Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Oil production outlook 2005-2040

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 07:56:40

The draft version of my oil production outlook based on coming oil projects and depletion is finished

You can find the newest version here

Peak Oil Netherlands

If you have any comments, criticism or additions please add them in this thread.

The text has been improved (maybe some slight errors still) and some comments have been taken into account
Last edited by Taskforce_Unity on Tue 06 Sep 2005, 19:19:16, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby jato » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 08:05:51

Saudi Arabia has 259.4 billion barrels of proven reserves? Isn't that very optimistic?
jato
 

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 08:18:52

those reserve numbers are just references from the Oil & Gas Journal.

They are not used in any way in this outlook

:lol:
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby jato » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 08:21:10

Then take out the garbage. 8)
jato
 

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 08:40:53

nah, i will post an Oil and Gas journal reference and a statement. it has its function for reference purposes.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby khebab » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 11:43:55

I think your estimate for Canadian tar sands is maybe a little bit pessimistic, I've read somewhere that the URR is estimated to be 280-300Gb. The objective of 2.6-2.8 mbpd in 2015 is conservative and assumes a $35 a barrel, it 's safe to think that a $50 a barrel is now the norm and will boost investment.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 12:11:49

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', 'I') think your estimate for Canadian tar sands is maybe a little bit pessimistic, I've read somewhere that the URR is estimated to be 280-300Gb. The objective of 2.6-2.8 mbpd in 2015 is conservative and assumes a $35 a barrel, it 's safe to think that a $50 a barrel is now the norm and will boost investment.


I think you misread, I added a quote on page 15 about Canadian production stating a 2.6 mb/d level in 2015.

At Oil production outlook it says:

New liquids production from 17 producing areas adding 1.57 mb/d. Adding up with the current 1.3 mb/d gives a production level of 2.9 mb/d in 2010.

A little bit bullish maybe..

Ill consider making it more clear what's in and what is not in the production calculations
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Shiraz » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 12:53:46

Question/criticism:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'B')) Method
Oil production figures are taken from the Oil, Gas, Coal and Electricity Quarterly Statistics. Based on these
figures a decline rate is calculated for countries which have peaked and declined for several years. The decline
rate for the years 2005-2010 is calculated by taking the average decline rate from the peak.
In the case of an indication that a country is going to peak or an underlying decline rate, data from various sources
is analyzed and a probably decline rate is estimated for a certain part of the countries oil production.
Added to the declining oil production are new oil projects taken from various sources.


I'm not perfectly clear on this but, the way I read it, what you are doing is taking an estimated decline rate, extrapolating, then adding new projects on to that. This seems to be inconsistent because, after all, the historic decline rate has persisted despite new projects in the past. Alternatively, you may be referring to the rate of depletion of the existing resource base. It is ambiguous as to which of these you refer in places, and I hope this is not ambiguous in later updates.

In general then, it would be nice if for each country, along with the other pieces of data listed (proven reserves etc.), we might be able to see the estimated rate of depletion of the existing resource base, and also the estimated decline rate (for the post-peak countries). After all, these are the core estimates that generate the prediction.

Actually, I wonder whether you need to use a decline rate at all? Wouldn't it make more sense to simply take the rate of depletion of the existing resource base and add new projects to that? To be honest, at first I thought this is what you had done, but this doesn't seem to make sense in the study. For example, if you look at Argentina, you list a decline rate 1998 - 2004 as 3.1%. 3.1% cannot therefore be the rate of depletion of the existing resource base unless there were no new projects coming online in Argentina during this period. And logically, if you are extrapolating this 3.1% decline rate in Argentina, it makes no sense to add new projects to this number, because this number is historic decline, including any recent additions from new projects.

I hope that is all quite clear.

Thanks for puting together such a good report.
Shiraz
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 87
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby rockdoc123 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 12:56:47

Good piece of detective work Taskforce_Unity. Just some comments from my own perspective realizing that you have to incorporate published information.

Libya...I think their comments on Libya are very pessimistic. As they mention coming on-stream immediately is the Elephant field in the Murzuk basin but I also know that NOC made a discovery below Intisar field that they claim has 2-3 billion barrels in it (would be in the Sarir Fm). As well with the Oasis group and now Oxy returning to their old assets I think there is considerable opportunity for additional discoveries. Talking with many of the expats who worked for Sirte, Agoco and Waha since nationalization it would seem there is a lot of near field stepout exploration that is possible. There are also a number of discoveries that were never brought on stream simply because Sirte and Agoco did not have the budget....at $60 oil these will definitely be developed.

Qatar.....another one that might be slightly pessimistic. Maersk is sitting on some 20 billion barrels of oil at Al Shaheen. There plans are to double their current production levels over the next couple of years. But perhaps when you take into account declines at the other reservoirs (Bul Hanine, Al Rayaan etc.) this will just be part of the noise?

Algeria....seems optimistic to me. In order to have the increases in 2008 and 2009 that would mean that there would have to be new discoveries sitting out there waiting to be developed. The only non-gas discovery not yet on stream as far as I know would be Anadarko's El Merk which isn't huge. Algeria is producing full out as far as I know....are the numbers here official OPEC production quota numbers or actuals?

Norway....there was a bit of noise recently about a largish discovery near Trolls (600 MMB according to the early reports which was pooh poohed later on by the operator). There are a number of areas re-opening to exploration which might bring some upside but again as you point out they have likely peaked so any additions will just slow the decline.

But of course the wild card is Saudi and as pointed out so many times in these threads without knowing how much they really have accurate predictions about peak are difficult since they make up so much of the yet to be produced.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 14:46:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shiraz', 'Q')uestion/criticism:

I'm not perfectly clear on this but, the way I read it, what you are doing is taking an estimated decline rate, extrapolating, then adding new projects on to that. This seems to be inconsistent because, after all, the historic decline rate has persisted despite new projects in the past. Alternatively, you may be referring to the rate of depletion of the existing resource base. It is ambiguous as to which of these you refer in places, and I hope this is not ambiguous in later updates.


This is correct for countries which have already peaked. It is ofcourse not the correct situation but an estimate. Since there are some big projects coming onstream (for example the USA, thunderhorse, atlantis etc..) it is quite possible that the decline rate seen in previous years is halted. It is not very likely but in some cases possible.

Ofcourse a better estimate is made by incorporating past projects and looking at the effect on the specificic fields declining. That would take so much time to find out however that i did not make that attempt. Then again we can question if it will change the outlook that much.

I understand also from khebab's post that it is not entirely clear how much outside sources or quotes about decline rates have been taken seriously.

My point was that everything under the heading:

Oil production outlook

is incorporated into the actual calculation, the rest (decline rate: and specific information: is just a guideline).

I will make this more clear in later versions.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shiraz', '
')In general then, it would be nice if for each country, along with the other pieces of data listed (proven reserves etc.), we might be able to see the estimated rate of depletion of the existing resource base, and also the estimated decline rate (for the post-peak countries). After all, these are the core estimates that generate the prediction.


As far as i understand this is already stated under decline rate?

The incorporated decline rate is stated at oil production outlook? Or do you want the absolute decline as in numbers?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shiraz', '
')Actually, I wonder whether you need to use a decline rate at all? Wouldn't it make more sense to simply take the rate of depletion of the existing resource base and add new projects to that?


This approach is taken for most countries

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Shiraz', '
')For example, if you look at Argentina, you list a decline rate 1998 - 2004 as 3.1%. 3.1% cannot therefore be the rate of depletion of the existing resource base unless there were no new projects coming online in Argentina during this period. And logically, if you are extrapolating this 3.1% decline rate in Argentina, it makes no sense to add new projects to this number, because this number is historic decline, including any recent additions from new projects.


In the case of Argentina no new projects are known to me so i assumed that the decline trend as seen between 1998 and 2004 will continue. let me explain:

I do not know if there are coming any new projects (could not find any)
New projects are usually not added every year in a peaked country.

This makes the average historic decline a fairly accurate estimate in my opinion. If any new projects are coming online (which i do not know of) they are taken into account (since historic decline also takes these into account) and if there are no new projects then i also take this into account (since on a likely basis historic decline did not see new project additions every year).

I could also make a random guess but that would be very inaccurate and based on nothing... Since i do not have any more data i have taken this approach

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Just some comments from my own perspective realizing that you have to incorporate published information.


Yep, any additional information on fields coming onstream and new discoveries is helpful.


$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Libya...I think their comments on Libya are very pessimistic. As they mention coming on-stream immediately is the Elephant field in the Murzuk basin but I also know that NOC made a discovery below Intisar field that they claim has 2-3 billion barrels in it (would be in the Sarir Fm). As well with the Oasis group and now Oxy returning to their old assets I think there is considerable opportunity for additional discoveries. Talking with many of the expats who worked for Sirte, Agoco and Waha since nationalization it would seem there is a lot of near field stepout exploration that is possible. There are also a number of discoveries that were never brought on stream simply because Sirte and Agoco did not have the budget....at $60 oil these will definitely be developed.



Hmmz interesting and i agree that it is probably too pessimistic, if you can name these fields i can try to look them up and incorporate them. The Elephant field is included though. Do you have any idea if the decline estimate is accurate?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Qatar.....another one that might be slightly pessimistic. Maersk is sitting on some 20 billion barrels of oil at Al Shaheen. There plans are to double their current production levels over the next couple of years. But perhaps when you take into account declines at the other reservoirs (Bul Hanine, Al Rayaan etc.) this will just be part of the noise?


Don't know anything about Al Shaheen, ill look it up later. I have very little data on Qatar except that PFC energy thinks they have produced 62% of their reserves already. This means that they will probably be in the plateau fase at the moment. They might even start declining the coming 5 years..

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Algeria....seems optimistic to me. In order to have the increases in 2008 and 2009 that would mean that there would have to be new discoveries sitting out there waiting to be developed. The only non-gas discovery not yet on stream as far as I know would be Anadarko's El Merk which isn't huge. Algeria is producing full out as far as I know....are the numbers here official OPEC production quota numbers or actuals?


On pagina 41 you can see that i incorporated 2 projects, the Rhourde El Baguel and additional fields from the Berkine Basin. El Merk is probably a field from in the Berkine Basin.

According to your information these fields are already in production?

I did use the same method for each country. That is estimating a decline rate from either historical figures or additional outside info and add any projects which i could find.

The historical production figures come from the EIA, i do not know if they are accurate but it is the best dataset i have. I did not add any production numbers from OPEC.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Norway....there was a bit of noise recently about a largish discovery near Trolls (600 MMB according to the early reports which was pooh poohed later on by the operator). There are a number of areas re-opening to exploration which might bring some upside but again as you point out they have likely peaked so any additions will just slow the decline.


If you know the names i can look them up. I did not figure in any "possible future discoveries" in the 2005-2010 outlook since that is far too vague. They are incorporated in the 2010-2040 outlook. They have peaked to my knowledge and decline is accelerating a little bit given the official figures from Norwegian companies.


Thanks for the comments so far, really helpful :)
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby khebab » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 15:18:56

This is really a nice work, you seem to put PO between 2010 and 1015 which is also the conclusion from the French report on PO. A few comments:
- on Figure 5: it will be nice to split the total production outlook in OPEC and non-OPEC productions and maybe conventionnal/unconventionnal oil. A vertical grid could also make the graph easier to read.
- on Figure 2: are the two lines (blue and green) for projected demand? why the two lines do not start from the same point (end of 2005).
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 15:32:23

Khebab can you provide me with the actual sentences or pages were they say a peak between 2010 and 2015 in that french report? (my french is not good enough).

As far as i know they are just talking about a peak between 2012 and 2100....

Is it their actual conclusion that the peak will happen that fast??

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('khebab', '
')- on Figure 5: it will be nice to split the total production outlook in OPEC and non-OPEC productions and maybe conventionnal/unconventionnal oil. A vertical grid could also make the graph easier to read.
- on Figure 2: are the two lines (blue and green) for projected demand? why the two lines do not start from the same point (end of 2005).


Hmmz strange i wanted to make a split between non OPEC and OPEC in picture 2. I will incorporate that, on picture 5 it cannot be done since i made a "big heap" and no seperate production figures.

Il make a vertical grid on picture 5. The 2 lines are for a 1% growth and a 2% growth scenario starting from 2004 on.

Revising the figures is added to my list.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby khebab » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 15:50:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Taskforce_Unity', 'K')hebab can you provide me with the actual sentences or pages were they say a peak between 2010 and 2015 in that french report? (my french is not good enough).

As far as i know they are just talking about a peak between 2012 and 2100....

Is it their actual conclusion that the peak will happen that fast??


you could check back the thread Oilcast #7: French government examines `peak oil` theory. I translated one of their conclusion:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'w')e see that already available reserves in 2005 (i.e. 1080 Gb) are superior to the world need for the period 2005-2030 estimated to be 984Gb (based on a 2%/year demand growth). However, it won't be enough to satisfy demand beyond 2013 because of limitations and constraints in oil recovery (depletion): only 695Gb of the 1080Gb can be exploited: 695Gb= 190Gb (fields already discovered but not exploited) + 505Gb (fields currently exploited)
...
They believe we can discover 20Gb of new reserves each year until 2030 wich puts the peak in 2023 at 113Mbd. The investment required is estimated to be about 250 G$ each year!


So yes the peak could be push back if we discover new supply.
______________________________________
http://GraphOilogy.blogspot.com
khebab
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon 27 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby bruin » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 16:20:47

Great report. You dealt very well with published reports. I actually found it very encouraging since I've been expecting a peak in 2008.
User avatar
bruin
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu 09 Dec 2004, 04:00:00
Location: CA, USA

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby rrb » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 18:30:08

Just a minor detail, in figure 2, the 1% and 2% growth
curves look linear.
But 1% or 2% growth year on year means that the curves
should go up exponentially. So, the 1% curve starting at
about 84800 (if I read it correctly) should end closer to
90000 than the 89000 it now does. Likewise for the 2% curve.
User avatar
rrb
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue 23 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 18:42:06

Point of own reflection: Russian production needs editing, it is probably too low.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '=')"RRB"]
"Just a minor detail, in figure 2, the 1% and 2% growth
curves look linear.
But 1% or 2% growth year on year means that the curves
should go up exponentially. So, the 1% curve starting at
about 84800 (if I read it correctly) should end closer to
90000 than the 89000 it now does. Likewise for the 2% curve."


On a five year basis it shows up linear, at 1% and 2% it needs basicly more then 15-20 years to be able to see the exponential trend. If i would add a 4% curve you could see an exponential trend.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby rockdoc123 » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 19:22:43

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'H')mmz interesting and i agree that it is probably too pessimistic, if you can name these fields i can try to look them up and incorporate them. The Elephant field is included though. Do you have any idea if the decline estimate is accurate?

Unfortunately NOC hasn't been very forthcoming with the information. My understanding is the discovery is about 2.5 billion barrels in size in the Cretaceous Sarir Fm. beneath the Intisar field which has been producing from Tertiary reefs for a long time. Maybe as a strawman if you added in another 5-7 billion barrels of discoveries spread out over the next 4-5 years it might be a good approximation of what is possible. Note in Algeria the Berkine basin during period 1994 - 2000 had about 5 billion barrels discovered so probably not a bad approximation. w.r.t Elephant my understanding is your numbers are correct.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'D')on't know anything about Al Shaheen, ill look it up later. I have very little data on Qatar except that PFC energy thinks they have produced 62% of their reserves already. This means that they will probably be in the plateau fase at the moment. They might even start declining the coming 5 years..


Al Shaheen is recognized by both Qatar Petroleum and Maersk to have up to 20 billion barrels...truly a whale of a discovery that really hasn't seen as much press as you would think it should. Currently at 220,000 bopd and will ramp up over next year to a minimum of 400,000 bopd. Of course everything else is either on decline (Dukhan, Bul Hanine etc. or just dribbling along at peak production Al Khalij, Al Raayan, etc).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')n pagina 41 you can see that i incorporated 2 projects, the Rhourde El Baguel and additional fields from the Berkine Basin. El Merk is probably a field from in the Berkine Basin.

According to your information these fields are already in production?


Rhourde El Baguel has been under production for a long time but I believe there is some work being done by BP to increase production although I do not know by how much. As far as I know everything in the Berkine with the exception of El Merk is on stream. El Merk is likely under 100 MMB in size. I'll check WoodMac data to confirm.

With regards to Norway I'll dig around to find the press release I saw recently re: discovery at Trolls.

Note out of interest this PM I went into WoodMackenzie database and plotted up their look forward through to 2020. This data excludes Saudi Arabia but has most other things although I had to add a few things that for some reason were excluded (eg: Chad). Peak production without Kazachstan shows up as being in 2010 with both Angola deepwater and Nigeria deepwater peaking that year. When you include Kazachstan the peak is in 2016. I think the Angola and Nigeria analysis is pretty decent but I will go and pull the detail on Kazachstan. So really it comes down to what you do with Saudi Arabia.

So looks like your analysis agrees with the guys who make loads of dosh to do this kind of thing. :)
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby smiley » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 19:48:52

Good work, however I think the prediuction for Mexico needs some adjustment.

Pemex supplies reasonable field by field information in their statistical yearbook.

stat

You can see that essentially everything except Cantarell is in decline. And Pemex official as well as the EIA have confirmed that Cantarell just hit the onset of the decline this year. That's 60% of Mexico's production declining at a 14% rate. Add that to the decline of the other fields and you get a much steeper decline than your data seem to suggest.

Judging by their latest figures they have a few other problems as well. Juli production is down by 400.000 barrels (probably due to the hurricane or something).

http://www.pemex.com/files/dcpe/eprohidro_ing.pdf
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 23 Aug 2005, 20:10:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Smiley', '
')Pemex supplies reasonable field by field information in their statistical yearbook


Ah thanks didn't know that good information.

I included decline from nearly all regions (from a Simmons paper) (3.14 mb/d declining from 2005 on). Maybe more though ill add stuff from the yearbook soon.

I didn't add in a 14% decline rate though because from the latest news i read (from the new exploration and production head over at pemex) the decline will be less steep (10%). Probably fairly accurate since he said Cantharell was already declining (went from 2.14 mb/d in 2004 to 2.08 mb/d now)

Some new production offsetting decline though i added:

2005 - 220.000 b/d
2006 - 240.000 b/d
2007 - 250.000 b/d
2008 - 250.000 b/d
2009 - 40.000 b/d
2010 - 150.000 b/d

From the Ku-Maloob-Zaap, Crudo Ligero Marino and Lankahuasa basin

Pemex also announced an increase in production in 2006 (which i deem unlikely).

As to Rockdock 123, i don't have anything to add but that i will look into it and am grateful for this new information.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Re: Oil production outlook 2005-2040

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Tue 06 Sep 2005, 11:37:33

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Unfortunately NOC hasn't been very forthcoming with the information. My understanding is the discovery is about 2.5 billion barrels in size in the Cretaceous Sarir Fm. beneath the Intisar field which has been producing from Tertiary reefs for a long time. Maybe as a strawman if you added in another 5-7 billion barrels of discoveries spread out over the next 4-5 years it might be a good approximation of what is possible. Note in Algeria the Berkine basin during period 1994 - 2000 had about 5 billion barrels discovered so probably not a bad approximation. w.r.t Elephant my understanding is your numbers are correct.


Can't really find any good information. You seem to be translating the size of reserves to oil production in a certain way. Can you tell me what the rough correlation is?

I added 200.000 barrels per day of production for new discoveries for Libya

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Al Shaheen is recognized by both Qatar Petroleum and Maersk to have up to 20 billion barrels...truly a whale of a discovery that really hasn't seen as much press as you would think it should. Currently at 220,000 bopd and will ramp up over next year to a minimum of 400,000 bopd. Of course everything else is either on decline (Dukhan, Bul Hanine etc. or just dribbling along at peak production Al Khalij, Al Raayan, etc).


No solid data on Al Shaheen either, the new facility has started up in 2005 and further development is under negotiation... (according to Maersk).

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')Rhourde El Baguel has been under production for a long time but I believe there is some work being done by BP to increase production although I do not know by how much. As far as I know everything in the Berkine with the exception of El Merk is on stream. El Merk is likely under 100 MMB in size. I'll check WoodMac data to confirm.


according to this source

http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/company/cna32664.htm

El Merk North, El Merk East, El Merk and El Kheit Et Tesseka fields will come under development and start production around 2007.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('rockdoc123', '
')With regards to Norway I'll dig around to find the press release I saw recently re: discovery at Trolls.


still needs further analysis on their part. No figures have been published
Last edited by Taskforce_Unity on Tue 06 Sep 2005, 19:21:05, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron