack.

"The next six months will be a challenging time, dealing with the high oil price, and global imbalances loom. The global economy has peaked and liquidity conditions are set to tighten. When things turn around you can have significant fallout."


The interesting thing about recession is that governments can usually borrow and spend to stimulate the economy. However the US has been maxed out on its credit card for some years now; and is unlikely to be able to finance any stimulatory expenditure. In fact it will probably be forced by creditor nations to do the opposite, cut spending and raise taxes in an attempt to balance the budget.

That didn't work very well in the 1930s.


We'll just print more money and restart our economy. Hundreds of nations have done it, and North America has the natural resources to have a healthy economy, peak oil or not.
User avatar
GoIllini
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby lowem » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 19:11:59

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', 'W')e'll just print more money and restart our economy. Hundreds of nations have done it.


I'd suppose that list includes Germany, Argentina and more recently, Zimbabwe.

Yeah, all countries print money, but some countries run into this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation
Live quotes - oil/gold/silver
User avatar
lowem
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1901
Joined: Mon 19 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Singapore
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby GoIllini » Mon 26 Sep 2005, 20:00:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lowem', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('GoIllini', 'W')e'll just print more money and restart our economy. Hundreds of nations have done it.


I'd suppose that list includes Germany, Argentina and more recently, Zimbabwe.

Yeah, all countries print money, but some countries run into this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation


Exactly. Hyperinflation really isn't all that bad, long-term. If Hitler had died in 1938, Germany would have come out of its recession in better shape than it could have ever hoped it would in 1920.

When an educated, industrialized country with plenty of natural resources experiences hyper-inflation, it can make out well.
User avatar
GoIllini
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 04:03:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he interesting thing about recession is that governments can usually borrow and spend to stimulate the economy. However the US has been maxed out on its credit card for some years now; and is unlikely to be able to finance any stimulatory expenditure.


If only, it appears that America will try to borrow the full costs of its disasterous energy & highway bills, the war in Iraq and the cost of rebuilding in the wake of katerina and rita, plus anything else that comes up, without raising taxes or cutting expenditures elsewhere.

I think this is what they mean about the straw that broke the camels back? :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 04:12:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'E')xactly. Hyperinflation really isn't all that bad, long-term. If Hitler had died in 1938, Germany would have come out of its recession in better shape than it could have ever hoped it would in 1920.

When an educated, industrialized country with plenty of natural resources experiences hyper-inflation, it can make out well.


This is wrong from a historical perspective and an economic one, but I just don't know where to start? I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion?

But, as someone else said, Argentina is not richer for their hyperinflation and numerous debt defaults. Zimbabwe is not richer for its mishandling of the economy. Inflation leads to inflation not prosperity. And, the Weimar Republic was bankrupted by the onerous penalties heaped upon it by France and her allies at Versailles. I always maintain that WWII started with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles. :!:
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby GoIllini » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 11:39:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MrBill', 'T')his is wrong from a historical perspective and an economic one, but I just don't know where to start? I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion?

But, as someone else said, Argentina is not richer for their hyperinflation and numerous debt defaults. Zimbabwe is not richer for its mishandling of the economy. Inflation leads to inflation not prosperity.

And Zimbabwe isn't poorer, either. A country's long term economic success is the product of its natural resources and technical expertise. Zimbabwe and Argentina just don't have what the U.S. has. Heck, Germany didn't have what the the U.S. has, and it did very well.

Whether or not hyperinflation leads to prosperity, we can count on any kind of economic mess getting cleaned up after a decade. Peak oil might put us in a 1800s economy for a while, but I really don't think it's the frightening scenario most people make it out to be.

Countries that have natural resources and people with high school educations always recover. I'm a little worried mid-term, but I realize that in 25 years, we'll be on the exact same footing as every other industrialized nation.
User avatar
GoIllini
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 765
Joined: Sat 05 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby linlithgowoil » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 17:53:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I') always maintain that WWII started with the signing of the Treaty of Versailles.


Come on man, so do most respected historians! I'm pretty sure it wasn't you that came up with that point. :-D Sorry if I'm offending you here!

I am interested in the global economic situation though - but from what i understand, people expect 2005-6 to be slower, but then for growth to accelerate again thereafter. Im not sure why they are saying this - maybe they are expecting a return to $30 oil perhaps? No idea.

I think we're in trouble though. The UK is pretty much at full employment right now and even so, the UK people are having to borrow just to live day to day. What will happen when unemployment creeps up? Not good really. I certainly cant see the UK in particular experiencing an upturn in its economy - we've just had 10 years of uninterrupted growth, the longest period ever known and this period had high employment, low energy prices and moderate taxation. Now, we have high employment, high energy prices and higher taxation, with taxes set to go higher still. Also - housing costs are astronomical now.

The disgusting thing is, as well, that the 'right to buy' policy in the UK has brought about the housing problem. In case anyone doesnt know, if you have a rented house from the local council (government), you get a massive discount on the market value of the house if you buy it. So - a neighbour of mine bought their £90,000 house for £11,000 last year. Effectively, they've just received around £80,000 from the goverment tax free for no particular reason, plus their house is now taken off the housing provision for poorer families.

the UK is shite.
User avatar
linlithgowoil
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Mon 20 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Scotland
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 18:42:10

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')ome on man, so do most respected historians! I'm pretty sure it wasn't you that came up with that point. Sorry if I'm offending you here!


I am not offended :)

However, that is my own opinion having read many others. I like to come up with my own opinions after having considered many points of view and not just regurgitate someone else's point of view.

In any case, I think my point was that reparations imposed on the Weimar Republic were the cause of hyperinflation and collapse of the economy and not mismanagement of the economy and a build up of excesses which is the usual cause of hyperinflation. In other words the hyperinflation and collapse were imposed externally and were not symptoms of over spending or over investment in capacity. And the rest as we say is history.
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby Vexed » Tue 27 Sep 2005, 19:11:51

From the FT article
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..and liquidity conditions are set to tighten.


Cash will be king.

The bubbles will pop.

As homeprices are reigned in, consumers will begin to feel the bite of energy prices. The 3-story McMansion, on its postage stamp lot, will seem impossible to keep warm. The SUV, bought for such a bargain (at employee price), will begin to seem like an extra mouth to feed as it drains away spare cash. Minimum payments on credit cards will continue to grow. A sense of entitlement, along with a violent desire to deny reality, will in turn foster a complete lack of preparation, which will be the disaster of many.

The retail environment will get ugly as consumer spending drys up. Confidence will drop like a brick. The markets will wither. Unemployment will soar. There will be panic.

The correction could take some time.
User avatar
Vexed
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri 13 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: FT article: Global Economy has peaked.

Postby MrBill » Wed 28 Sep 2005, 06:54:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Vexed', 'F')rom the FT article
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '.')..and liquidity conditions are set to tighten.


Cash will be king.

The bubbles will pop.

As homeprices are reigned in, consumers will begin to feel the bite of energy prices. The 3-story McMansion, on its postage stamp lot, will seem impossible to keep warm. The SUV, bought for such a bargain (at employee price), will begin to seem like an extra mouth to feed as it drains away spare cash. Minimum payments on credit cards will continue to grow. A sense of entitlement, along with a violent desire to deny reality, will in turn foster a complete lack of preparation, which will be the disaster of many.

The retail environment will get ugly as consumer spending drys up. Confidence will drop like a brick. The markets will wither. Unemployment will soar. There will be panic.

The correction could take some time.


Even if I agree with you Vexed, it just illustrates another point that I notice about these threads. The article in question is talking about the world economy, but your examples of the aftermath are very US-centric. So, even post-peak oil, even after the collapse of the dollar, etc. the debate is all about the good ol' USA. Quite illuminating really. :)
The organized state is a wonderful invention whereby everyone can live at someone else's expense.
User avatar
MrBill
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5630
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Eurasia
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Economics & Finance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron