Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

'Experts'

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

'Experts'

Postby Markos101 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 07:03:39

It's quotes like these from the BBC News Online report:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '
')But perhaps what is most interesting about this Economics, Industry & Finance Ministry report, is that it actually mentions a possible production plateau at all.

Even one year ago it was unheard of to find the subject mentioned amongst government ministries or financial institutions.

Now banks such as Goldman Sachs, Caisse D'Epargne/Ixis, Simmons International and the Bank of Montreal have all broached the subject.

"They are being forced to by circumstances," says Professor Richard Heinberg, author of 'peak oil' books Power Down and The Party's Over.

"They have relied on optimistic data and rosy outlooks that are being proven to be incorrect."

Nevertheless, some analysts disagree with the notion of any peak in oil production, also known as 'Hubberts curve', after the geologist M King Hubbert who first argued the case.

Deborah White, senior energy analyst at Societe Generale in Paris, says that "we have heard these arguments about 'peak oil' since the idea of Hubert's curve came into being.

"We don't endorse the idea at all."


That make you question whether energy 'experts' deserve a single penny for their efforts. Deborah White here has, catagorically, stated that she doesn't think production will peak.

So we ask then - what does she think oil production will do? Go on forever on a finite planet? Or alternatively, will it reach a maximum and then instantaneously drop off?

Tell me, what the hell are 'experts' like these doing making public statements that feed the revolving door?

'Experts'???

Mark
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

Re: 'Experts'

Postby shakespear1 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 07:57:27

Many of these guys have never seen an oil field. Never looed at data that is used to evaluate reserves, simulate a field or even analize a wells production potential.

Same guys who think that chickens come from the grocery store freezer. :-D

If they do know that chickens are raised on a farm, then perhaps they are purposely not entertaining the notion of peak oil coming soon. :roll:
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby RonMN » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 08:12:20

Maybe it IS to hit a maximum & then just die right then & there...That is what will happen to all the wells that are using water or C02 injection (like gawhar)...once they hit a point where there is so much water cut, the field is dead...there is no downslope.

:cry:
User avatar
RonMN
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri 18 Mar 2005, 04:00:00
Location: Minnesota

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Raxozanne » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 08:14:04

I remember reading that very article last month and asking myself that same question about that woman.
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Raxozanne » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 08:21:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('RonMN', 'M')aybe it IS to hit a maximum & then just die right then & there...That is what will happen to all the wells that are using water or C02 injection (like gawhar)...once they hit a point where there is so much water cut, the field is dead...there is no downslope.

:cry:


LOL like a 50% + depletion rate
Hello, my name is Rax. I live in the Amazon jungle with a bunch of women. We are super eco feminists and our favourite passtimes are dangling men by their ankles and discussing peak oil. - apparently
Raxozanne
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 945
Joined: Thu 24 Feb 2005, 04:00:00
Location: UK

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Mower » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 08:49:22

She is eiether a liar or a fool. One or the other.
User avatar
Mower
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Sun 18 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Canada

Re: 'Experts'

Postby americandream » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 09:33:36

What annoys me is that these papers never seem to ask the next obvious question...is oil going to be an infinite resource then if peaking is not an issue or does she endorse a later peaking date etc, etc, etc. This is dreadful reporting...to be blunt, misleading.
americandream
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 8650
Joined: Mon 18 Oct 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby NEOPO » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 09:34:05

yep

and Ron is an optomist!! heheh :)

I dont even like the word "expert".
I prefer the term "professional" which simply implies a person who is getting paid for doing a job.
It doesnt mean they do it well.
It doesnt mean they wont make common mistakes etc etc.
If I am ever considered an expert in any field please do not tell me it is so as the information will go directly to my brain and seriously effect my "expert" judgement!!!
One day I might even start believing my own bullshit!! 8)

Within a "group/set/click" of people we/they decide who is most knowledgeable on any given subject and we/they title that person "expert".

Can we "add/sticky" this topic onto the current topic concerning Mike Lynch please oh please??? :o
User avatar
NEOPO
Permanently Banned
 
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sun 15 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: THE MATRIX

Re: 'Experts'

Postby rockdoc123 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 11:26:53

Yes it is amazing what constitutes an 'expert". A good friend of my wife's has a PhD in economics and was the chief oil and gas analyst for a company which is very well known for it's predicitions (not going to mention the name in order to protect the guilty...suffice it to say a number of people here have slammed the company on numerous occassions). I had the opportunity to discuss oil price predictions with her on several occassions and she was quoted continually in the press regarding her views as to where oil price was going in say the next 6 months. Interestingly enough she was never right....and I mean never..but she continued to be quoted and treated with deference by the press. Go figure.
Similarily the so-called oil and gas financial experts are another joke. Few of these guys come from technical backgrounds....most from finance backgrounds (I've never yet met someone from the finance end of the companies I've worked for who really appreciates E&P). But they never cease to amaze me how much they claim to know about oil and gas operations of such and such company. Most of these guys wouldn't know a kelly bushing from a baby buggy but they still like to spout off with their predictions and the press laps it up.
Bottom line is if you have a gullible audience you too can be an expert. Care to hear my predictions on the next Rugby world cup.....honestly I'm an expert and you should listen to me. :wink: :wink:
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Markos101 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 12:29:31

That's right, and one of the lessons I've learned over the past couple of years is that the least reliable people to report on anything is journalists. The number of technically competent investigative journalists in the UK is pitifully small, and the media will never divert from the mainstream view. None of them seem to have the slightest of grasps on any subject.

Also, I've learned that some of the worst people to run the country are politicians, who are not 'experts' on anything, and the unfortunate fact of the matter is that they rely on incompetant journalists to tell them what issues matter!...arrggh!

Mark
User avatar
Markos101
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 381
Joined: Tue 24 Aug 2004, 03:00:00
Location: United Kingdom, Various

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Novus » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 13:26:54

When the experts fail to get things right it means standards have decayed in the subject matter. It is a sign that as a society we have started to accept ignorance in place of truth. The last time that happened on a societal scale was during the Dark Ages. - Jane Jacobs Dark Age Ahead
User avatar
Novus
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Tue 21 Jun 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby shakespear1 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 14:04:57

Yes, the word "Expert" is used a lot today in many areas and it just makes you wonder where the person got their experties. :)
Men argue, nature acts !
Voltaire

"...In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation."

Alan Greenspan
shakespear1
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Fri 13 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby lateStarter » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 15:42:17

"We don't endorse the idea at all."

Isn't that like saying: 'we don't like the concept of PO... We do not want it, therefore it will not happen!'

'Remember, I make a lot more money than you do, so that makes me an expert' (even though I am just a mouth-piece [talking head] for my trainers, I still make a lot of money, so I must be an expert. Plus I have really nice hair). The rest of you are just cattle'.
User avatar
lateStarter
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1058
Joined: Wed 06 Apr 2005, 03:00:00
Location: 38 km west of Warsaw, Poland

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Free » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 15:54:06

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lateStarter', '"')We don't endorse the idea at all."

Isn't that like saying: 'we don't like the concept of PO... We do not want it, therefore it will not happen!'



It's really like a kid who puts his head under a blanket, and because it can't see anything, thinks nobody can see it.

Our whole society went through a process of infantilization, and now we pay the price that even our elite, or especially our elite can't put one and one together.
User avatar
Free
Heavy Crude
Heavy Crude
 
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun 28 Nov 2004, 04:00:00
Location: Europe

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Ardalla » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 16:35:09

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', ' ')"we have heard these arguments about 'peak oil' since the idea of Hubert's curve came into being.


To be as generous as possible, the economist making this statement has PO in quotes. She is not saying oil will never peak, just the early peaking as claimed by adherents of the Hubert Curve theory.

We are not going to get anything else out of economists until a crisis happens that clearly indicates there may indeed be a supply problem. They will continue to use the model that states that the supply of raw materials is limited only by market factors, geopolitical events and technology. To an economist Peak Oil is just cold fusion redux. I've pretty much stopped listening to them.

As a matter of fact, I've pretty much stopped listening to anyone predicting anything. I'm tired of PO becoming a media event. I'm just waiting to see what happens; and it should be within the next few months.
User avatar
Ardalla
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 198
Joined: Sun 23 May 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia

Re: 'Experts'

Postby rockdoc123 » Fri 12 Aug 2005, 16:52:13

To be completely fair I think there are some economists who actually understand the current dynamics....one is Jeff Rubin who is the head economist for CIBC world markets:

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'C')anada, more than most countries, should be able to cope with $100 (U.S.) per barrel oil - a price consumers are likely to see by the end of the decade.

Alberta's massive oil sands promise to make Canada one of the world's largest oil producers, and one which is strategically located next to the huge U.S. energy market. Soaring cross-border energy exports to the United States, and the promise of massive investment in the oil sands, paint a very rosy picture for the country's oil and gas patch in Alberta.

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for the rest of the Canadian economy. ...

Soaring oil prices have the potential to fundamentally reshape the economic landscape of the country. The key question is to what extent market forces will be permitted to act. The last time oil prices were at or above today's level, in real dollars, Ottawa imposed made-in-Canada oil prices under its infamous National Energy Program. If and how it plans to redistribute national wealth this time around remains to be seen.
User avatar
rockdoc123
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 7685
Joined: Mon 16 May 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Re: 'Experts'

Postby Frontierenergy1 » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 14:05:09

Rockdoc:

So you say they don't know the difference between a Kelly Cock and a Cows Cock?

Hee Hee
User avatar
Frontierenergy1
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue 28 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Oil Patch

Re: 'Experts'

Postby jimmydean » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 14:27:31

To me it's fairly obvious that the oil industry, government and the banks do not want the public to be aware of peak oil.

Reasons:
1. Oil Industry
The longer people think that we are seeing an oil price spike rather than a long term trend the more likely they are to continue OR expand their consumption by buying more SUV's, taking long distance vacations ... which puts cash into oil company coffers. The oil industry would be happy to maintain oil at $75 or more if they could to increase profits.

2. Government
Last thing they want is a panic OR to be held accountable for ineffectual legislation on dealing with the problem (aka Highway Bill! LOL). If they acknowledge peak oil people will begin downsizing their lives which will kill the economy aka their revenue stream. Also the average person may even begin to wonder if Iraq was more about oil control or WMD finally.

3. Banks
People will continue to take outlandishly large mortgages, buy more SUV's and spend more money in general if peak oil is simply dismissed as a crazy idea. Financers win on all fronts and if someone can't afford that house any longer they repossess it and still win.

The longer the denial goes on the longer we can live in advanced reality increasing the likelyhood that PO realization will go BOOM instead of giving us all a chance of a softer landing.
User avatar
jimmydean
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 05 May 2005, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby AdzP » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 16:07:11

I wrote the piece in question:

1. I can`t see the word `expert` used in the selected quote, it says analyst.
2. the piece was all about `peak oil` entering the mainstream debate so it was hardly hiding or obfuscating the subject. it certainly isn't `misleading`.
3. in journalism one often uses people who disagree with a certain subject to show there is differing opinion. which there is on peak oil.
4. there is disagreement even between `peak oilers`. as evidenced by PO.com's forums.
5. it wasn't `a paper` it was BBC News Online.
6. many banks are openly talking about `po`, say Don Coxe at BoM...
7. govts are also talking about it (see the piece)

Why not actually read the piece it might help your expert judgments... ;) :)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4077802.stm

best
adam
User avatar
AdzP
Peat
Peat
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Thu 26 Aug 2004, 03:00:00

Re: 'Experts'

Postby smiley » Tue 16 Aug 2005, 18:43:31

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', 'S')he is eiether a liar or a fool. One or the other


Neither, she works for Societe Generale, a retail bank.

She might be a brilliant analyst or expert, however in all probability she is not allowed to express any other opinion than that of their employer.

Banks make a living by knowing things that others don't know. That's why they employ analysts in the first place.

And it is probably the last place to look for an unbiased, honest answer.
User avatar
smiley
Intermediate Crude
Intermediate Crude
 
Posts: 2274
Joined: Fri 16 Apr 2004, 03:00:00
Location: Europe
Top

Next

Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron