Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Human Nature Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby daniel347 » Fri 02 Sep 2005, 23:40:21

I agree with what you say about evolution and "human nature" Matt, although not in all the details of it. Although this is just my perspective on it, I cant say I'm right.

I think people at least have the ability to choose.

We live in a time when there is more information available and more suffering than at any other time in history. Peak oil is not neccessarily just about survival, but making a choice to how you view the world.

Perhaps we have evolved not to act in a predetermined way, but to think and to seek happiness?

Self identity is not always limited to your own genes. I choose to make my happiness more important than anything else, even at the risk that I might be one of the ones who dont survive. What can you do except try to be happy?

Now this does not mean, that I can only be happy when I have more material wealth than everybody else. Being happy is not selfish. People can be happy with surprisingly little. What does it matter if you dont have houses and cars and aeroplanes and guns if, if you have a healthy, enjoyable lifestyle and good friends?

If you need an evolutionary reason, it makes sense. I think that because I have chosen to be compassionate and oriented towards happiness, that I am more productive than I would be otherwise. I achieve more, I have more friends, I feel healthier, than I used to. I dont feel the need to buy things that I dont need, and I am better able to do things for people around me, than I was when I just thought that self-survival was the most important thing behind the way people think.

If being agressive and selfish to protect your own genes is the way to go, then I guess that is the answer to why we have created all the problems that we have. If there are people out there who are genetic assholes... well that would suck.

I hope my posts make sense... I dont want to appear to be just a rambling lunatic who doesn't understand :) This is the first time I have posted to this board, although I've been reading it occasionally for while now. BTW Matt your website introduced me to peak oil, so thanks :)
User avatar
daniel347
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Sat 13 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby MattSavinar » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:29:47

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('daniel347', 'I') agree with what you say about evolution and "human nature" Matt, although not in all the details of it. Although this is just my perspective on it, I cant say I'm right.

I think people at least have the ability to choose.

We live in a time when there is more information available and more suffering than at any other time in history. Peak oil is not neccessarily just about survival, but making a choice to how you view the world.

I hope my posts make sense... I dont want to appear to be just a rambling lunatic who doesn't understand :) This is the first time I have posted to this board, although I've been reading it occasionally for while now. BTW Matt your website introduced me to peak oil, so thanks :)


Not thanks necessary. Just trying to increase my inclusiveness.

Matt
User avatar
MattSavinar
Elite
Elite
 
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sun 09 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby Concerned » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 08:21:08

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MattSavinar', 'H')uman nature is controlled by human genes. Human genes care about one thing: making more copies of themselves.

Thus humans will act in whatever fashion that their "genetic-subconscious" complex had perceived will best preserve their ability to make copies of themselves. The conscious mind will then rationlize the behavior as something it perceives will be accetable by the group.


I think when there is a break down of law and order anyting is possible. Hell even with law and order murders, killings, bashings, stabbings, rapes, home violence, intimidation, fraud etc.. happen.

My understanding is the vast majority of looters were for essentials like food and water. To me thats basic survival. Looting for a dvd player or TV is just plain stupid IMO and does not conform to any survival mechanism so *shrugs* on that one.

By the way if those looters should get "shot on sight* does that mean GW Bush and co should get shot on site for looting Iraq's wealth?
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')
In some cases, this means doing things you or I might consider "altruistic." In other cases, this this means doing things you or I might consider "evil." If this means accepting as true something that is obviously false, then so be it. From the genes standpoint, it doesn't mattert. Truth, justice, goodness etc. . . are not part of the genes' mission statement. Those are labels we slap on behavior after the fact depending on the group's social norms.

What about the person who sacrifices themselves to save others you ask? Well, those genes get weeded out of the pool. :cry:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')When we have an organised society people may do things they don't like including sacraficing themselves for others. E.g. military When this society begins to break down then less people are inclined to engage in this behavior and take a more indiviluistic "every man for himself" approach.

History will be the judge which direction the US is headed


It's one of the more upsetting aspects of our situation, imho.

Matt

P.S.

John Denver DOES NOT have permission to reprint what I wrote above. He will simply twist it and take it out of context.

JD: if you're reading this, don't even try it buddy.
"Once the game is over, the king and the pawn go back in the same box."
-Italian Proverb
User avatar
Concerned
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Thu 23 Sep 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby kelee877 » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 08:37:35

While on the subject..Did you see the news last night?
There was a white couple from Canada on the news and they where stuck in a hotel with 30 other whites..and they keep going on about how they where allowed to go across the mall to get what they needed to survive..they had received permission from a security gaurd to take what ever they needed..and they where putting down the blacks(who by the way had lost everything they owned their houses,clothing, any keep sakes)..meanwhile this Canadian couple have a nice comfy home to return to and where air lifted out ASAP...just urks me the way the media plays this out..white people took what they needed to survive..black folks are looters..
User avatar
kelee877
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun 06 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Elliot Lake, Ontario

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby JustinFrankl » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 10:31:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kelee877', 'j')ust urks me the way the media plays this out..white people took what they needed to survive..black folks are looters..

I understand there was something going around the Internet recently, about two stories allegedly released by the Associated Press.

One story has a picture of two white people in the water, hauling food, and the caption read, "Two residents wade through chest-deep water after finding bread and soda from a local grocery store in New Orleans..."

One story had a picture of a black man in the water, hauling food, and the caption read "A young man walks through chest deep flood water after looting a grocery store in New Orleans..."

I saw this on Real Time with Bill Maher. Does anyone know if these stories were really released by the AP?
JustinFrankl
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby spudbuddy » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 13:48:01

Many societies in the history of the world have gone through tough times...and not disintegrated into complete chaos.
Although it's true that nothing like PO has happened before, it disturbs me that so many leap to the conclusion that everything will immediately degenerate into mass anarchy.

For starters...we didn't plan for the future.
A big reason why is that the average citizen was not aware of many things they should have known.
This is rapidly changing...and will continue to do so.

No more than 10% of the population have the resources, know-how, finances, or will to indulge in familial or small-group survival procedures (whatever they might be.)
And whatever they actually are (unless one moves to Tierra del Fuego) I think it will be a useless exercise unless greater societal changes are put in place.

My point: that remote northern Minnesota, as isolated as it may feel now, will not be so in a total meltdown of society.
However much a reality-style survival fantasy might be a thrilling adventure, I believe we really are all in it together.

I can imagine that we will eventually shift into a more regional consciousness...that different areas of the globe will of necessity and geography clump together...European, Sotheast Asia, North American economies...and within these areas, further subdivisions (as the cost of transportation dictates what is and isn't possible.)

Part of the problem now is that we have been trained real well to think in global terms.
The New World Order that took off after the first Gulf War led us right into the corporate-sponsored globalized economy that has been systematically trashing the majority of the workers of the world, and sucking up energy resources like there's no tomorrow. (ironic - that.)

I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that it serves someone's interest out there to shift all the focus onto individiual consumers. Although en masse...they have some clout...they are small players, after all.
It is far easier to attack and blame an individual for their choice of an energy-wasteful lifestyle, but this has all been provided by a power elite that has systematically reduced choice, because it was in their best interest to do so.

People buy what's there...and move into communities provided.
Although this is easy to dimiss with a supply following demand model...consider just how powerful the propaganda machine has become.

We assume resistance to change.
Still we have no idea really, what will happenwhen what really created the problem turns on itself, and an anti-corporate backlash grows into a full exercise of public will.
User avatar
spudbuddy
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby MD » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 13:52:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JustinFrankl', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('kelee877', 'j')ust urks me the way the media plays this out..white people took what they needed to survive..black folks are looters..

I understand there was something going around the Internet recently, about two stories allegedly released by the Associated Press.

One story has a picture of two white people in the water, hauling food, and the caption read, "Two residents wade through chest-deep water after finding bread and soda from a local grocery store in New Orleans..."

One story had a picture of a black man in the water, hauling food, and the caption read "A young man walks through chest deep flood water after looting a grocery store in New Orleans..."

I saw this on Real Time with Bill Maher. Does anyone know if these stories were really released by the AP?

The pictures were posted here as well, but it looks like the thread was deleted?
It may be true, but by the worded of the alleged AP articles it appears "looting" was changed to "finding" in the one caption.
It may be a fabrication
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball
Top

Re: Human nature in a survival situation

Postby Chaparral » Sun 11 Sep 2005, 03:17:28

I have to agree with Matt and by extension, Richard Dawkins and Stephen Pinker. I'm in the middle of Los Angeles, California. The riots are a recent memory here, as is my extensive experience managing rent-controlled ghetto property. If post-Katrina N'awlins is any indication, many will have nothing but a bullet or a blade for me should TSHTF, say, after a large quake.

I've made my decision long ago, I WILL be looking out for # 1 and family. This means keeping my head down. Keeping my vegetable gardens concealed by high thorny hedges, keeping the water tank(s) hidden from view, keeping my mouth shut about guns & ammo and food stores.

I've ecology-minded friends up where the chaparral meets the oaks and Coulter pines. They are a different story. I will cooperate with them to the best of my ability-even to the point of forming a small intentional community of maybe a dozen members with adjacent houses on next-door lots. They're PO and permaculture aware.
User avatar
Chaparral
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 767
Joined: Sun 14 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dead civilization walking

A very, very good read about human nature (LOOONG)

Postby Specop_007 » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 02:08:43

Forewarning....Its long. Raph will get spun into the 1st dimension reading it all, K-Sem will be ready to pick up guns and storm the gates, Barbara will want to pass out hugs n kisses.

I've got my ammo ready and I shaved so my cheek is nice and smooth for kisses.

Aside from the length, its an EXCELLENT read. Well worth the time to get through it all.



Click

TRIBES
(Folks, there's R-rated language throughout this thing. Normally I can edit it out; this time, not so much. I may do so later, but now I want to leave it as I wrote it.)







I’m generally an optimist, and it’s been my pleasure to be able to write mostly about the good and the noble things in our lives. But the events in the Gulf – of Mexico – have brought to a head a summer and a year that has been getting progressively uglier and more painful to watch.

Who can not see the way the country has changed, not since 9/11, but before that – since the 2000 election? Who cannot feel the split, the division, that rips like a shredding sail on a broken mast, canvas tearing like the sound of musketry, as the rigging falls to the deck?

This breaks my heart. It just breaks my heart into little pieces. I have said less and less as I see more and more, because deep in my core I still don’t want to believe that some Americans could willfully and consistently do such destructive things out of such petty and base motivations, things which in time will make the horrors of New Orleans look like a flea circus in a small tent, with the much larger carnival raging unseen in the background.

I’ve taken sides in these essays, obviously – that’s what I do. But I have never, until now, felt the need to take the gloves off and really let fly. I always feared I would regret it, later. I still do. Only now, I fear I will regret it worse if I do not.

So now we must look at Tribes.







Now please pay attention to this, because I’m not going to state it again, and if you don’t hear it now much mischief will follow:

I believe that the human animal – the raw material of our physical bodies – is essentially interchangeable. By this I mean that I could take the children of Fallujah and turn them all into Astronauts, convert Jewish babies into fanatical, mass-murdering SS guards, and shake a generation of the poorest Voodoo-worshippers in Haiti into a cadre of top-flight nuclear physicists, chemical engineers and computer scientists.

Race has nothing to do with this – precisely nothing. The mobs of murdering Hutus and swarms of slaughtering Serbs are as different racially as it is possible to be, and they are cut from precisely the same cloth.

I know this is so because there have been murdering scumbags of every stripe and color in the long history of the human race – which is depressing – and that these animals, at any given time, represent only a small percentage of the majority of people, also of every stripe and color – which is not. There is no corner on virtue, and no outpost of depravity. Human hearts are indistinguishable and interchangeable. Anyone who claims otherwise is, without further argument or statements necessary, a complete God-damned idiot.

Now, with that said – have we all heard that loud and clear? – there are light-years of difference in how various Tribes will behave.

Only a few minutes ago, I had the delightful opportunity to read the comment of a fellow who said he wished that white, middle-class, racist, conservative cocksuckers like myself could have been herded into the Superdome Concentration Camp to see how much we like it. Absent, of course, was the fundamental truth of what he plainly does not have the eyes or the imagination to see, namely, that if the Superdome had been filled with white, middle-class, racist, conservative cocksuckers like myself, it would not have been a refinery of horror, but rather a citadel of hope and order and restraint and compassion.

That has nothing to do with me being white. If the blacks and Hispanics and Jews and gays that I work with and associate with were there with me, it would have been that much better. That’s because the people I associate with – my Tribe – consists not of blacks and whites and gays and Hispanics and Asians, but of individuals who do not rape, murder, or steal. My Tribe consists of people who know that sometimes bad things happen, and that these are an opportunity to show ourselves what we are made of. My people go into burning buildings. My Tribe consists of organizers and self-starters, proud and self-reliant people who do not need to be told what to do in a crisis. My Tribe is not fearless; they are something better. They are courageous. My Tribe is honorable, and decent, and kind, and inventive. My Tribe knows how to give orders, and how to follow them. My Tribe knows enough about how the world works to figure out ways to boil water, ration food, repair structures, build and maintain makeshift latrines, and care for the wounded and the dead with respect and compassion.

There are some things my Tribe is not good at at all. My Tribe doesn’t make excuses. My Tribe will analyze failure and assign blame, but that is to make sure that we do better next time, and we never, ever waste valuable energy and time doing so while people are still in danger. My Tribe says, and in their heart completely believes that it’s the other guy that’s the hero. My Tribe does not believe that a single Man can cause, prevent or steer Hurricanes, and my Tribe does not and has never made someone else responsible for their own safety, and that of their loved ones.

My Tribe doesn’t fire on people risking their lives, coming to help us. My Tribe doesn’t curse such people because they arrived on Day Four, when we felt they should have been here before breakfast on Day One. We are grateful, not to say indebted, that they have come at all. My Tribe can’t eat Nike’s and we don’t know how to feed seven by boiling a wide-screen TV. My Tribe doesn’t give a sweet God Damn about what color the looters are, or what color the rescuers are, because we can plainly see before our very eyes that both those Tribes have colors enough to cover everyone in glory or in shame. My Tribe doesn’t see black and white skins. My Tribe only sees black and white hats, and the hat we choose to wear is the most personal decision we can make.

That’s the other thing, too – the most important thing. My Tribe thinks that while you are born into a Tribe, you do not have to stay there. Good people can join bad Tribes, and bad people can choose good ones. My Tribe thinks you choose your Tribe. That, more than anything, is what makes my Tribe unique.

I am so utterly and unabashedly proud of my Tribe, that my words haunt and mock me for their pale weakness and shameful inadequacy.







Membership in my Tribe is not free.

I have been the first person at four accident scenes. I have crawled into overturned cars on country roads, cars whose wheels were still spinning, and gone on hands and knees through broken glass to comfort strangers while uniformed policemen stood around outside and told jokes. I have put my triple-knit polyester chauffeur’s blazer over an elderly black woman hit by a bus and used my belt as a tourniquet to slow the dark spread of blood widening beneath her badly broken leg, and been amazed, every time, at how the sounds of approaching sirens seems to come almost before I have time to hold her hand and tell her she’s gonna be just fine.

I say this not to glorify myself – on the contrary. I am embarrassed to write such things. I am a pampered and lazy Hollywood TV editor who gets paid insane sums of money to do a cake job while much better people than me do this every day, for peanuts. There is nothing remotely heroic about me. I simply do what millions and millions and millions of my fellow Americans do every day, in ways large and small. They step up to the plate, not because they want to be heroes, but because someone has to do it. These simple people donate their time, their money, their food, their cars and their houses every single day, and ask and expect nothing in return, while a few miles away from me in Brentwood millionaire movie stars throw fabulous parties to remind each other how swell they are, then waltz out into their chauffeured limos with their tens or hundreds of millions of dollars firmly in place, feeling good that they had the chance to really make a difference by raising awareness of whichever cause they feel will most make up for their feelings of inadequacy and guilt by showing both themselves and us just how much better people they really are.

What kind of money could Barbra and Martin and Tim and Susan and Gwenneth and George and Steven and Viggo and Linda and Harvey and Brad and Angelina and Ben and all the rest – how much could they really put together, if they actually believed what they say – not to mention the cash available to the Malodorous Michigan Manatee of Mendacity? What kind of check could they write? $500 million would be less than 10% of every outspoken celebrities' combined wealth. That money could take every poor person in LA county and put them into much nicer apartments than the one I live in. They could, at a stroke, shame the President, the Congress, and the evil NeoCon warmongers by putting every displaced person in New Orleans in a Marriott for a year. They claim this is the kind of better human they have evolved into.

Why don’t they do it?

They don’t do it because that Tribe worships the golden statue of themselves, that’s why. A church-going pharmacist in Des Moines would be ashamed of herself for giving only 10% of her modest salary. But Sean Penn can take himself, an entourage and a personal photographer – that’s three or four people in a four-person boat – and show us all how incredibly big and down-home he is by sailing off a few feet to rescue people, before the boat sinks from the incompetence of failing to put in the drainage plug. He wore a very nice white flak vest, instead of the passé orange life preserver, because getting shot at is a lot more macho looking, if a million or so times less likely, than drowning because you went out into the water with a lead vest rather than a life vest. It’s a scene in the trailer that runs incessantly in their heads: In a world run by evil corporations, a rebel who plays by his own rules starts a deadly game of cat and mouse with an all-powerful conspiracy in this searing portrait of extraordinary courage in a life under siege, starring…me!

I was actually ready to publicly commend the guy, until I heard about the personal photographer. If he wanted to help people – and that’s all – he could have paid for that boat, and a few hundred others, manned them with reasonably competent recreational boaters, and sent out a flotilla. But no. It’s not about having people saved. It’s about something else entirely. It’s about having people saved by Sean Penn. That’s when I realized that whether it’s the Murderous Regime in Iraq, or the Murderous Regime in Iran, or the Murderous Storm in Louisiana…ultimately, it’s all about Sean Penn. Peace Be Upon Him.

But thank God we have people like him, and the rest of that vain, useless, smug, self-centered, incompetent, insecure and thoroughly broken Tribe to point out the error of our ways.

I hate those sons of bitches with all of my heart. And the fact that so much of our society has come to worship these shallow, egomaniacal dolts says a lot about where we are, and none of it is good.








Now this next point is so obvious, so simple and so self-evident that there is no way the deep thinkers of the far left will possibly be able to see it.

Let’s not talk about Black and White tribes… I know too many pathetic, hateful, racists and more decent, capable and kind people of both colors for that to make any sense at all. Do you not? Do you not know corrupt, ignorant, violent people, both black and white, to cure you of this elementary idiocy? Have you not met and talked and laughed with people who were funny, decent, upright, honest and honorable of every shade so that the very idea of racial politics should just seem like a desperate and divisive and just plain evil tactic to hold power?

If such a thing is not self-evident to you, please get off my property. Right now. I should tell you I own a gun and I know how to use it. I assure you that the pleasure I would take in shooting you would be temporary, minimal, and deeply regretted later.

Now, for the rest of you, let’s get past Republican and Democrat, Red and Blue, too. Let’s talk about these two Tribes: Pink, the color of bunny ears, and Grey, the color of a mechanical pencil lead.

I live in both worlds. In entertainment, everything is Pink, the color of Angelyne’s Stingray – it’s exciting and dynamic and glamorous. I’m also a pilot, and I know honest-to-God rocket scientists, and combat flight crews and Special Ops guys -- stone-cold Grey, all of them -- and am proud and deeply honored to call them my friends.

The Pink Tribe is all about feeling good: feeling good about yourself! Sexually, emotionally, artistically – nothing is off limits, nothing is forbidden, convention is fossilized insanity and everybody gets to do their own thing without regard to consequences, reality, or natural law. We all have our own reality – one small personal reality is called “science,” say – and we Make Our Own Luck and we Visualize Good Things and There Are No Coincidences and Everything Happens for a Reason and You Can Be Whatever You Want to Be and we all have Special Psychic Powers and if something Bad should happen it’s because Someone Bad Made It Happen. A Spell, perhaps.

The Pink Tribe motto, in fact, is the ultimate Zen Koan, the sound of one hand clapping: EVERYBODY IS SPECIAL.

Then, in the other corner, there is the Grey Tribe – the grey of reinforced concrete. This is a Tribe where emotion is repressed because Emotion Clouds Judgment. This is the world of Quadratic Equations and Stress Risers and Loads Torsional, Compressive and Tensile, a place where Reality Can Ruin Your Best Day, the place where Murphy mercilessly picks off the Weak and the Incompetent, where the Speed Limit is 186,282.36 miles per second, where every bridge has a Failure Load and levees come in 50 year, 100 year and 1000 Year Flood Flavors.

The Grey Tribe motto is, near as I can tell, THINGS BREAK SOMETIMES AND PLEASE DON’T LET IT BE MY BRIDGE.

Now, let’s do a little free associating, just to take the model for a test spin:

I’m going to throw out some names, and you tell me whether you think they are Pink or Grey? Okay? Ready?

Donald Rumsfield.
Al Sharpton.
Bill Clinton.
Ted Kennedy.
George W. Bush.
Condoleeza Rice.

Okay, my score is Grey, Pink, Pink, Pink, Grey and Grey. Easy, right? Dems = Pink, Repubs = Grey. Now how about these?

John Kennedy
Abraham Lincoln
Ronald Reagan
Franklin Roosevelt

These are more interesting, because there is something very Pink, something warm and emotional and comforting about them. Put all four of them at a dinner table (which I would trade the rest of my life to serve ice water for) and I think you would see four warm, gentle, bright and genuinely funny men.

Now, think:

Cuban Missile Crisis
Fredericksburg
Reykjavik
Pearl Harbor

I get solid Grey scores here. What about you? I get tough, hard-nosed, capable, competent, confident men facing evil straight in the eye and not backing down. (And anyone who even thinks about selling short Reykjavik as a symbol for those eight years of steadfast resolution should see my gun warning, above).

Also, I see two Democrats and two Republicans. Opposing parties. Same Tribe.

Now, when things are going swimmingly, when the End of History has arrived, as it did in the 90’s, having a Pink president (careful!) is no big deal. In fact, it’s a downright advantage. He can be a goodwill ambassador, and charm the pants (you heard me!) off of foreign dignitaries and have everyone cooing and gushing about how swell Americans are once the fascists are out of power.

Now, unfortunately for Pink Power, there remain in the world a few people not impressed by this attitude.

Not long ago, National Geographic ran a really first-rate, 4-hour documentary called INSIDE 9/11, as perfect an example as you could possibly want of the power of a real documentary to enlighten and inform without taking sides.

Watching it was horrible, especially for people like me, because we feel like if we had only known what was going on we could have done something about it.

A few weeks ago, a reader was kind enough to send me a link about a theory and seminar called The Bulletproof Mind, written by Lt. Colonel Dave Grossman. Just the small blurb I read enlarged my mental horizon by an order of magnitude, because it clarified many of the confusing things I have been feeling as so much of the country plunges deeper into irresponsibility, fantasy, bitterness and delusion.

I excerpt a small portion of it here, without permission, in the hope that those of you who are serious about surviving things like Katrina will go here and buy it.

Lt. Colonel Grossman, a far better man than me, a man who does things I only talk about, writes in his introduction to The Bulletproof Mind:

One Vietnam veteran, an old retired colonel, once said this to me: "Most of the people in our society are sheep. They are kind, gentle, productive creatures who can only hurt one another by accident."

This is true. Remember, the murder rate is six per 100,000 per year, and the aggravated assault rate is four per 1,000 per year. What this means is that the vast majority of Americans are not inclined to hurt one another.

Some estimates say that two million Americans are victims of violent crimes every year, a tragic, staggering number, perhaps an all-time record rate of violent crime. But there are almost 300 million total Americans, which means that the odds of being a victim of violent crime is considerably less than one in a hundred on any given year. Furthermore, since many violent crimes are committed by repeat offenders, the actual number of violent citizens is considerably less than two million.

Thus there is a paradox, and we must grasp both ends of the situation: We may well be in the most violent times in history, but violence is still remarkably rare. This is because most citizens are kind, decent people who are not capable of hurting each other, except by accident or under extreme provocation. They are sheep.

I mean nothing negative by calling them sheep. To me it is like the pretty, blue robin's egg. Inside it is soft and gooey but someday it will grow into something wonderful. But the egg cannot survive without its hard blue shell. Police officers, soldiers and other warriors are like that shell, and someday the civilization they protect will grow into something wonderful. For now, though, they need warriors to protect them from the predators.

"Then there are the wolves," the old war veteran said, "and the wolves feed on the sheep without mercy." Do you believe there are wolves out there who will feed on the flock without mercy? You better believe it. There are evil men in this world and they are capable of evil deeds. The moment you forget that or pretend it is not so, you become a sheep. There is no safety in denial.

"Then there are sheepdogs," he went on, "and I'm a sheepdog. I live to protect the flock and confront the wolf." Or, as a sign in one California law enforcement agency put it, "We intimidate those who intimidate others."

If you have no capacity for violence then you are a healthy productive citizen: a sheep. If you have a capacity for violence and no empathy for your fellow citizens, then you have defined an aggressive sociopath--a wolf. But what if you have a capacity for violence, and a deep love for your fellow citizens? Then you are a sheepdog, a warrior, someone who is walking the hero's path. Someone who can walk into the heart of darkness, into the universal human phobia, and walk out unscathed.

He continues:

Let me expand on this old soldier's excellent model of the sheep, wolves, and sheepdogs. We know that the sheep live in denial; that is what makes them sheep. They do not want to believe that there is evil in the world. They can accept the fact that fires can happen, which is why they want fire extinguishers, fire sprinklers, fire alarms and fire exits throughout their kids' schools. But many of them are outraged at the idea of putting an armed police officer in their kid's school. Our children are dozens of times more likely to be killed, and thousands of times more likely to be seriously injured, by school violence than by school fires, but the sheep's only response to the possibility of violence is denial. The idea of someone coming to kill or harm their children is just too hard, so they choose the path of denial.

The sheep generally do not like the sheepdog. He looks a lot like the wolf. He has fangs and the capacity for violence. The difference, though, is that the sheepdog must not, cannot and will not ever harm the sheep. Any sheepdog that intentionally harms the lowliest little lamb will be punished and removed. The world cannot work any other way, at least not in a representative democracy or a republic such as ours.

Still, the sheepdog disturbs the sheep. He is a constant reminder that there are wolves in the land. They would prefer that he didn't tell them where to go, or give them traffic tickets, or stand at the ready in our airports in camouflage fatigues holding an M-16. The sheep would much rather have the sheepdog cash in his fangs, spray paint himself white, and go, "Baa." Until the wolf shows up. Then the entire flock tries desperately to hide behind one lonely sheepdog. As Kipling said in his poem about "Tommy" the British soldier:

While it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that,
an' "Tommy, fall be'ind,"
But it's "Please to walk in front, sir,"
when there's trouble in the wind,
There's trouble in the wind, my boys,
there's trouble in the wind,
O it's "Please to walk in front, sir,"
when there's trouble in the wind.

Understand that there is nothing morally superior about being a sheepdog; it is just what you choose to be. Also understand that a sheepdog is a funny critter: He is always sniffing around out on the perimeter, checking the breeze, barking at things that go bump in the night, and yearning for a righteous battle. That is, the young sheepdogs yearn for a righteous battle. The old sheepdogs are a little older and wiser, but they move to the sound of the guns when needed right along with the young ones.

Here is how the sheep and the sheepdog think differently. The sheep pretend the wolf will never come, but the sheepdog lives for that day. After the attacks on September 11, 2001, most of the sheep, that is, most citizens in America said, "Thank God I wasn't on one of those planes." The sheepdogs, the warriors, said, "Dear God, I wish I could have been on one of those planes. Maybe I could have made a difference." When you are truly transformed into a warrior and have truly invested yourself into warriorhood, you want to be there. You want to be able to make a difference.

While there is nothing morally superior about the sheepdog, the warrior, he does have one real advantage -- only one. He is able to survive and thrive in an environment that destroys 98 percent of the population.

[Emphasis mine – BW]

And that is how I felt watching every minute of that 4 hour documentary.

I could have done something.

If I had known, if I had only known, I could have run over that evil, sick son of a bitch Mohammed Atta in the parking lot. I could have been on one of those airplanes. They only had box cutters, for the love of God! Those seat cushions have straps on the back for floatation; they’d make excellent shields against a goddam two inch blade. Ladies, listen carefully…when I say go, you throw your shoes and cell phones and these little liquor bottles and cushions and whatever you can, just throw them right in the face of these cocksuckers and guys, when we get up there we need to kill them, fast, just break their fucking necks, just stomp on their heads until they are dead, because I know how to land a goddam airplane and…and…

Now of course, right at this moment there are people without honor or courage who read that and think this is one big jerk-off chickenhawk fantasy and on some level I guess it is. All I can tell you is that watching that show, I wished to God I had been on one of those planes, asking only that we knew what only Flight 93 knew, and that was the fate that was waiting for us if we did nothing.

Because everybody dies. Even liberals. And all I can say is that I believe in my heart that I would rather die for something bigger than myself than lead a life where nothing is more important than me. I admit freely that were I actually there I might freeze up, and wet my pants, and hide behind a stewardess, because you can never really know until you are there. But my times on the highways late at night, and with the only engine silent at 9000 feet over the South Georgia pine forests and at 400 feet climbing out of Prescott Arizona on Christmas day reassure me, a little, that perhaps I might do okay. Just as well as a common person, a common American person in a crisis – that’s all I pray for.

Much has been said regarding how much more massive an event Katrina is relative to lower Manhattan. But the fact remains that firemen went up the stairs when people were coming down, and one ordinary group of people on an ordinary flight on an ordinary day defeated the very best that the global terror network could put together. Our ladies junior varsity squad whipped the living shit out of their Super Bowl A-team over Pennsylvania that day, and they did it because for one brief shining moment enough passengers on that airplane went Grey.

And in Louisiana last week the governor cried and the mayor blamed everyone but himself, and half the country bought every single stinking Pink lie about global warming and missing National Guard units and blamed the sheepdogs while the wolves raped and pillaged and looted everything in sight.

Hundreds of New York firemen and policemen never came home, never came home, but New Orleans Police Chief P. Edwin Compass III said, of his men, “If I put you out on the street and made you get into gun battles all day with no place to urinate and no place to defecate, I don’t think you’d be too happy either… Our vehicles can’t get any gas. The water in the street is contaminated. My officers are walking around in wet shoes.”

Well, Chief, I’m sorry your men’s feet are wet, but getting their feet wet is part of their fucking job. New York’s Finest aren’t complaining about wet feet or places to pee because they died doing their jobs. They were sheepdogs.

Here is a video of New Orleans finest helping themselves at WalMart.

So, on one hand, we have a very blue city – New York – confronted, out of the clear morning of a perfect fall day, with no warning – with a terror attack, and they march toward the sounds of screams and falling bodies and die by the hundreds. One the other hand, we have New Orleans law enforcement – also blue – whining about wet shoes and helping themselves to the happy period of lawlessness that followed an event that had been expected for no less than seventy-two hours.

In New York, we had a governor who got every available resource on the ground as fast as it could get there, and in Louisiana we have a governor who...cried. Governor, your job is to not cry. Your job is to be strong. We have plenty of civilians crying. You want to cry, cry in the car on the way home like everybody else did four years ago. Crying Governors, race-baiting mayors and looting police do not a Finest Hour make.

In New Orleans we have a mayor who left some 400-500 buses sitting fueled and underwater in the Ray Nagin Memorial Motor Pool saying that evil white conservative America was selling out his people within 24 hours of the catastrophe, from a safe and dry and adequately toileted location, while four years ago we had a Mayor who ran to the site of the disaster so quickly it is a full-blown miracle he was not killed when a building collapsed literally on top of his magnificent, combed-over head.

Now, much has been made of the fact that Ray Nagin is an incompetent, race-baiting black man, and Rudy Giuliani, who was neither, is white. Also, feminists are upset that people dare attack Governor Blanco because she is incompetent, weak, indecisive, and also a woman. And no doubt there are salivating long-haired, short-cortexed idiots just waiting for this to be over so they can sail into the comments section and tell me what a racist and misogynist I am.

Well, here’s the news flash: Nagin isn’t incompetent because he’s black. He’s incompetent because he’s incompetent. Condoleeza Rice is black. Colin Powell is black. Ted Kennedy, a man well-acquainted with rising water crises is as white as they come. Kennedy is incompetent; Rice and Powell are two of the most competent people on the planet.

This is about tribes, all right: not black and white tribes, but rather a battle between the capable and the culpable.

Same holds for Governor Blanco. She’s not weak because she’s a woman, or because she’s a Democrat. Truman was a democrat. The Buck stopped there. She’s weak and indecisive because that is the individual she is. I wish history could work with variables: I’d love to see what Margaret Thatcher would have done in such a case. It would not only have been better, it would have been good. That woman was tough. She could be Grey as granite. And, for this, the Pink Tribe despises her.

Now it may come as a shock to those foreign luminaries who come to lecture us on how an American city leveled by forces roughly equivelent to a nuclear explosion reduce it to something "like a third world country."

This difference being lost on them seems to be this: in an American city there is garbage on the streets and people wander around looking for food and water, AFTER BEING LEVELED BY A CAT 5 HURRICANE, which is the storm swell of the Dec. 2004 tsunami, plus winds, extending inland not for two or three miles but for two or three HUNDRED MILES. In a third world country, people living in stacks of garbage, searching for food and water happens EVERY STINKING DAY. That is the NORM.

It may come as a bit of a shock to these worldly sophisticates, who are so quick to point out how parochial and ignorant we simple folk are, that the United States of America has local, state and federal governments! And that this is the order in which crises are dealt with!

A person of some modest education might have remembered that the worship and adulation fostered after 9/11 was for the NYPD and the FDNY. No one was buying FEMA hats after 9/11, because FEMA is essentially a mop-up agency. It's the first responders, the local governments, that will determine if a city will live or die. The State -- that means, the "governor"-- has the sole authority to mobilize the National Guard, and the governor of the state of Louisana was not only slow to do that, she turned down NG assistance from several OTHER states as well. The President does not have the authority to drop precious egg salad sandwiches from Michael Moore's missing helicopters. We do this ON PURPOSE. We limit the power of the federal government, as those of us fortunate enough to have spent time in Civics, rather than Self Esteem classes, are aware. This is so that we do not develop a central power so strong that eventually we end up with idiot inbred royals, or Presidentes for life, on the face of OUR money.

Now, if the critics on the far left are saying that George W Bush needs more power, then by all means let's amend the Constitution before Hurricane season ends. Me, I'm agin' it. I think the man has enough to do, really, besides worry about how many water bottles need to be kept in the basement of the courthouse in Alachua county, Florida and take down the names of every potential bus driver in Torrance California, not to mention the name of every first responder in every town and county in every state of the Union. I've noticed they are not shy about criticizing his performance as President. That's legitimate, because that's his job. His job is not to tell the Mayor of New Orleans which buses need to be at which corners at what times and with what drivers to pick up which people and take them to which destinations. That's the mayor's job.

It's always such a pleasure to have Germans enlighten us on the best way to move large groups of sick, downtrodden people by rail. The only motivation I can ascribe to such behavior is that same one that propels young dim boys to tear the wings off flies.







Here is the Grey philosophy I try to live by:

Sometimes, Bad Things Happen. Some things are beyond my control, beyond the control of the smartest and best people we have, even beyond the awesome, subtle and unlimited control of the simpering, sub-human village idiot from Texas.

Hurricanes come. They have come for all of human history, and more are coming. Barbarians also come to steal or destroy what they cannot make themselves, and they, like human tempests, have swept a path of destruction through civilization since before history was written on clay tablets on the banks of the Euphrates.

I am not a wolf. I have never harmed a person in my life. But I am not a sheep, either. I know these forces are out there, and wishing it were not so will not only not make them go away – it will rob me of my chance to kick their ass when they show up.

I am a sheepdog - an amateur, stand-by sheepdog. Police officers and elected officials get paid to be sheepdogs. Sheepdogs don’t cry, and they don’t complain about wet feet, and they don’t wail about conspiracies while waiting for the help that they themselves are sworn to provide.

Also, unlike so many in the ‘reality-based’ community, I do not believe in a deity. For instance, I don’t believe that a single god-king can summon storms, hypnotize entire populations and be the focus for evil in the world. Many people refer to Iraq as George Bush’s war, a charge I find shockingly unfair -- to me. I voted for him in 2004, and I support that war in earnest. In future billboards, I would like to be mentioned as having Kids Die in George Bush and Bill Whittle’s War for Oil, and I expect the new crop of MoveOn bumper stickers to say DEFEND AMERICA: STOP BUSH AND WHITTLE. I’m tired of being left out of this. George Bush did not take over the White House with a six-shooter; people voted him into office with the biggest number of votes in American history. I’m one of those people, and damn you liberal cheapskate sons of bitches, I demand my equal time.








On the subject of disasters man-made and natural, one more thing from INSIDE 9/11 rings a powerful bell with me. At the very end, as Osama makes his way out of Afghanistan and into hiding, he tells an Al Jazeera reporter his motivations for the 9/11 attack. In his own words, to the friendly folks back home, he explains that his goal was to hurt America so badly that we would have no choice but to go after him and start the world-wide jihad that would result in him becoming the new Caliph, ruling from his recently completed palace outside Kandahar. He had seen much of the Pink tribe in his formative years, seen weakness and retreat in places like Somalia. He thought he had our number but he made the mistake of having perhaps the least Pink individual in modern history in the White House. He made a worse mistake in flying his murdering deathbots into a town that looked Pink, that was painted Pink from head to toe, but whose foundation was rock-solid granite Grey.

If I had gotten my 2000 voting wish and Al Gore had been president that day, would he have been Grey enough to knock that entire regime over and carry the fight to the rest of the region? Or would he have issued Stern Warnings and Worked With Our Allies and gotten the UN to Issue a Major Ultimatum?

I don’t know.

But I do know, that there, in his own words, the wolf said why he did what he did: he wanted to provoke War with the US, and would do whatever was necessary to accomplish it. And if we had not given him this war, he would have kept striking until he got what he was looking for. Nothing about US foreign policy, no word about injustice for the Palestinians or Evil Corporations or any of that. No, he said he wanted to start a war with the US. And so he has it. And he would have done whatever he had to do to get it.

And they will strike again, and those silent, dogged sheepdogs who have succeeded so many times in the dark silent hours will miss a scent somewhere, and more people will die and that's what we can expect. Not dying of Influenza or Black Death, not being steamrollered under Nazi jackboots or watching Mongol hordes swarming towards us over the horizon as we run for the city walls. None of that. Only this.

And when they come, storms man-made and natural, what will the sheepdog/sheep ratio be? Enough?

Now, when Pink Tribesmen say that these people can be reasoned with, they are doing what sheep do: living in denial.

Because to say we are responsible for the terrorists in the world is a way to say we can control this wolf. If we believe we made him, then that means we control him. We can unmake him. Such a worldview appeals to the left, because it gives them Godlike Mental Powers. All we have to do is act differently and he will go away. It’s complete moral cowardice, of course – but it’s understandable cowardice. It’s denial, because if all the sins are ours then all we must do is repent and the wolf will go away.

But that’s not what the wolf says. The wolf is not interested in what we do. He does not spare little lambs because they rub up against his leg and make cooing sounds. The wolf wants to swallow us whole. He wants the fight. He wants the war and the conflict. And he will keep on huffing and puffing until one of three things happen: We show him our throat, for him to rip out; or we convert to Islam and become part of his Caliphate; or we head out into the forest with a shotgun and blow his fucking head off.

I made my decision by about 9:30 eastern on September 11th, 2001. I have never regretted it.

It takes courage to fight oncoming storms. Courage.

Courage isn’t free. It is taught, taught by certain tribes who have been around enough and seen enough incoming storms to know what one looks like. And I think the people of this nation, and those of New Orleans, specifically, desire and deserve some fundamental lessons in courage.

Because we are going to need it.
Last edited by Specop_007 on Tue 13 Sep 2005, 06:13:37, edited 1 time in total.
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: A very, very good read about human nature (LOOONG)

Postby UIUCstudent01 » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:07:42

He makes himself and all other standby 'sheepdogs' heroic... Standby competent actors aren't heroes - I reserve that judgement for full-time crazy-dedicated risk takers who may choose and actively do stuff in the direction they believe is right (and is generally accepted to be heroic).

But, that's just my own personal thing (I don't exactly think firefighters on 9/11 are heroic - they were doing their job. The building looked safe - they didn't know it would collapse any second. Also, dying doesn't make you a hero in my book. I know in other's it does - but not mine.)


Also, he connects this 'heroism' mostly to conservatives... and connecting exemplary democrats as sheepdog-conservatives in disguise.

Heroism is many things. But be careful when things shape your mental image of everything to one solidfied world-view where you are the pure and true hero. Heroism and its emotion are effective propaganda - some of the best propaganda produced by America and Germany made out ordinary citizens to be heroes. Just saying.

This just seems like a rehash of Bush's - we have to fight terrists over there to be safe here! But you ordinary citizen can lead a normal life without sacrifices - keep vigiliance you hero! A slight minor addition that is sort of like a bunch of anime.

He may not be on the payroll of the propaganda department of the government but he's still an effective propagandist - he paints a very simple picture of Main Hero-Actor (Of course that's you!) - Innocent, Non-violent Citizen needing protection, and EVIL-ENEMY.

Sorry for babbling on (it's late)... this piece has me thinking about propaganda/heroism and anime (has alot of 'fight to the last man and to your last strength' 'never give up' 'a true hero defends his friends and people' - things you don't see in America that much anymore... and may be in for a comeback) and the fact that there might be some future political disruptions between Japan and China.... (if the world goes to hell..)
User avatar
UIUCstudent01
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 838
Joined: Thu 10 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: A very, very good read about human nature (LOOONG)

Postby PenultimateManStanding » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 03:18:10

The guy's article argues for the right things. He is sincere and correct. To deny him is to deny what is right.
User avatar
PenultimateManStanding
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 11363
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Neither Here Nor There

Re: A very, very good read about human nature (LOOONG)

Postby I_Like_Plants » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 04:20:40

Very good article. Much like "Apollo and Dionysus" by Ayn Rand, must reading if you haven't read it. And yes, it's all about tribes, not necessarily race, although if TSHTF here, I'll have a hard time convincing the local Hispanics I'm part of their Tribe, whereas we whities all seem to be a Tribe - example, I meet a fellow whitie, an overweight gal doing her laundry as I'm doing mine, in the laundry room and we start conversing like we've known each other all our lives, when in fact we've never met. In fact I've never seen her again. Doesn't matter, we're the same tribe. This apartment complex is a veritable UN of different nationalities and races, and it's fascinating how the different tribes interact, or don't interact. Richard Dawkins would love it.

But yes, in the context of say, flooded NO, there were responsible type people both black and white, out there rescuing and working and finding the right size wrench or improvised tool to open that pipe valve to get some clean water trickling out for thirsty kids, and on the other side another tribe, also both black and I'm sure a few white, looting and terrorizing folks.

Modern society becoming, or reverting to, tribalism has been a hot subject for a decade or two, but it seems to be becoming more accepted as a fact these days.
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: A very, very good read about human nature (LOOONG)

Postby mermaid » Tue 13 Sep 2005, 05:22:08

it is looooooooooong, but you are right. Send it to Bush, if he reads it, it will be his first good action.
User avatar
mermaid
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon 12 Sep 2005, 03:00:00
Location: belgium

What is human nature?

Postby CrudeAwakening » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 18:47:15

To me, this question seems one of the most fundamental questions that we face. Whether or not you've given it much conscious thought, most people have a belief about this which informs their views on most facets of life, including the issues at stake as we pass the oil peak. It is my contention that your answer to this question will have an influence on which side of the optimist/pessimist spectrum you place yourself. It will also have an influence on other aspects of your life, such as your political and religious leanings: whether you embrace free market economics or are in favour of government intervention, whether you are atheist or theist.

Given that our beliefs about human nature have such a far-reaching influence on our expectations and belief systems, an understanding of human nature would seem to be extremely valuable. And yet, despite centuries of scientific advance, there is still a highly politicised debate surrounding the question of "what makes us tick". The issue of "who we are" is guaranteed to polarise discussion and alienate people from one another.

At one extreme, there are the reductionist followers of genetic determinism, who claim that our behaviour can best be explained by appeal to our genes, which act "behind the scenes" to direct our behaviour, in ways that may bypass our conscious awareness. Here, human nature is seen as unchanging over shorter time scales.

At the other extreme are the postmodern relativists, who claim that there is no such thing as human nature; instead, what we see as human nature is a culturally derived meme which is both highly variable, and malleable. They often see the concept of human nature as a politically divisive tool with which various pernicious activities may be "justified". Instead, we are "blank slates", on which our cultures write, but to which our biology has no authorial input.

A belief in the malleability of human nature would appear to provide grounds for optimism regarding the future of humanity. We simply need to learn to become more "enlightened"; social benefits will inextricably follow.

On the other hand, if human nature is unchanging (at least over our lifetimes), and we acknowledge that much our activity stems from the primal urgings of our genes to seek status, reproduce, and to care only for those in our "tribe", then it's not too hard to see how the doors to a pessimistic outlook are flung open.

My personal belief is that we have both a fundamental "biological (or animal) nature", and an overlying veneer, or "social nature". The former, I believe, is constant, while the latter is adaptable. I see our biological nature as driving the various manifestations of our social nature, while (short of genetic engineering), our social natures have no effect on our biological natures. And in many ways, our "social natures" shield us from the worst effects of our "biological natures" - and thus, should society break down, things have the potential to get pretty ugly.

So, with that preamble out of the way, over to you. What do you think? How do you think your beliefs regarding human nature influence your reaction to PO? Do you see the question as having any scientific merit, or do you think it is purely ideological? How can we understand our world if we can't understand ourselves?
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: What is human nature?

Postby americandream » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 19:03:09

You read any Hegel?
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: What is human nature?

Postby CrudeAwakening » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 19:09:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'Y')ou read any Hegel?

I tend to distrust any viewpoint that has a teleological theme. It's interesting, but ultimately I don't see any lasting truth there.
User avatar
CrudeAwakening
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 834
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What is human nature?

Postby Ayame » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 19:10:53

Darwin once said (apparently) that if we were a species where two foetuses developed side by side in the womb and the smallest was killed by it's sibling as a natural course (developed through evolution) we would find a way to justify it socially as morally proper.

I tend to agree.
Ayame
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu 29 Jun 2006, 03:00:00
Location: UK

Re: What is human nature?

Postby americandream » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 19:33:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('CrudeAwakening', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('americandream', 'Y')ou read any Hegel?

I tend to distrust any viewpoint that has a teleological theme. It's interesting, but ultimately I don't see any lasting truth there.


There is no lasting truth as such...only the interplay of opposites...whatever that might be.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Re: What is human nature?

Postby coyote » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 23:26:31

Both have a heavy influence, especially the social; but both are all too often used as an excuse for poor behavior. 'Society made me do it' or 'It's in his genes.' Our behavior is influenced by both but dictated by neither. We have freewill. We have the ability to choose our course. That's what gives me alternating bouts of hope and depression.

What did Mortimer and Randolph decide?
Lord, here comes the flood
We'll say goodbye to flesh and blood
If again the seas are silent in any still alive
It'll be those who gave their island to survive...
User avatar
coyote
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 1979
Joined: Sun 23 Oct 2005, 03:00:00
Location: East of Eden

Re: What is human nature?

Postby mmasters » Sat 05 Aug 2006, 23:39:07

I too see it as we're all preprogrammed to follow an ideal path. We are set to furfill a preprogrammed mission in life and it's how we interact with and respond to the outside world that makes all the difference. Ultimately you can't control anything 100% but yourself. Take for instance you bring up PO to your friends and constantly get into arguements with them, they stop hanging out with you as much. You notice a pattern and think, "hey, every time I try and help someone from what's coming it goes bad" well a bell should be chiming there too cause there's a pattern, and it doesn't have to continue. You have the control not to get into any more of these situations. Though many people will just take the stance the friends have the problem not them. The same situation will happen over and over and they will continually blame the other person for the result. The thing is when you take it upon yourself completely for what happens, taking full responsibility for the situation, the pattern breaks. Very empowering concept.

Continuing on with PO, the thing to understand is it will be survival of the fittest, but there's a different way to look at it. People have adapted to a life based around cheap energy for so long it has become an assumption that this way of life will continue, this has been built into people's paradigms. Their thoughts and beliefs they have concerning every day life are long surviving and fit. But. That's all in their heads. If the survival of the fittest in terms of thoughts and beliefs don't correspond with reality, they are seriously likely to run into trouble at some point. This is also why you will get very harsh reactions from unaware people when bringing up PO. You are providing a direct threat to one's worldview which they base their survival on and people will either respond in a fight or flight manner. They will either end the conversation and go away, or they will fight it in some way, whether it be denial, attacking your character, discussing alternative energies, and so forth... Also, when we deal with threats, the severity of theat reaction in general corresponds to our needs. Our basic and core needs of survival threatened will generate the biggest reaction. Spreading the word about PO will stir snakes like nothing else.

This is where we get to different types of people. People by nature fall into different catagories. Some are inward focused, some outward, others intuitive, others in the moment. Some people crave substance, deep thinking. Others crave superficiality, material possessions. Yet for some it's all about spirituality and harmony. We are most certainly a world of many different types. In thinking about how the world will change post PO, it is most certain that consumerism and materialism will fall flat. The materialistic types are easier to predict for PO than others. These are the types where the immense threat to their worldview could easily lead to them hoarding supplies, or if they are not in a position to gain supplies easily they could take from others. Another option is these types could lose all hope and purpose in life and simply die rather quickly. That brings us to another point, that we all need to have a purpose in life and if we truely believe that there is no purpose we will go into a downward spiral FAST. In the 1929 stock market crash, some reacted so fast to the news they jumped out of the building they were in as to try and escape the reality. Others fell into a deep state of depression and died in a matter of months. We all have the ability to self terminate if we believe our purpose is up. As further example, some people get so attached to the person they marry that when they die, they themselves go soon after. One recent case in public light was Christopher Reeve, once he went his young relatively healthy wife got lung cancer and died a matter of months later. Another is Johnny Cash, his wife went, he went a few months after. Lesson, be careful what you let yourself completely attach to.

So getting back to the different types, the materialists will surely be threatened bigtime. The strippers and prostitutes of this world will be fine, this type of person craves money and if the US dollar or whathaveyou goes belly up they will be the first to adapt to a new currency of some kind. The folks that crave harmony, that everyone gets along wont be happy for sure. Many will probably off themselves. Myself, I crave substance and the intangible mostly. I'm luckier than most as I know PO wont effect me to the severity it will the tangible type.

So in any case it will be survival of the fittest, but how that comes to play is when what's in people's heads meets reality, or rather reality meets them. That's when TSHTF. Those that can or already have adapted their paradigm to be able to handle the crisis will statistically be in the ultimate position to survive it. Don't underestimate the tangible types though when they go nuts, many of them will self terminate, but be assured the ones that fight hard you will not want to be around. People that feel they may be sacrificing their life will easily be apt to sacrifice others. Knowing how to read people, to know who to associate with and who to not to may be the most vital PO skill of all.
User avatar
mmasters
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun 16 Apr 2006, 03:00:00
Location: Mid-Atlantic

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron