Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

THE Iraqi Civil War Thread (merged)

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Postby Sedona » Mon 06 Sep 2004, 20:37:34

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('JayHMorrison', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Sedona', '
')Think of what would happen to the dollar if that took place.


Not much. Total oil sales on the planet represent only 3% of total dollar transfers on the international currency markets.


Maybe oil sales are 3%, but so long as almost 70% of world trade is done in dollars, the dollar is the currency which central banks accumulate as reserves. But central banks, whether China or Japan or Brazil or Russia, do not simply stack dollars in their vaults. Currencies have one advantage over gold. A central bank can use it to buy the state bonds of the issuer, the United States. Most countries around the world are forced to control trade deficits or face currency collapse. Not the United States. This is because of the dollar reserve currency role. And the underpinning of the reserve role is the petrodollar. Every nation needs to get dollars to import oil, some more than others. This means their trade targets dollar countries, above all the U.S.

Because oil is an essential commodity for every nation, the Petrodollar system, which exists to the present, demands the buildup of huge trade surpluses in order to accumulate dollar surpluses. This is the case for every country but one — the United States which controls the dollar and prints it at will or fiat. Because today the majority of all international trade is done in dollars, countries must go abroad to get the means of payment they cannot themselves issue. The entire global trade structure today works around this dynamic, from Russia to China, from Brazil to South Korea and Japan. Everyone aims to maximize dollar surpluses from their export trade.

To keep this process going, the United States has agreed to be ‘importer of last resort’ because its entire monetary hegemony depends on this dollar recycling.

The central banks of Japan, China, South Korea, Russia and the rest all buy U.S. Treasury securities with their dollars. That in turn allows the United States to have a stable dollar, far lower interest rates, and run a $ 500 billion annual balance of payments deficit with the rest of the world. The Federal Reserve controls the dollar printing presses, and the world needs its dollars. It is as simple as that.

So, I disagree Jay, a move to the euro for oil sales would have a huge impact.
Sedona
 

Postby Sedona » Mon 06 Sep 2004, 20:40:36

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'd')emocratically elected Chavez administration.


A joke yes?

[smilie=qright2.gif]


Yeah, ok...you got me there....I was kind of at a loss for a better word. The whole thing going on down there is outside the box.

Monte
Sedona
 

Postby backstop » Mon 06 Sep 2004, 22:21:23

Dear Soft landing,

again your analysis of US strategy fits like a glove over a goal of destabilizing the middle east in order to advance Peak Oil.

Am I right in thinking that Simmons works for Bush, or has worked for Bush ?

If so, just what filters should I bear in mind for the information he releases ?

Dear Sidona,

about '93 I learned that roughly half of developing counties' total foreign currency earning went to pay for fossil fuel imports. I wonder if you can tell me what the present percentage is ?

My interest is in trying to size up the impact on the dollar of nations shifting to sustainable energies which will greatly increase energy-self-reliance.

regards to you both,

Backstop
backstop
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1463
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Varies

Postby Sedona » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 02:57:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('backstop', '
')
Dear Sidona,

about '93 I learned that roughly half of developing counties' total foreign currency earning went to pay for fossil fuel imports. I wonder if you can tell me what the present percentage is ?

My interest is in trying to size up the impact on the dollar of nations shifting to sustainable energies which will greatly increase energy-self-reliance.


Sorry, I don't know that figure. But I do know that many of these countries are looking for their first car and refrigerator. China is building 2 coal fired plants a week! And the coal has lots of arsenic in it which is leaving many with lesions. China is having a 80% increase in cars per year. Beijing used to be bicycles...no more. I'll see if I can find you a figure. I'll bet it is a lot more now.
Sedona
 
Top

Iraq and the Middle East: Descent into chaos?

Postby Leanan » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 11:49:12

Unnoticed because it came out the same week as the Republican convention, the tragedy in Russia, and Hurricane Frances:

The Royal Institute of International Affairs, a British think tank, predicts that if things keep going the way they are going in Iraq, the most likely result is a civil war that could destabilize the entire Middle East, including Saudi Arabia:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtm ... ID=6145759

Imagine what that would do to the price of oil.

Reading between the lines, I think things are worse in Iraq than we're being told. Now the U.S. military is saying that some parts of Iraq won't be allowed to vote in the elections because of the unrest. What kind of democracy is that? It will not only throw the legitimacy of whoever is elected into doubt, it will really tick off those who are excluded. This smells like a desperation move.
User avatar
Leanan
News Editor
News Editor
 
Posts: 4582
Joined: Thu 20 May 2004, 03:00:00

Postby Yavicleus » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 12:04:51

From a PO point of view, chaos in Iraq & Saudi Arabia is great news.

Chaos will artificially drive up the cost of oil, forcing the "markets" to respond with innovation far before they would have in the event of an actual supply peak.

It's sad, but I'm actually hoping for all out civil war in Iraq & Saudi Arabia because of that.
User avatar
Yavicleus
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 330
Joined: Fri 16 Jul 2004, 03:00:00

Postby stepka » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 22:56:24

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')haos will artificially drive up the cost of oil, forcing the "markets" to respond with innovation far before they would have in the event of an actual supply peak.

It's sad, but I'm actually hoping for all out civil war in Iraq & Saudi Arabia because of that.


I suppose it's too much to hope for, but I sure wish we could get smart without all the chaos. Our soldiers and the Iraqi people have surely had enough. And how does it feel to be part of the problem that destabized the Middle East to that point? I just can't hope for that. If we can't get smart on our own, then we don't deserve to have what we have, that's all.
User avatar
stepka
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: missouri
Top

Postby gg3 » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 23:14:08

I second Stepka here.

And tonight, the USA war-dead total hit 1,000. And God knows how many civilians caught in the crossfire by now.

No civil war, no more entropy, no, no, a thousand times, no.

A close friend of mine is over there. And probably most of us know someone who's over there.

We need someone competent in charge, this has gone so far out of control it's sickening.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Postby MonteQuest » Tue 07 Sep 2004, 23:27:34

When asked recently if he believes his administration is responsible for fueling the recruitment of al Qaeda through some of its policies, particularly the invasion of Iraq, Bush responded, “It is a ridiculous notion to assert because the more the United States is on the offense more people want to hurt us.”

This statement alone underscores Bush’s ignorance of the depth of Arab nationalism and the subtle zephyrs that blow through the region. In the words of one Iraqi exile, “Getting rid of Saddam Hussein is one thing…but you won’t find any self-respecting Iraqi prepared to cooperate with an American puppet regime.” When we were attacked on 9/11, we had the world’s support against a common enemy. We have now turned sympathy into suspicion, and we are quickly losing friends who fear our new aggressiveness. And when your friends fear you, you are in deep, deep trouble.


A Western journalist, Thomas Freidman, had some perceptive thoughts on postwar occupation of Iraq a few days before the start of the war on March 19, 2003: ”Then we will know if the hawkish dreamers of the project [Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wofowitz, Richard Perle] have indeed taken over U.S. foreign policy. How they remake free Iraq will tell us whether they plan to remake the world. It’s after victory that the most enduring impact will be felt, whether it be a hated U.S.-led occupation, sparking a fresh round of global terrorism, or the sudden release of Iraq’s lethal, internal tensions which Saddam has kept pent-up for 35 years. Kurds could fight Turks for their own state in the north; Shias might team up with Iran for control of the south; everyone may turn on the hated Saddamite Ba’athists in a frenzy of revenge. Iraq will not be like 1940s Japan and Germany, the occupations fondly remembered by the U.S. commentariat. Those were coherent nations; Iraq is an artificial fusion of antagonistic tribes. Victory may be rapid and easy - but that’s when the real troubles could start.”

“Although peaceful political change by elections rather than coups, and peaceful merger of adjoining countries by plebiscite rather than invasion might be a nice way to go, it's not the way things have been done in this part of the world—ever. A country that has suffered the Mongols is not afraid of Americans; George Bush is no Tamerlane. We suffered under Saddam and we hate him, but we would put him in our hearts ahead of a Christian or a Jew - because he is a Muslim. We are a warrior people, and you forget that only at your peril. We have the stomach for mass violence. Do you?” —Ahmed, an Iraqi insurgency leader on the prospect of democracy.
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Postby stepka » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 12:31:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e are a warrior people, and you forget that only at your peril. We have the stomach for mass violence. Do you?


No Monte, as a nation we don't. We can't even fathom the way these people think. We're stupid if we think we can press democracy on them, but I don't think the warhawks are trying to press democracy, as they say. The truth is much more cynical than that.

BTW, Monte, you are a real asset to this forum. I hope you keep posting. And Leanan, I love to read the articles you dig up.
User avatar
stepka
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: missouri
Top

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 13:15:05

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stepka', ' ')
No Monte, as a nation we don't. We can't even fathom the way these people think. We're stupid if we think we can press democracy on them, but I don't think the warhawks are trying to press democracy, as they say. The truth is much more cynical than that.

BTW, Monte, you are a real asset to this forum. I hope you keep posting. And Leanan, I love to read the articles you dig up.


Thanks for the compliment, Stepka. I see you hail from Missouri? I have 212 acres in NW MO.

Yes, I, too, was surprised at the notion of democracy in Iraq. The qualities that make American life desirable evolved from our civil society, created by millions of men and women using the freedom created under limited constitutional government. Only a fool would believe they could be spread overnight with bombs and bucks, and only a fool would insist that the values defined by George W. Bush as American are necessarily those for which we should fight any war at all. Bush misled the American people and the Congress, peddled falsehoods to the UN, and most definitely miscalculated the ease of making democracy flourish in a country endemic with religious and tribal hatreds—and abysmally empty of any experience with such concepts as individual rights, equality, and the freedom of religion—for centuries!
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Postby stepka » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 15:36:34

Absolutely. Not even a 10 foot snowstorm will keep me from voting this time around. My new motto is: "Kerry is a douchebag, but I'm voting for him anyway!" (I ripped that off some website--sorry whoever you are)
User avatar
stepka
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: missouri

Kerry protects the environment

Postby pofan » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 15:47:27

At least Kerry has a 96% lifetime LCV record of protecting the environment. We will need someone who considers the environment as part of the picture when TSHTF. It would be so easy to pollute the water, air, etc. and make everything that much worse when oil gets scarce. Can you picture Mexico City style haze covering our whole country?
pofan
 

Postby stepka » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 20:49:46

Pofan, the great thing about PO is that we will no longer be able to pollute as effectively as we have done. The downside is that it will be much harder and more expensive to clean up after ourselves--the mess we have made already. All these pro nuclear folks have yet to convince me that it's a good idea, because we still don't know where we're going to put the waste, long term. You don't hear much about that these days do you? And now our window of opportunity is closing. So I guess it will just sit there in pools for the next how many thousand years. I sure hope the owners of these things will create some kind of "Priesthood" to tend these pools, because they have a responsibility to ALL future generations.

Monte, I don't really consider Kerry to be a d-bag, but when I saw that slogan, it tickled my funny bone. I just hope he has some sane plans for Iraq. I think if he sent Mickey Mouse over there, it would make more sense than what is going on now.

Also, I am in the SE of MO. The whole other corner.
User avatar
stepka
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 151
Joined: Fri 27 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: missouri

Postby MonteQuest » Wed 08 Sep 2004, 21:14:55

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('stepka', 'A')lso, I am in the SE of MO. The whole other corner.


Ah, Popular Bluff area? I was a NPS Ranger at the Arch in St. Louis for a while and know the area well.

Kerry sounds like he plans to increase the troop strength there by 40,000. He also promises to try to work with our "alienated" allies to have a more unilateral approach to the occupation, but I wonder if that is now possible. One would have thought that it was a obvious high priority to improve U.S. relations with the Islamic world, in order to dry up support for the deviant variant of Islam that is al Qaeda. After all, al Qaeda had their own sophisticated propaganda machine trying to influence millions of Muslims to act against America. To defeat the enemy and prevent it from achieving its objectives, we needed to do more than just arrest and kill people.

As the Red Cross and the United Nations prepared to scale back in Iraq because of shocking attacks by Saddam Hussein loyalists, and as the death toll of Americans and Iraqis climbed ever higher, day by painful day, Bush's remarkable assurance that great progress is being made in Baghdad has made even Republicans nervous. Highway 8 leading to Najaf is one of the worst in Iraq. Westerners are murdered there. It is littered with burnt-out police vehicles and American trucks, and reminds you of the road leading out of Kuwait city during the Gulf War. When suicide bombers ram their cars into hundreds of recruits outside police stations, how on earth can anyone hold an election next January?
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Heroic Iraqi freedom fighters are beating the Americans

Postby cador » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 03:26:48

http://outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20041220&fname=fallujah&sid=1

"The enemy is on the run.They are in fear of a resistance movement they can not see nor predict.We, now choose when, where, and how to strike. And as our ancestors drew the first sparks of civilization, we will redefine the word 'conquest'. Today we write a new chapter in the arts of urban warfare"

50,000 American soldiers have been "medically evacuated" out of Iraq since March 2003. From a purely military strategic point of view, a wounded soldier is just as good as a dead soldier.

I remember watching the movie _Red Dawn_ (starring Patrick Swayze) on TV a few months ago. In this movie, young American teenagers use guerilla tactics to fight against Soviet/Cuban forces who have occupied Southwestern US. I see many similarities between the fictitious American "freedom fighters/terrorists" and the current Iraqi "terrorists/freedom fighters".
cador
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu 04 Nov 2004, 04:00:00

Postby Anti » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 03:34:25

I feel so badly for these guys sent by King George to conquer that land.

Of course, I can't imagine the pussies in this country fighting such an invasion with such ferosity, were some foreigners to invade here. I am sure at least 1/3 of you would be sucking Sadams dick were the tables reversed and Iraq invaded the USA, just like you are sucking Georges dick now. Of course another 1/3 of you wanted to suck Kerry's dick, so I guess that tells a lot about the good old USA.
Anti
 

Postby Taskforce_Unity » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 04:32:10

I wouldn't take that news item too literally. I read it too and it has some major errors on the weapons presiding in iraq. Ofcourse there is a core of truth in it. They can't keep the road to baghdad safe, they can't secure the area etc.

I don't feel sorry for the soldiers. They are soldiers, they chose to go to war, there is a risk of dieing in vain. Since war always is a stupid cause in my opinion this makes it no different of a "justified" war. War is never justified
User avatar
Taskforce_Unity
Coal
Coal
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Mon 22 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Holland

Postby Specop_007 » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 08:46:34

"Heroic Iraqi freedom fighters"

:lol:

"Despicable cowardly terrorists"

Fixed that for you. :)
"Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the
Abyss, the Abyss gazes also into you."

Ammo at a gunfight is like bubblegum in grade school: If you havent brought enough for everyone, you're in trouble
User avatar
Specop_007
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5586
Joined: Thu 12 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Postby 0mar » Thu 23 Dec 2004, 11:00:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Specop_007', '"')Heroic Iraqi freedom fighters"

:lol:

"Despicable cowardly terrorists"

Fixed that for you. :)


yea its not like killing yourself for a cause that you believe takes any balls. of course not, it only takes cowardice to do so. how could i have been so blind!!
Joseph Stalin
"It is enough that the people know there was an election. The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. "
User avatar
0mar
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue 12 Oct 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Davis, California
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests