Good post Rockdoc. What I'm concerned about is the way people view this. There seems to be absolutely middle ground in this debate.
On the one hand you have the Montequests (no offence) who think that the great apocalypse is upon us. That peakoil, global warming, breast cancer, super flu, and every imaginable threat to humankind will unite and wipe a large portion of our species of our planet.
On the other side you have the Oilwatches, Morrisons and Hydro's, who think that at the moment PO strikes we will pull some kind of cold nuclear fusion out of our arse and everything will be just fine.
Then you have the occasional loony like Specop (again, no offence) who thinks that every problem should be shot. But he really is in a category of his own.
As I look at the public debate over oil heating up, in the public media, in our canteen, in our family, I see the same polarisation. So I imagine that when it is finally confirmed we will have three kind of people.
- Those who head for the hills because they think the problem is unsolvable
- Those who think that the best way to solve the problem is to do nothing.
- Those who don't give a f*ck because they are mentally incapable of having an opinion.
When one part of the country is sitting in their barbed-wire bunker guarding their sweet potatoes, one part driving their bulletproof Beemer from one corporate orgy to another and another part sitting where they have always been (on their couch watching Oprah), who will watch the shop? Who will have the vision and the guts to address the problems which lie in front of us before they grow to unfixable proportions?
PO is as you said a very slow event we won't suddenly run out of fertiliser. However the future is not shaped by geophysics, but by the reaction (or absence of reaction) of the people to it. I do believe that most of the problems are fixable, but I also believe that those problems could have pretty nasty effects, sooner than we think, if we don't act.