Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Time for Trains to make a come back.

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby bentstrider » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 07:31:27

Even after trains come back and most auto transport kicks the bucket, people will still be able to live wherever the hell they want.
But, the varying environment will decide who will make the cut.
Along with the return of rail travel and centralized activity, I also see the return of the true "outdoorsmen", and the true loners who like to drop the proverbial thermonuclear F-Bombs on the world.
bentstrider
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon 25 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southern California Desert

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby sklump » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 09:05:07

How much oil does it take to manufacture and lay 1 km of track? To manufacture a locomotive? Seriously, I have no idea.

It takes 90 barrels to manufacture a car. So if the US has 200 million cars, to replace the fleet with hybrids or clean fairy-tech, that makes a staggering 18 billion barrels. On the downslope, that just isn't going to happen.
As Canadian as ... possible, under the circumstances
User avatar
sklump
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Tue 17 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby Wildwell » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 09:42:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sklump', 'H')ow much oil does it take to manufacture and lay 1 km of track? To manufacture a locomotive? Seriously, I have no idea.

It takes 90 barrels to manufacture a car. So if the US has 200 million cars, to replace the fleet with hybrids or clean fairy-tech, that makes a staggering 18 billion barrels. On the downslope, that just isn't going to happen.


It does not take 90 barrels of oil to manufacture a car, other energy sources are used. And once you have oil alternatives than work and can be paid for, it doesn't really matter does it?

http://peakoildebunked.blogspot.com/
User avatar
Wildwell
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1962
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby I_Like_Plants » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 11:31:08

That peakoildebunked site is well worth reading! For one thing, the author is walking the walk, no car, no major oil use, train/bike etc instead. No.2 the author is showing some of the arguements against peak oil, which deserve a hearing. Well done!
I_Like_Plants
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3839
Joined: Sun 12 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 1st territorial capitol of AZ

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby Eli » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 11:57:19

Regardless of how much oil it takes trains are a much more effective use of energy.


Which would takes more energy to maintain thousands of trains on steal tracks or millions upon millions of cars and the highways they ride upon?

Trains are a much better use of energy resources.
User avatar
Eli
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3709
Joined: Sat 18 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: In a van down by the river

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby bentstrider » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 18:02:15

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Eli', 'R')egardless of how much oil it takes trains are a much more effective use of energy.


Which would takes more energy to maintain thousands of trains on steal tracks or millions upon millions of cars and the highways they ride upon?

Trains are a much better use of energy resources.


Damn skippy!
Not to mention railroad companies already carry mini-versions of their infrastructure on their own trains.
You could easily haul tracks and ties, and lay them anywhere you pretty much please with minimal effort.
In order to make an asphalt highway, you have to move the entire mountain and everything on it.
Not to mention the way trains, Diesel and steam, are built, they too will outlast a typical, modern road-hog of a four-wheeler!!
bentstrider
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon 25 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southern California Desert

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby BabyPeanut » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 20:17:48

AIRLINES FOREVER!
$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '[')b]Bankruptcy Not Expected to Close Delta

By MICHELINE MAYNARD
Published: August 28, 2005

The financial problems of Delta Air Lines are prompting customers to wonder what to expect if it seeks bankruptcy protection this fall. Based on what has happened at other airlines, they should be prepared for some changes, but they should not expect it to shut down - Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection is intended to give companies the opportunity to keep operating while they reorganize.
--More--
BabyPeanut
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 3275
Joined: Tue 17 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: 39° 39' N 77° 77' W or thereabouts

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 21:49:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('sklump', 'H')ow much oil does it take to manufacture and lay 1 km of track? To manufacture a locomotive? Seriously, I have no idea.


Steel production doesn't (necessarily) depend on Oil - indeed, given that most railways were built at a time when the Oil industry wasn't even though of, then they can "do" the task, without too much input from Oil. I cannot tell you exactly how much Oil is used to make a disel locomotive these days It would be plenty, thanks to the miles & miles of isulation on the wires, alone. But when Steam Was King, I can tell you exactly how much Oil was used: ZERO.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'I')t takes 90 barrels to manufacture a car. So if the US has 200 million cars, to replace the fleet with hybrids or clean fairy-tech, that makes a staggering 18 billion barrels. On the downslope, that just isn't going to happen.


UH, like I say - most railways and most locomotives (for example, steam) were built at a time when the Oil industry did not exist. Railways have already shown they can run quite effectively, thank you, without the vast quantities of Oil that's talked about these days.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia
Top

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby Laurasia » Fri 26 Aug 2005, 23:39:43

I love travelling by train. Here in the US they should combine freight and passenger service in one train by just adding a few extra carriages on the back. Since there are so many more freight than passenger trains, that would open up a lot more routes to potential passengers if it was advertised properly. It would not be all that glamorous but it would catch on FAST if the price were right.

Regards,

L.
User avatar
Laurasia
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toughing it out in suburbia

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby bentstrider » Sat 27 Aug 2005, 19:40:00

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Laurasia', 'I') love travelling by train. Here in the US they should combine freight and passenger service in one train by just adding a few extra carriages on the back. Since there are so many more freight than passenger trains, that would open up a lot more routes to potential passengers if it was advertised properly. It would not be all that glamorous but it would catch on FAST if the price were right.

Regards,

L.


Now that's what you call a "mixed train", for real.
High volume freight, plus a couple of cars for passengers that want to get from point A to point B.
I'm pretty sure there's plenty of people out there up to the task of restoring some old passenger cars.
bentstrider
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 375
Joined: Mon 25 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Southern California Desert
Top

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Sat 27 Aug 2005, 21:03:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Laurasia', 'I') love travelling by train. Here in the US they should combine freight and passenger service in one train by just adding a few extra carriages on the back. Since there are so many more freight than passenger trains, that would open up a lot more routes to potential passengers if it was advertised properly. It would not be all that glamorous but it would catch on FAST if the price were right.

Regards,

L.


Ahh, one of the problems with that idea (of merely adding passenger carriages to the rear of these looong looong freight trains) is that when the locomotives start moving forward, the front of the train moves 80 feet before the rear of the train starts to move at all. This is due to the tiny amount of "slack" in each coupling between the wagons.

This tends to mean the rear of the train accelerates super-quick and tends to get yanked off from a standing start. If you happened to be standing up at the time (say putting your luggage away), you tend to find yourself lying down at the end of the carriage in a big heap.

Also the locomotive driver (engineer in the US) has to try and "spot" the rear of the train to the right place (ie: on the platform) and when the damn train weighs 13,000 tonnes and is over a mile in length, that's no easy task.

If the freight trains were slightly less in length, then perhaps.

But Amtrak should be allowed to haul "light freight" in the US (and Aussie railways shoudl follow example).

The freight that the other guys cannot get - if Amtrak can pick it up, then they should be welcome to it. What happens right now is the idiots are so competitive that they cannot see that if they give Amtrak credit for picking the business up, then they shoudl allow 'em to run it.
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia
Top

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby Laurasia » Sun 28 Aug 2005, 22:42:05

Okay; it's a good point you've made about the length of the freight train with the poor passengers stuck at the back, and no platform to disembark onto. So....put the passenger carriages on the front, right behind the engine, and make a rule to allow passenger disembarkation FIRST, before all the freight stuff. There would be glitches but with a bit of ingenuity they could be worked out. But I also like your idea of giving light freight to Amtrak. This is off topic a bit but I know that in the seventies you could send small packages by Greyhound bus (which I think might be described as US' major national passenger bus line) - it was sort of unofficial I think and I don't know if they still do it.

Just my tuppence...

Regards,

L.
User avatar
Laurasia
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 544
Joined: Sat 10 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Toughing it out in suburbia

Re: Time for Trains to make a come back.

Unread postby ubercynicmeister » Mon 29 Aug 2005, 20:22:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Laurasia', 'O')kay; it's a good point you've made about the length of the freight train with the poor passengers stuck at the back, and no platform to disembark onto.


Ahhh...that's the general idea, yes.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')So....put the passenger carriages on the front, right behind the engine, and make a rule to allow passenger disembarkation FIRST, before all the freight stuff.


You're gonna think I'm being awkward just for the sake of being awkward, but, well...you see there's a problem with that, too.

Um, the drawgear on the average passenger carriage is good for (I am told) about 1200 tonnes. If one places them at the FRONT, then the chances of ripping the drawgear out of the pasenger carriages is very high.

What do I mean?

Passenger carriages are designed to only take a certain loading when being towed. If there's only one carriage, then that's the entire weight of the train - but if one places carriages behind the first, then when the locomotive starts to tow the train away from a stop, that load-of-the-train has to be transmitted through each carriage, accumulating as one goes forward, towards the locomotive.

This is done via the couplings between each carriage. They are known as "drawgear".The heavier the train, the more the force of the train that each coupler (drawgear) has to transmit.

Most passenger trains are fairly light things (in comparison to their equivalent freight counterparts), therfore they have light drawgear.

If one tries to place 13,000 tonnes behind them, you'll just rip the drawgear out of the first passenger carriage . Now, one could add "strengthening" to the drawgear, that's true...but it costs a lot of money.

In any case, the freight trains tend to be of the "slow" variety - they get put away in sidings, they shunt at obscure locations in the middle of the night, they take long-out-of-the-way detours to pick up and drop off wagons.

Passenger trains tend to be somewhat faster - this is where the idea of using "Amtrak" to take high-value light freight works so well with passenger trains. If one has light freight, then the train ends up well within the drawgear limit of passenger wagons.

It works together really well.

The other thing that started to happen in Europe is the use of passenger terminals as direct-to-the-centre-of-the-city fast freight stops - where the small light freight train does a "fast drop off" in the middle of a European city - thus by-passing all of the traffic hold ups that the typical trucking firm has to deal with.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')ut I also like your idea of giving light freight to Amtrak. This is off topic a bit but I know that in the seventies you could send small packages by Greyhound bus (which I think might be described as US' major national passenger bus line) - it was sort of unofficial I think and I don't know if they still do it.


LOL, yes, the small light stuff is IDEAL (see above)

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'J')ust my tuppence...

Regards,

L.


I thought it was worth a bit more than that! Tuppence ha'penny, at least!
User avatar
ubercynicmeister
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Sun 25 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Hunter Valley, New South Wales, Australia
Top

Previous

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron