Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Oil & NGas Infrastructure Thread (merged)

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby marko » Fri 02 Sep 2005, 23:34:27

In my opinion, the two most critical pieces of information for assessing Katrina's likely impact on the economy are 1) the amount of damage at refineries and the time required to get them back in operation, and 2) the state of the natural gas supply from the Gulf.
I have been scouring the news and have yet to see any clear-cut assessment of either of these. Day after day it is just vague statements and spin. I find it hard to imagine that the various energy companies do not know where they stand in these areas several days after the weather cleared.
I strongly suspect that the media companies and the corporate sector in general are running scared and hoping to placate the public with soothing words and sideshows to try to keep the financial markets from going into a tailspin.
User avatar
marko
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon 31 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Massachusetts

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby frankthetank » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:08:21

From the above link
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'A')fter Hurricane Georges in 1998, the refinery flooded and it took three months to resume operations. That lesson learned, Renfroe said the company built a five-mile long hurricane dike 20 feet above sea level, which helped "a great deal" during Katrina

I've seen the photos of overhead from the refinery and flooding looked to be the worse of it, but how much can you really tell from a couple of sat shots..
User avatar
frankthetank
Light Sweet Crude
Light Sweet Crude
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Thu 16 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southwest WI

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby EnemyCombatant » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:14:41

On Tuesday the mayor and governor said that NO would be back to normal in 3 weeks.
We know that they are spinning the damage to the refineries, oil platforms, and infrastructure.
Think about it. If there were catastrophic damage, would they tell us? Of course not, that wouldn't be wise. They are doing the right thing by not telling us and hopefully devising a plan to make a soft landing.
But who am I kidding. I am assuming we have competent leadership. :roll:
Now why didn't I take the blue pill.
User avatar
EnemyCombatant
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby ab0di » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:15:20

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'P')lenty of doom to go around in that last post. The part about grain and the ports is a biggie, considering harvesting time is very near.
Where will the farmers put the grains?

In past storage shortages, I've seen corn stored on the ground under tarps. Corn needs to be dried to 15.5% moisture or it will deteriorate in storage. This is done with propane or forced air drying (or a combination). I wonder if we'll get to a point where the farmers will just leave the corn in the field rather than losing money on the diesel and propane needed to pick and dry it.
Corn prices are already dropping: $1.165 / bushel today. I had a local heating company in today to see about installing a 55,000 BTU corn burning heating stove. Natural gas prices are going to be incredible this winter--if they can keep the pressure up.
All politics emanates from a barrel of oil. -- after Mirabeau
ab0di
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun 03 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Iowa

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby backstop » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:28:43

Marko -
Maybe a third item should be added as a distinct entity alongside the 2 critical factors you cite of refinery and gas-rig down time - that of undersea pipeline damage.
There was a report today of 38 rigs lost, of which some will have dragged their anchors and drifted before sinking. Plus another 10 mislayed (drifted) of which at least one drifted sixty miles, possibly dragging its anchors through god-knows-what pipe networks.
Given the modern industry's dislike of carrying reserve skilled labour, plus labour being lost/injured/detained by chaos on shore, it may be that even the inspection of pipelines will take more time than the corporations care to admit. If this is right, then their repair time actually remains an open question.
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Jaymax » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 00:30:35

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('frankthetank', 'I')'ve seen the photos of overhead from the refinery and flooding looked to be the worse of it, but how much can you really tell from a couple of sat shots..

In the Pascagoula photos (up in the thread somewhere) it actually looks pretty much dry - I was one chimney toppled, a few more that looked perhaps a little angled - and several large vent-fan covers blown off. Possibly one tank that'd moved, what looked like a puff of smoke from an admin building...
But lots of debris in the surrounding pictures - lots of heavy lumps of wood and steel being blown into and around the refinery pipes at 130mph or more...
Doomerosity now at 2 (occasionaly 3, was 4)

Currently (mostly) taking a break from posting at po.com. Don't trust the false prophets of doom - keep reading, keep learning, keep challenging your assum
User avatar
Jaymax
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: England

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:15:52

to get the oil/natgas infrastructure operational again, they need to move skilled labour and materials into the affected areas. they need electricity. but the roads and ports are a mess and even more critically, the labour has taken refuge God-knows-where and the rigs and ships needed to survey and fix the mess do not exist.

no good estimates on restoration of capacity because no one knows. but the operators must be dreading finding out.

just figuring out how they are going to move resources (labour and materials) into the needed places must be a nightmare scenario that has not been planned for.
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Jaymax » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:20:26

One of the refineries reported that a whole quarter of their staff had turned up for work, like this was supposed to make us feel confident!

--J
Doomerosity now at 2 (occasionaly 3, was 4)

Currently (mostly) taking a break from posting at po.com. Don't trust the false prophets of doom - keep reading, keep learning, keep challenging your assum
User avatar
Jaymax
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: England

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby backstop » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:26:53

If I'd been planning to invest serious funds in extended oil or gas operations in the GOM a week ago, in view of the scope for year-on-year intensification of hurricane activity, I guess I'd be having second thoughts by now.

And if I were an insurer of rigs, pipelines and operations ? My rates have to be rising to at least what the market will bear . .

Backstop
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:29:43

I think they are low-balling the damage, giving the most positive spin possible. Why wouldn't they? If they say, "We just lost a big chunk of our production, probably for years" their stock price would plummet. They aren't going to tell the truth until it's absolutely necessary.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Eli » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:34:22

It's funny how natural gas production is such non story with winter coming and all. I guess once they send in divers to find the 50 platforms that were lost we will all be ok.

They will never tell the truth just spin harder and faster.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 01:43:16

i would have thought that potentially natgas is a bigger problem than gasoline, since the US doesn't have significant LNG facilities in place for imports to make up a shortfall.
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 02:23:15

link
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')il Refineries Update Ticker Staff
123jump.com Last Update Sep 2 2005
Marathon Oil Corporation
The company has begun damage assessments of all facilities in areas affected by hurricane Katrina, and the Company is providing assistance to employees and neighboring communities impacted by the storm.
Activities are focused on the Company's Garyville, Louisiana, refinery, which has 245,000 barrels per day of crude oil processing capacity, as well as the Marathon-operated offshore oil and gas production platforms at South Pass (located 100 miles south of New Orleans) and Ewing Bank (located 130 miles south of New Orleans).
Gross production from these facilities of approximately 18,500 barrels of oil per day (bpd) and 25 million cubic feet of natural gas per day (mmcfd), remains shut-in as a result of the storm.
Marathon's total net production from these operated facilities, as well as other non-operated properties, is approximately 43,000 bpd and 110 mmcfd and this production remains shut-in as a result of the hurricane.

Murphy Oil Corporation
...No assessment has been made regarding pipelines nor can any estimated timeline be given at this time for restarting either facility or any of our other offshore Louisiana production. Some flooding occurred at the Company’s 125,000 barrel a day refinery in Meraux, Louisiana.
While repair to part of the plant’s electrical equipment and instrumentation, as well as a general cleanup of the facility, will be necessary, the refinery appears to have sustained no major damage from the storm. However, no estimate can be provided regarding timing of start-up.

ConocoPhillips
Several ConocoPhillips facilities were impacted by hurricane Katrina:
Alliance refinery remains shut down and access is limited due to flooding in the area. Most of offshore production remains shut in, however we are moving employees back to the platforms to begin assessing the situation.
In addition, many of employees have been affected by the devastation left by hurricane Katrina and the resultant flooding in Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama.

Chevron
Chevron today announced that it safely evacuated all of its offshore employees and contractors from facilities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico prior to the approach of hurricane Katrina. Chevron continues to produce some oil and natural gas in the Western Gulf of Mexico region. Chevron’s New Orleans office is temporarily closed and employees and contractors who work there were advised to follow evacuation recommendations made by government agencies where they reside.
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 12:16:08

Natural gas is definitely the biggest problem. We can bid up the price of oil and cause "demand destruction" in poorer countries. Natural gas is much harder to import. As it is, we were on a knife-edge. Many were expecting rolling blackouts this winter, simply because of the unusually hot summer. Katrina's just made it a hell of a lot worse.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Leanan » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 14:29:25

An article about Fourchon: Washington Post
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby RealJoe » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 18:03:14

Energycombatant,

My point was more of a question and one that I put into a separate post, not knowing it would be merged into the Katrina-Infrastructure thread. If I can condense my post into a point, then it is that a lack of skilled petroleum field workers and engineers is a very serious situation. One that is not likely to be remedied easily. I simply didn't know what the actual situation in the petroleum drilling and refining industries are and was seeking more factual data.

What's your point with the hostility?
User avatar
RealJoe
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed 26 Jan 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby EnemyCombatant » Sat 03 Sep 2005, 23:06:52

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RealJoe', 'E')nergycombatant

Cool handle name.
Now why didn't I take the blue pill.
User avatar
EnemyCombatant
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed 16 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby Starvid » Sun 04 Sep 2005, 20:10:34

Damn that natural gas, you should never have started using it!
Luckily, there are alternative ways to heat your home. Some of them are impossible to do for a single person, like central heating from your local steam plant, but others work very well for a single house.
* Solar heating will take care of all your heating needs only if you live in a rather warm place. Still, it's is a good complement in colder areas.
* Better insulation can probably reduce your heating bill quite a lot. It is possible to build houses without any heating except human heat and heat from electrical appliances, even if you get -20 degrees Celsius in the winter.
* Heat pumps. These turn heat in the air, earth or lakes into heat for your home. Excellent!
* Wood stoves. Modern wood stoves are good, easy to use products. Only problem is that you have to live close to a forest ( and I figure it is not legal to pick dead branches from the ground in other peoples forests in the US?).
* Direct electrical heat. Completely useless if your electricity is generated by natural gas. But if it is nuclear or hydro you might give this one a shot, though I recomend the other alternatives more.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
User avatar
Starvid
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Sun 20 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Uppsala, Sweden

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby tokyo_to_motueka » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 04:23:51

Grim Outlook for 4 Gulf Coast Refineries
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'T')he prospects for the other four refineries that shut down ahead of the storm are more dire. The plants, in hard-hit areas southeast of New Orleans and in Mississippi, can process some 880,000 barrels a day of crude, more than 5 percent of total U.S. capacity.
Chevron Corp.'s 325,000 barrel a day Pascagoula, Miss., facility and ConocoPhillips' 255,000 barrel a day Alliance refinery in Belle Chasse, La., have suffered "major damage," the Energy Department said.
Murphy Oil Corp.'s 120,000 barrel a day Meraux, La., refinery and the 183,000 barrel a day refinery at Chalmette, La., owned by ExxonMobil and Petroleos de Venezuela SA, suffered water damage, the DOE said. Murphy has said the flooding is a few feet deep.
"There's still some water in the plant," Murphy spokeswoman Mindy West said Sunday. Once the water is out, Murphy will have to clean out units and repair electrical equipment, West said. She wouldn't say when Murphy expects to complete those procedures.
The Chalmette refinery continues to assess damage, spokeswoman Nora Scheller said Sunday. There is no thought yet of a restart timetable, she said.
User avatar
tokyo_to_motueka
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 486
Joined: Tue 19 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Tochigi
Top

Re: Katrina - Oil Infrastructure

Unread postby fluffy » Mon 05 Sep 2005, 05:52:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Starvid', '*') Direct electrical heat. Completely useless if your electricity is generated by natural gas. But if it is nuclear or hydro you might give this one a shot, though I recomend the other alternatives more.

And you've just hit the idiocy of the Dash-For-Gas on the head:
Natural Gas and Electricity are mutual substitutes for home heating, cooking, hydrogen production, and many industrial processes requiring heat. Hence in theory market forces should operate to make sure that there is no long term shortage of either. (Eventually, of course, NG would run out and be replaced entriely with nuclear electric power.)
EXCEPT, if you do something stupid like start generating electricity with natural gas, in which case your wonderful market-balanced mechanism becomes a critical strategic vunerability. Once upon a time, of course, there was a ban on constructing NG-fired electric plants for this very reason.
User avatar
fluffy
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon 26 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: UK
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests