Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

In praise of die-offs

What's on your mind?
General interest discussions, not necessarily related to depletion.

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Heineken » Sat 13 Aug 2005, 23:38:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bart', 'S')orry guys, I think doomerism is doomed.

1. If the Peak Oil don't get you, then Global Warming will.

2. Even with the die-off scenario, there will be wars, depressions, diseases... no one will be immune, no one can hide.

3. Politically, doomerism is insane. For quite a while, central governments will have access to fossil fuels and power, with the potential for good or evil.

4. Morally, doomerism is the pits. So, you will stand by and let hundreds of millions die, without lifting a finger? How will you be judged by history?

5. The complete lack of historical consciousness is amazing. In previous eras, nations were quite able to deal with severe cutbacks in resources. In our own era, Cuba is an outstanding example -- whether you agree with its politics or not. Many nations in WW2 endured severe cutbacks. The key is whether a society can muster the co-operative spirit to deal with challenges. Physical resources are secondary.

I guess this is where I part company with the peakoil.com folks. I'm sorry to see most of you go down this path, but good luck anyway.

My best,
Bart


I have read your post several times, but I cannot figure out what your point is. Maybe I need to go back to school.

Yes, Cuba is dealing, but it is a totally different place than it was 15 years ago. One could say that the Cuban civilization that existed then has died off (although its people did not, I'll grant you). But Cuba is a very poor laboratory for the rest of the world, esp. the U.S. You're not going to see the Cuban example here. You're going to see revolution here---rioting, savagery, social breakdown, many deaths, economic depression---long before you're going to see a Cuba-type adaptation. Americans, fat and soft and oil-addicted, are totally unprepared for what's coming. The Cubans were already used to deprivation when Russia cut off its oil teat.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Dukat_Reloaded » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 01:33:43

1. If the Peak Oil don't get you, then Global Warming will.

It may get you (unprepared), it won't get me.(prepared) Add ignorant in too.

2. Even with the die-off scenario, there will be wars, depressions, diseases... no one will be immune, no one can hide.

If your strong, you have a better chance to surive, if your weak you'll perish. Add ignorant in too.

3. Politically, doomerism is insane. For quite a while, central governments will have access to fossil fuels and power, with the potential for good or evil.

If there is a government. I tell you, I won't be part of the army or police force if the money I'm paid is worthless and I can't buy nothing with it.

4. Morally, doomerism is the pits. So, you will stand by and let hundreds of millions die, without lifting a finger? How will you be judged by history?

Did Jesus care what history thought of him?

I would only lift my middle finger at them. They had the chance to listen and they said nay, everything is fine and continued on causing the problem making it worse. It's like you go on a walk with 10 people into the desert, you fill up your water bottle and you recommend that they do to, they say nay, we won't need it, you insist that they do but they don't listen. Afew hours later they want a drink of your water but you have to refuse because you only have enough for yourself and you point out to them that they had a chance to fill up to. You can not help people like this and if I could I would not want to.

5. The complete lack of historical consciousness is amazing. In previous eras, nations were quite able to deal with severe cutbacks in resources. In our own era, Cuba is an outstanding example -- whether you agree with its politics or not. Many nations in WW2 endured severe cutbacks. The key is whether a society can muster the co-operative spirit to deal with challenges. Physical resources are secondary.

As you have heard from the optimists here, they would rather die than give up their luxuries and status quo produced from oil. I think you would rather die too bart, you have disconnected yourself from reality and entered fantasy.


I guess this is where I part company with the peakoil.com folks. I'm sorry to see most of you go down this path, but good luck anyway.

See you at dieoff day Bart. (He sounds like he's off to buy a SUV) hahaha

Far out Bart, you sound as if you were walking through the dead of night in the woods and now you've found the light that has saved you and brought salvation. This coal into oil rubbish is gaining too much montentum, it is really deluding these optimists.

My best,
Bart 8) :P

Your best?.......or your dumbest?
User avatar
Dukat_Reloaded
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 953
Joined: Sun 31 Jul 2005, 03:00:00

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 01:41:14

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Aaron', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('dukat', 'G')reat post


What he said...


Yep
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby gg3 » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 01:58:59

Interestingly, we have Bart and folks of similar orientation making reasoned arguements, and then we have others attacking him with ad-hominems and put-downs. This says something about the validity of the various positions represented.

I'm no fan of state socialism, but empirically the fact remains that Cuba made it without a die-off. One empirical example is worth a heck of a lot more than a bunch of bluster. Whether we learn from the example remains to be seen.

As for water bottles in the desert, the third option is to fill up a ten-gallon tank and then when the other nine people start whining about lack of water, tell them, "OK, you'll have water. But first you have to concede that your lack of preparation would have killed you, and you have to start thinking for yourself in the future."

The petty-minded person with the tank would demand the unprepared others turn themselves into slaves or otherwise pay dearly, and thereby gain the instability of the other nine's resentments. The truly intelligent person with the tank will instead turn it into a learning experience aimed toward bettering the others, and thereby gain allies.
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 02:06:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', '
')I'm no fan of state socialism, but empirically the fact remains that Cuba made it without a die-off.


Can you make the case that Cuba had absolutely no access to fossil fuel made materials or technology from outside it's country? I think not.

Cuba is a very good example of dealing with an embargo, but not peak oil.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby jato » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 02:43:52

Using the CIA factbook I calculated the following:

Cuba 11.3 million people using 163k barrels of oil per day. 69 people per barrel. Which is better than the world average per capita (global per capita @84 mbd it is 76.7 people per barrel)

USA 300 million people using 20m barrels per day. 15 people per barrel


To be equivilant to CUBA's per capita oil use, the USA would use 4.32 million barrels of oil per day.



What is the USA's current domestic production of oil?
jato
 

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby seldom_seen » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 02:50:22

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MonteQuest', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('gg3', '
')I'm no fan of state socialism, but empirically the fact remains that Cuba made it without a die-off.


Can you make the case that Cuba had absolutely no access to fossil fuel made materials or technology from outside it's country? I think not.

Cuba is a very good example of dealing with an embargo, but not peak oil.

They've also done an excellent job of transplanting their surplus population to Florida. Another non-option in a peak oil world.
seldom_seen
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2229
Joined: Tue 12 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 02:50:51

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('jato', 'W')hat is the USA's current domestic production of oil?


A little over 5 million barrels.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Raxozanne » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 02:59:18

Cuba only made it through because they powerdowned and relocalised agriculture. I don't see the UK government going, 'right everyone out to the fields, now lets breed some oxen for ya'. Somehow I think the capitilist pigs will force the government to keep the dying system stumbling along until it falls over completely.
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 05:25:17

There are 6.7 billion people in the world. The population increases by 90 million people a year, equivalent to another Mexico each year. China alone is adding 10,000 new cars a day. India is right behind them. Matthew Simmons says oil could easily reach $300 a barrel this winter if production can't meet demand.

Bart will have no chance to build sustainable communities for the 21st century unless something is done about this huge population overreach. It's not a question of ethics, conservation or community. Those were questions that needed to be addressed 30 years ago.

What will the U.S. government do? What it's been doing for the past four years. Loot everything that's not nailed down.
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby bart » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 06:01:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MQ', 'C')an you make the case that Cuba had absolutely no access to fossil fuel made materials or technology from outside it's country? I think not.

Cuba is a very good example of dealing with an embargo, but not peak oil.

As we know, oil won't vanish with Peak Oil; it will just become more and more expensive (if it can be bought at all). Energy from other sources will be available, such as nuclear and coal, though they have their own problems and are awkward substitutes for oil. So I do believe that the Cuba is an appropriate model.

It's not that Cuba is a utopia by any means, but it was able to make the transition to a low-energy society without a die-off, civil war or social breakdown.

I'm in correspondence now with a woman who grew up in Sweden during World War II when very little oil was available. Even though life was Spartan by contemporary US standards, she looks back on it as a happy time. There were no private autos, and: $this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'O')uthouses were still very common, but not in our house. The winters were the coldest in recent history and all sorts of stuff was burnt which caused enormous pollution. No hot water for apartment buildings where most people lived. We had our own big house and therefore could have a bath on Fridays, but my poor teenage brother had to saw a lot of wood for it by hand

Life in a low energy society will not be a Club Med cruise, but it is endurable.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby gg3 » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 06:27:20

Okay, Monte et. al., we're doomed at the macro scale, and no turning back.

In that case our efforts should be directed toward a) the usual grassroots civic action including broadcast propaganda, oriented toward encouraging whatever policies (including birth control etc.) could potentially reduce the intensity of the crash, and b) building sustainable community infrastructure and social structures on the local scale wherever we happen to live, and c) for those of us who live in truly untenable locations such as the Arizona desert, Nevada, and so on, moving to more viable regions immediately.

Oh, and for some people, becoming MZBs so they can rape & pillage & loot, and get arrested or shot by those of us who are settled & sustainable.

Who's in...?
User avatar
gg3
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 3271
Joined: Mon 24 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: California, USA

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby MonteQuest » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 14:33:27

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bart', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MQ', 'C')an you make the case that Cuba had absolutely no access to fossil fuel made materials or technology from outside it's country? I think not.

Cuba is a very good example of dealing with an embargo, but not peak oil.


As we know, oil won't vanish with Peak Oil; it will just become more and more expensive (if it can be bought at all). Energy from other sources will be available, such as nuclear and coal, though they have their own problems and are awkward substitutes for oil. So I do believe that the Cuba is an appropriate model.


It's close to a model, but since the price of fossil fuel related imported items did not go up in price, then they only had to deal an oil embrago that made their society low-energy.

For example, they constantly tell us we are less dependent upon fossil fuels per capitia here in the US. But people fail to realize that most of our consumer goods are made overseas where the energy use tally is added to their column, not ours.

I don't mean to nit-pick, but I think this can make a big difference in how we evaluate the success of Cuba.

And if someone has read my die-off scenario, you will see that I believe a decline in the standard of living is going to be the "material die-off" of the more developed nations, not a physical die-off, per se.

So, in that sense, they have not avoided a die-off.

Cuba is ahead of the US in infant mortality as they do have a far better health care system than we do, at least it reaches more people. This is also a key factor in their success.
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel."
User avatar
MonteQuest
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 16593
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Westboro, MO
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Heineken » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 14:56:03

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('bart', '
')It's not that Cuba is a utopia by any means, but it was able to make the transition to a low-energy society without a die-off, civil war or social breakdown.

Cuba was able to do so because it was already using far less energy per capita than is the case in the United States. And Cuba was in general already a pretty agrarian society. So the transition you refer to was far less of a transition than would be the case in the U.S. Also, in Cuba a centralized government was already in place that made it far easier to "dictate" new programs to the Cuban people. Try that in the U.S.---I think the fat asses here would prefer to die sealed inside their Cadillacs than wade out into the farm fields and pick up a hoe. I don't think the U.S. can get to where Cuba is now without a Cuban-type revolution and a substantial die-off.
"Actually, humans died out long ago."
---Abused, abandoned hunting dog

"Things have entered a stage where the only change that is possible is for things to get worse."
---I & my bro.
User avatar
Heineken
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7051
Joined: Tue 14 Sep 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Rural Virginia
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby bart » Sun 14 Aug 2005, 16:57:12

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MQ', '.')..I believe a decline in the standard of living is going to be the "material die-off" of the more developed nations, not a physical die-off, per se.
There's something suspicious here, Monte. As soon as I understand how you are using your terms, I end up agreeing with you 90%!

"Transition to a low-energy society," "powerdown" (Heinberg), "material die-off" (MQ), "the prosperous way down" (H.T. Odum), "energy descent" (David Holmgren) -- these all describe the coming reality as I see it.

Last week I attended some talks given by David Holmgren (co-originator of permaculture and one of the best thinkers about a low-energy future, see http://energybulletin.net/524.html .)

He echoed the two strategies advocated by Richard Heinberg: Powerdown (political co-operation on a large scale) and Lifeboats (self-sufficient communities). But, he said, he saw no contradiction between them.

It's critical to have working models of low-energy communities, he maintains, so that as conditions become stressful, the general public has patterns that are ready to be adopted.

He stressed the importance of not being isolated from the surrounding community. Reach out to people and groups, even those with whom you might not agree. You want to be known as the people with the neat low-tech technology, who can grow things, who are willing to share. [The Shakers and the Amish had a similar benign relationship with the surrounding society.] You don't want to be known as suspicious weirdos as times get bad and people are looking for scapegoats.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 02:20:13

Bart,

One thing I've done here in the valley for the last 10 years is to drink coffee with the good ol' boys down at the cafe every morning. We have bonded in a pretty good way, even though I'm still basically a Boulder granola guy.

However, the community of permaculture, organic environmentalist New Agers who live here have avoided these people like the plague, and have really, really irritated them by moving in and immediately demanding the ranchers remove their cows from the mountain pastures, stop spraying mosquitos, start doing land-use planning, etc., etc. in a very confrontive way. They are completely despised because of this.

On the other hand, I'm part of the community now even though my views about things are almost diametrically opposed to the good ol' boys. But I can harass them about their redneck ways and attitudes because we're all friends now, and we help each other out. And as an added benefit, many of these guys still remember how to use draft horses and live very conservatively off the land, since that's how they grew up.

My feeling is that when things start to get difficult around here, I'd rather be part of the community than be one of the arrogant city newcomers telling everybody else what to do.
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby oowolf » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 18:34:12

Remenber the Rapanui, after trashing their environment, began-and expedited -THEIR dieoff with warfare.
User avatar
oowolf
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 1337
Joined: Tue 09 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Big Rock Candy Mountain

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby bart » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 19:19:21

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Colorado Valley', ' ')I'm part of the community now even though my views about things are almost diametrically opposed to the good ol' boys. But I can harass them about their redneck ways and attitudes because we're all friends now, and we help each other out

Sounds like you're well placed to be a communicator between the two groups, C-V. I look forward to the day when there's better communication.

Some other people who can communicate with both sides:
Allan Savory and Holistic Range Management

Joel Salatin, a farmer and writer from Virginia.$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'W')e can talk all day about the environment and clean food, but if our farms are not fun, not profitable, or too much work - our children won't want them and we're spitting in the wind.

I admire farmers, ranchers, etc. for many things, but wow do they let themselves be manipulated. All the way to the bankruptcy court and the cancer ward (pesticides). It didn't used to be that way. The grange and farmers groups were in the front of the progressive movement. Farmers themselves, when they're not playing the role of redneck, will often tell you that they are their own worst enemies.

The idea that there's a conflict of interest between the farmers and the urban greens is a counter-productive illusion.

The greens have been realizing how important the local farmers are, and have been establishing farmers market and promoting the idea of buying locally. (See Why We Pay Too Little for Well Travelled Food in the Tyee.)

Mr. Farmer and Mr. Ranger: Do you want a high-paying market for your produce -- one that won't be undercut by China or Mexico? Get in touch with the hippie restauranteers and food stores.
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif
Top

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby Colorado-Valley » Mon 15 Aug 2005, 23:43:32

Yeah, Bart, I'm well acquainted with both those guys, and I've written for High Country News, which attempts to find a common ground between ranchers and newcomers.

On our little ranch, we employ as much of this philosophy as we can.

Today the good ol' boys were getting reallly angry about the gas prices, and apparently Rush had been blaming the environmentalists on the radio, because they were on a rampage.

"There's lots of oil in this country, if the environmentalists would just let 'em drill for it."

I feel a bit sorry for these guys. They all have big diesel pick-ups and tractors, and they've bought into a lifestyle where they have to have those things.

Now their world's beginning to crumble.
User avatar
Colorado-Valley
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon 16 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: In praise of die-offs

Unread postby bart » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 17:40:26

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('Colorado Valley', 'T')hey all have big diesel pick-ups and tractors, and they've bought into a lifestyle where they have to have those things.

Now their world's beginning to crumble.

Yep. To me THIS is the real problem for the industrialized countries. It's not primarily the biological and physical challenges (though those are real enough).

It's the fact that our worldviews are crumbling and we haven't found anything to replace them with.

People need a worldview that explains why the world is the way it is, and provides them with a meaningful way of life. The problem is that the prevailing philosophies and religions developed into their present forms during the fossil fuel era. In a world of declining energy, they are useless as they presently stand.

The challenge is to re-discover the ideas and attitudes that can help us in the future. And to do that, you've got to look outside the current consumer culture -- to the past, to other less matererialistic cultures. There are even many solutions close at hand, in movements and innovations that are under the contemporary radar: permaculture, simple living, non-materialistic themes in many religions...

The problem with doomsterism/survivalism is that it inherits the brashness, impatience and superficiality of the fossil fuel cultures. It can't see any immediate answers and declares a die-off inevitable (present company excepted, of course!)
User avatar
bart
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 659
Joined: Wed 18 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: SF Bay Area, Calif
Top

PreviousNext

Return to Open Topic Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron