Donate Bitcoin

Donate Paypal


PeakOil is You

PeakOil is You

Those Funny FReepers...

General discussions of the systemic, societal and civilisational effects of depletion.

Those Funny FReepers...

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 08 Aug 2005, 13:29:49

Some comments read over at FreeRepublic.com:

"Once there is a market shift towards hybrids, overall fuel consumption will go down, and oil will settle back into the $40/bl range."

"(Alternatives/Tar Sands/ANWR, et. al.) coming online will plunge the price of crude oil back into the $30-40 range"

"Clinton conspired with OPEC to raise prices from $20/bl to $35/bl in order for Russia to pay back more on its debts..."

Does anybody have any brief, succinct replies for this that don't entail mountains of statistics, which often put the public to sleep?
I'm sitting here trying to think of some, but I realize that I will be delving into a haranguing rant without some help.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Unread postby gnm » Mon 08 Aug 2005, 13:38:39

Yes, they obviously haven't done the numbers.. New projects ANWR/Tar sands etc can only soften the decline of conventional, and won't even be able to replace it. That doesn't even take into account the amount that will be need for demand growth so you can say goodbye to growth right now. If thats not painful enough extrapolate current decline rates (and increases in non-conventional) out 10 years... Then it starts to get VERY painful.

8O -G
gnm
 

Re: Those Funny FReepers...

Unread postby lyrl » Mon 08 Aug 2005, 19:35:30

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '"')Once there is a market shift towards hybrids, overall fuel consumption will go down, and oil will settle back into the $40/bl range."


1) Usage studies of hybrids show that owners drive hybrids more than they would a conventional car. They end up using just as much gas. Therefore, a market shift towards hybrids would not lower fuel consumption.

2) Hybrids are a tiny fraction of the new car market. And brand-spanking-new cars are a tiny fraction of the total cars being driven today. It would take over a century for hybrids to infiltrate the market enough to have any noticible impact.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')(Alternatives/Tar Sands/ANWR, et. al.) coming online will plunge the price of crude oil back into the $30-40 range"


Production costs for alternative oil sources are much higher than for traditional oil. Oil companies will only be able to make money off alternative sources if oil costs continue rising.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('', '"')Clinton conspired with OPEC to raise prices from $20/bl to $35/bl in order for Russia to pay back more on its debts..."


Anybody this paranoid is not going to be convinced by logical arguments. Perhaps you could direct them here; being surrounded by fellow paranoids might do something for their worldview. :lol:
User avatar
lyrl
Wood
Wood
 
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Midwest, USA

Re: Those Funny FReepers...

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Mon 08 Aug 2005, 21:31:38

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('lyrl', '
')Anybody this paranoid is not going to be convinced by logical arguments. Perhaps you could direct them here; being surrounded by fellow paranoids might do something for their worldview. :lol:


LMAO!!! :lol:
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Re: Those Funny FReepers...

Unread postby WebHubbleTelescope » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 01:16:28

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')Does anybody have any brief, succinct replies for this that don't entail mountains of statistics, which often put the public to sleep?


Put the freepers to sleepers, I say. They look so tame when they doze off.
User avatar
WebHubbleTelescope
Tar Sands
Tar Sands
 
Posts: 950
Joined: Thu 08 Jul 2004, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby whiteknight » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 16:06:52

What if they are right?

The Law of Supply and Demand is about as constant as the Law of Gravity. Prices go up as demand increases if supply remains constant. If supply goes down and demand continues to rise prices go up more. If supply goes down and demand goes down prices will level off if not drop a bit.

So the question is how will Hybrids affect oil consumption? Will they reduce consumption of oil or will more consumers keep the useage at the same level? As prices go up people tend to conserve and seek alternatives, will hybrids be that alternative and will they decrease useage? Mind you what the Chinese do will play into this as well. They are looking to be a mobile society here soon, if they go Hybrid we could have a better situation than if they decide 1/4 of a billion folks will be driving SUV's...

As for Tar Sands, the production levels now are pretty small and the cost is high. They use petrolium gasses to boil the water so as they increase in price so does the tar sand oil, however at a point it will be cheeper to go to coal as a heat source for the water. If our hunger for oil is great enough then smoke filling the skies will be seen as no big deal. Those who would oppose such methods would be very unpopular with the majority, not a place to be when folks are hungry. So perhaps those sources will be able to come on line and help with the supply side.

As for the accusations against Clinton, well there is a small amount of merit to them. I have heard complaints and praises about this from folks on all sides of the politcal spectrum so it does take on a bit more of a true color than if it were only Freepers who made the claims. The main question is how much of the price hike was due to Saudi Arabia messing with production at the request of an american president and how much is people making hay from a situatuion that developed beyond the control of either the saudis or president. So in this case, how much do you believe the Saudi's control oil prices and how much control do you believe an american president has over the saudis?

Discounting the info simply because you dont like the source is not wise, even a blind squirrel finds a nut now and again. That nut may just have something you need.

Ok, you can start calling me a nutcase, loonie and nazi now. I'm ready.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 16:20:46

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whiteknight', 'T')he Law of Supply and Demand is about as constant as the Law of Gravity.


See 'inelastic demand'. TPTB have not only condoned, but aggressively pursued policies that put everyone in a car to begin with. Pure collusion. In fact, it's not possible to run the US as is without the automobile. The only possible solution would be a rollout of a massive rail program before TSHTF.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whiteknight', 'T')hey are looking to be a mobile society here soon, if they go Hybrid we could have a better situation than if they decide 1/4 of a billion folks will be driving SUV's...


How about the Chinese not adopting our bad habits? How about they implement rail on a nationwide scale and develop around that? Does it make too much sense?
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby whiteknight » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 19:44:32

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')
'inelastic demand'

TPTB

TSHTF


Please define your terms and acronyms or point me to the place where these terms and acronyms are defined. That last paragraph made no more sence to me than a pentagon breifing...

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'H')ow about the Chinese not adopting our bad habits? How about they implement rail on a nationwide scale and develop around that? Does it make too much sense?


Well, that would be nice. However that is not what the noises comeing out of the Peoples Republic sound like. They are showing an intrest in putting one in four chinese in cars. Thats one of the big worries about peak oil. They are looking to back their currency with gold and that will make our funnypaper less interesting to those with lots of oil.

But we digress.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby MD » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 19:50:08

TPTB the powers that be
TSHTF the shit hits the fan

answers.com is a decent reference for all acronyms
Stop filling dumpsters, as much as you possibly can, and everything will get better.

Just think it through.
It's not hard to do.
User avatar
MD
COB
COB
 
Posts: 4953
Joined: Mon 02 May 2005, 03:00:00
Location: On the ball

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Tue 09 Aug 2005, 21:34:11

'inelastic demand' - a term used when the percentage change in quantity demanded is smaller than the percentage change in price.

In other words, when the price of gas goes up, the demand doesn't fall commensurate with the price increase (not even close). In fact, even though gasoline is at record highs right now, there is still insatiable demand at the pump. Why? Simply because we require it to function as a nation, at least in its current configuration.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 01:31:57

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('MD', 'T')PTB the powers that be
TSHTF the shit hits the fan

answers.com is a decent reference for all acronyms


Thank you. The post is making a bit more sense now.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 01:43:18

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ''')inelastic demand' - a term used when the percentage change in quantity demanded is smaller than the percentage change in price.


Thank you, very good explination. However I think that demand will be much more elastic when we see seriously heavy price increases. Keep in mind, as a percentage of family budget gasoline still isnt above food, rent or even entertainment. Mind you as a small businessman with a mobile locksmith company it does exceede our food budget, however we have two service vehicles and my wifes personal vehicle on the budget so we use just a bit more than the average joe/jane.

You have to look at these things in context. Most folks pay more for coffee and donuts than they do for gasoline, even if they have an SUV or two in the family. It just aint sunk in yet. From $1.70 to $2.20 is a 30% jump, but it's still only 50 cents a gallon. For a new Ford Behemoth that's maybe $10 more for a fill up. If they fill up once a week they just stop going to Starbucks for overpriced coffee and that takes care of it. The next 30% jump will mean no more Einsteins bagels. Another 30% and we will be talkin' some serious sacrfices, maybe the Blockbuster card...

Now when oil hits $100 a barrel, then we will see that demand get REAL elastic. Untill then its just a slight change in the budget. Give it time and Americans will get the hint.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 10:46:02

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('whiteknight', '')$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ''')inelastic demand' - a term used when the percentage change in quantity demanded is smaller than the percentage change in price.


Thank you, very good explination. However I think that demand will be much more elastic when we see seriously heavy price increases. Keep in mind, as a percentage of family budget gasoline still isnt above food, rent or even entertainment. Mind you as a small businessman with a mobile locksmith company it does exceede our food budget, however we have two service vehicles and my wifes personal vehicle on the budget so we use just a bit more than the average joe/jane.

You have to look at these things in context. Most folks pay more for coffee and donuts than they do for gasoline, even if they have an SUV or two in the family. It just aint sunk in yet. From $1.70 to $2.20 is a 30% jump, but it's still only 50 cents a gallon. For a new Ford Behemoth that's maybe $10 more for a fill up. If they fill up once a week they just stop going to Starbucks for overpriced coffee and that takes care of it. The next 30% jump will mean no more Einsteins bagels. Another 30% and we will be talkin' some serious sacrfices, maybe the Blockbuster card...

Now when oil hits $100 a barrel, then we will see that demand get REAL elastic. Untill then its just a slight change in the budget. Give it time and Americans will get the hint.


If this was just about the cost of a family's typical driving habits per month, I might agree. However, the cost of oil affects everything you buy, from cars to food to medicine, and, yes, even those wonderful bagels and cups of coffee. And the simple fact is that we're running out of the good stuff, the stuff that doesn't make the refineries go *boom* every couple of days.

I've said this before, and it still resonates with me well: oil is not a piece of the economic pie, but rather the crust that holds the pie together.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 13:29:23

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', '
')If this was just about the cost of a family's typical driving habits per month, I might agree. However, the cost of oil affects everything you buy, from cars to food to medicine, and, yes, even those wonderful bagels and cups of coffee. And the simple fact is that we're running out of the good stuff, the stuff that doesn't make the refineries go *boom* every couple of days.

I've said this before, and it still resonates with me well: oil is not a piece of the economic pie, but rather the crust that holds the pie together.


No disagreements on your data. Perhaps a disagreemnt on your analysis... Oil is vital and it is getting harder to pull it out of the ground. However methinks that it simply hasn't hit home yet. Let it hit $3.50 to $4.00 a gallon and you will see a change in attitudes. As oil hits $75 to $100 a barrel I think we will see plastic recycling become economicly feasable and increaseing our recycleing will help alot with the demand. As it hits $150 to $200 then you can expect some serious belt tightening and a change in how we get things done.

The majority of people live their lives and make their plans in the very short term. They budget for the month and look forward to christmass at best. The figger everythign after that will work out somehow. If they could manage to see far enogh ahead and remember far enough behind they would have strung the politicos up YEARS ago for screwing this all up. But there is hope. Rope is still cheep and maybe, just maybe, we will live to see congress critters hanging from lamp poles where they belong.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top

Unread postby emersonbiggins » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 13:40:49

I don't think the problem will be reducing demand as much as reducing demand and maintaining economic growth, which is requisitely important for our current system. Without growth, our economy is headed for recession, and then depression. If people cut back on consumption of other goods to pay for gas, we're going to sustain heavy losses in all sectors except for the energy sector. That sector's growth will come at the expense of all the other sectors in the economy. The only reason that PO isn't hitting us harder right now is because of all the relentless activity in the real estate market, which may be coming to a standstill and then a freefall. The chickens are certainly coming home to roost.

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('WhiteKnight', 'R')ope is still cheep and maybe, just maybe, we will live to see congress critters hanging from lamp poles where they belong.


Our current situation, the recent Energy bill passage notwithstanding, was determined by a collusion of Big Oil, Big Auto, Big Rubber, Big Highway and Big Real Estate and, of course, Big Gov't over a half-century ago. Those are the people who deserve the blame for our imbalanced approach to transportation and housing in this country. Of course, we are all complicit in it for letting it get to this point.
User avatar
emersonbiggins
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 5150
Joined: Sun 10 Jul 2005, 03:00:00
Location: Dallas
Top

Unread postby whiteknight » Wed 10 Aug 2005, 15:32:13

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', ' ')I don't think the problem will be reducing demand as much as reducing demand and maintaining economic growth, which is requisitely important for our current system. Without growth, our economy is headed for recession, and then depression.


Oh we are going to hit that recession and depression peak oil or not. The game is getting out of hand. I think the govt has run out of rabbits to pull from thier collective hat and we are lookin' at lean times and hyper inflation that makes the 70's look like nuttin. I think the only ones who aregoing to come out for the better from this one will be the Chinese. Me learning mandarin, how bout you?

$this->bbcode_second_pass_quote('emersonbiggins', 'O')ur current situation, the recent Energy bill passage notwithstanding, was determined by a collusion of Big Oil, Big Auto, Big Rubber, Big Highway and Big Real Estate and, of course, Big Gov't over a half-century ago. Those are the people who deserve the blame for our imbalanced approach to transportation and housing in this country. Of course, we are all complicit in it for letting it get to this point.


Sure, but why not string up politicos just for old times sake. A guy can dream. Not to mention many of the fossils sitting in congress have been around about that long.
User avatar
whiteknight
Lignite
Lignite
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Tue 09 Aug 2005, 03:00:00
Top


Return to Peak Oil Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron